Africapage 2

Place · 229 articles
Share

Coverage, page 2

page 2 of 12

UgandaMulti-Sectoral Needs Assessment - Refugee Settlements and Host Communities, April 2026

Country: Uganda Source: Welthungerhilfe Please refer to the attached file. Uganda hosts the largest refugee population in Africa, nearly 2 million as of January 2026. People displaced continue to arrive, predominantly from South Sudan, the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), and Sudan. Alongside this, cuts in humanitarian funding have placed further strain on the limited resources available to support refugees and host communities. This Multi-Sectoral Needs Assessment (MSNA) across key refugee-hosting areas in Uganda, jointly undertaken by Welthungerhilfe (WHH), Ayuda en Acción, and CESVI as part of Alliance2015 network, was designed to provide a comprehensive and evidence-based understanding of multi-sectoral needs and humanitarian conditions people are experiencing. The assessment covered both selected formal refugee settlements and their surrounding host communities. This report presents the collective perspectives of refugee and host community households, community groups and leaders, settlement and district representatives, and technical officers.

ReliefWebReliefWebWelthungerhilfe21 Sept

Banished to alien lands – Trump’s secret deportation deals | First Thing

Thousands of people deported from the US to countries where they have no connections. Plus, European spy chiefs warn of Moscow action against Nato Good morning. After a plane journey in shackles, an Iranian woman found herself in the middle of Africa in a country she did not know existed. She is one of thousands of people deported from the US on the back of shadowy deals made with dozens of countries. At what scale are third-country deportations happening? Since returning to office in 2025, Donald Trump’s administration has deported more than 25,000 people to countries that are not their own. Which countries are people being deported to? The Trump administration has struck 35 deals allowing it to deport migrants and asylum seekers to countries where they often have no connections. Is this legal? A US federal appeals court ruled on Friday that the Trump administration’s third-country removals policy was unlawful. A three-judge panel unanimously agreed that it violated due process. But the government has 90 days to appeal against the court’s decision, and is expected to do so. How imminent is the threat? “Normunds Mežviets, the director general of the VDD, Latvia’s state security service conceded there were signs that Moscow was making preparations for more decisive action in Europe, but said it was not clear whether the plans were simply part of a destabilisation strategy. “It’s still an open question if they have direct and concrete plans or if it’s just within the context of their overall attempts to spread fear and uncertainty in western society,” he said. Continue reading...

The GuardianThe GuardianJem Bartholomew21 Sept
  • critical toward Donald Trump · 99%

Deportation project: 72 journalists investigate US treatment of migrants

Under secretive deals with countries across Africa and Latin America, the Trump administration has deported thousands of migrants to countries they had never previously visited. Of the 25,000 deportations documented by reporters, the vast majority were sent across the border to Mexico. One of the journalists who investigated the story, Sofía Álvarez Jurado, explains how these people are forced across the borders to Mexico and what happens to them once they arrive.

France 24France 24FRANCE2421 Sept

DR Congo: La riposte à Ebola progresse, mais l’épidémie reste une urgence continentale, selon des scientifiques africains – Africa CDC

Countries: Democratic Republic of the Congo, Uganda Source: Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention Please refer to the attached file. Addis-Abeba, Éthiopie, 17 septembre 2026 – Quatre mois après la désignation comme urgence de santé publique de sécurité continentale (USP-SC/PHECS) de l’épidémie d’Ebola causée par le virus Bundibugyo en République démocratique du Congo, le Groupe consultatif d’urgence (Emergency Consultative Group, ECG) d’Africa CDC a achevé son évaluation scientifique indépendante et formulé ses recommandations pour la prochaine phase de la riposte. Après examen des dernières données épidémiologiques, opérationnelles et scientifiques, l’ECG appelle à un optimisme prudent. Les baisses du nombre de cas et de décès dans certains foyers, notamment en Ituri, sont encourageantes, mais la situation reste hétérogène, avec des hausses dans certaines zones de santé, en particulier au Nord-Kivu. Les données disponibles ne permettent pas encore de confirmer que le pic de l’épidémie a été atteint. Le Groupe recommande donc de maintenir le statut USP-SC/PHECS, d’intensifier la riposte, de consolider les acquis, de réduire les décès communautaires persistants et les lacunes dans l’identification des contacts, de renforcer l’appropriation communautaire, et de protéger et rétablir les services de santé essentiels. Transmission : Les baisses observées dans certains foyers, notamment en Ituri, sont encourageantes, mais la transmission active et les hausses enregistrées dans certaines zones de santé, en particulier au Nord-Kivu, ne permettent pas encore de confirmer que le pic de l’épidémie a été atteint ni que la transmission a été durablement interrompue. Niveau de maîtrise : La transmission n’est pas encore maîtrisée de manière constante dans l’ensemble des zones touchées. Les décès communautaires persistants, les lacunes dans l’identification des contacts et la perturbation des services de santé essentiels restent des préoccupations majeures. Surveillance : Une surveillance renforcée doit être maintenue dans les zones de santé touchées, nouvellement touchées et celles où la transmission réapparaît, avec un renforcement rapide des capacités de riposte dès la détection de nouvelles infections. Vaccination : Poursuivre les études observationnelles et autres études vaccinales, renforcer le consentement éclairé sur l’incertitude du niveau de protection contre le virus Bundibugyo, et continuer à produire des données d’efficacité et de sécurité dans le cadre des protocoles approuvés. Statut USP-SC/PHECS : Maintenir la désignation USP-SC/PHECS et la coordination continentale, tout en suivant les progrès selon des critères clairement définis en vue d’une éventuelle désescalade. Priorités immédiates : Intensifier la riposte, en particulier au Nord-Kivu ; réduire d’urgence les décès communautaires ; renforcer l’identification et le suivi des contacts ainsi que la qualité des données ; approfondir l’appropriation communautaire ; et accélérer le rétablissement des services de santé essentiels. Le Groupe a évalué à la fois l’évolution de l’épidémie et la solidité des données étayant chacune de ses conclusions. L’ECG appelle à un optimisme prudent. Les tendances observées dans certaines zones de santé, notamment en Ituri, sont encourageantes, mais elles ne sont pas uniformes et la transmission reste active dans certaines parties des zones touchées. Cette évaluation tient compte de la diminution des cas et des décès dans certains foyers, ainsi que de l’amélioration des capacités de laboratoire, de prise en charge, de surveillance communautaire, de suivi des contacts et d’autres capacités de riposte, tandis que les hausses observées dans certaines zones de santé, en particulier au Nord-Kivu, nécessitent le maintien d’une riposte intensive. Les données disponibles ne permettent pas encore de confirmer que le pic de l’épidémie a été atteint. Le Groupe met en garde contre toute interprétation des baisses à court terme comme une interruption durable de la transmission. De nouvelles infections et la réapparition de cas dans des zones de santé qui avaient montré des signes d’amélioration exigent une vigilance soutenue jusqu’à ce qu’une interruption durable soit démontrée dans l’ensemble des zones touchées. L’ECG conclut que la transmission n’est pas encore maîtrisée de manière constante dans l’ensemble des zones touchées et que les acquis actuels restent fragiles si les interventions sont relâchées trop tôt. Le Groupe relève des progrès dans les capacités de riposte, tout en soulignant plusieurs préoccupations persistantes : les décès communautaires représentent encore environ 60 % des décès signalés, des lacunes subsistent dans l’identification des contacts et l’exhaustivité des listes, et l’épidémie continue de perturber les services de santé essentiels. Il recommande de maintenir et d’intensifier la riposte, de protéger les acquis en matière de capacités de laboratoire et de traitement, de surveillance communautaire et de suivi des contacts, et d’éviter tout relâchement prématuré des interventions tant que la transmission reste hétérogène. L’ECG appelle à renforcer l’identification et le listage des contacts, en soulignant que des pourcentages élevés de contacts suivis peuvent masquer des lacunes dans l’identification initiale et l’exhaustivité des listes de contacts. Le Groupe recommande de donner la priorité à la qualité, à l’exhaustivité et à la rapidité des données, tout en maintenant une surveillance renforcée dans les zones de santé nouvellement touchées et celles où la transmission réapparaît, avec un renforcement rapide de la riposte lors de la détection de nouvelles infections. Après examen des données scientifiques disponibles, l’ECG recommande de poursuivre les études observationnelles et autres études vaccinales, ainsi que la production de données sur l’efficacité et la sécurité des vaccins utilisés ou évalués dans le cadre de la riposte. Le Groupe recommande que le consentement éclairé indique clairement que le niveau de protection contre le virus Bundibugyo reste à l’étude, en particulier pour les vaccins qui ne sont pas spécifiquement homologués contre la maladie à virus Bundibugyo. Des vaccins supplémentaires peuvent être évalués conformément aux protocoles d’étude approuvés. L’ECG recommande qu’Africa CDC, le Gouvernement de la République démocratique du Congo et les partenaires de la riposte accordent la priorité aux actions suivantes : Maintenir le statut USP-SC/PHECS. Maintenir la désignation USP-SC/PHECS ainsi que la riposte et la coordination à l’échelle continentale, tout en suivant les progrès selon des critères clairement définis en vue d’une éventuelle désescalade. Intensifier la riposte et consolider les acquis. Poursuivre les efforts actuels et renforcer l’intensité de la riposte, en particulier au Nord-Kivu ; protéger les capacités de riposte renforcées et éviter tout relâchement prématuré des interventions tant que la transmission reste hétérogène. Réduire d’urgence les décès communautaires. Intensifier l’engagement communautaire, la détection précoce, l’orientation, l’accès rapide au traitement et les mesures de renforcement de la confiance afin de réduire les quelque 60 % de décès signalés qui surviennent dans les communautés. Renforcer l’appropriation communautaire et la redevabilité. Passer des activités de sensibilisation à une participation réelle des communautés dans la définition des priorités et la conception des interventions locales, afin de renforcer la confiance dans la surveillance, le traitement et la vaccination. Renforcer l’identification et le suivi des contacts ainsi que la surveillance. Améliorer l’exhaustivité de l’identification et du listage des contacts, la qualité et la rapidité des données, et maintenir une surveillance renforcée dans les zones de santé touchées et celles où la transmission réapparaît. Protéger et rétablir les services de santé essentiels. Accélérer la mise en œuvre de services de santé essentiels gratuits afin de rétablir la vaccination de routine, la santé maternelle et infantile, les soins prénatals, la nutrition et les autres services de soins de santé primaires perturbés par l’épidémie, et de réduire la morbidité et la mortalité secondaires. Poursuivre la production de données sur les vaccins. Continuer les études observationnelles et autres études, assurer un consentement éclairé clair sur l’incertitude concernant la protection contre le virus Bundibugyo, et produire des données d’efficacité et de sécurité dans le cadre des protocoles approuvés. « Les données nous donnent des raisons d’être prudemment optimistes, mais elles ne montrent pas encore une maîtrise constante dans l’ensemble des zones touchées. La riposte doit rester pleinement mobilisée, avec une attention urgente aux décès communautaires, à l’identification complète des contacts et à une action rapide partout où la transmission réapparaît », a déclaré le Professeur Salim Abdool Karim, Président du Groupe consultatif d’urgence d’Africa CDC. « Une interruption durable de la transmission doit être démontrée avant d’envisager une désescalade. » S.E. le Dr Jean Kaseya, Directeur général d’Africa CDC, a indiqué qu’Africa CDC donnerait suite aux recommandations de l’ECG. « La recommandation est claire : maintenir le statut USP-SC/PHECS, consolider les acquis et combler les lacunes qui continuent de coûter des vies », a déclaré le Dr Kaseya. « Africa CDC travaillera avec le Gouvernement de la République démocratique du Congo, les communautés et les partenaires pour intensifier la riposte, renforcer la surveillance et le suivi des contacts, rétablir les services de santé essentiels et continuer à produire les données nécessaires pour orienter la vaccination. » L’ECG est présidé par le Professeur Salim Abdool Karim et réunit vingt scientifiques et experts africains de haut niveau en santé publique : Membre Membre Prof. Salim Abdool Karim, Président Prof. Helen Rees Dr David Parirenyatwa Prof. Lucille Blumberg Prof. Jean-Jacques Muyembe Prof. Francine Ntoumi Prof. Rose Leke Fonbang Prof. Jean Nachega Dr Amadou Sall Prof. Oyewale Tomori Prof. Samba Sow Prof. Dimie Ogoina Prof. Abderahmane Maroufi Prof. Maha El Rabbat Prof. Samia Menif Marrakchi Prof. Fawzi Derrar Dr Sultani Matendechero Prof. Nelson Sewankambo Prof. Claude Mambo Muvunyi Prof. Agnes Binagwaho Africa CDC poursuit son travail avec le Gouvernement de la République démocratique du Congo, les communautés touchées, l’OMS et les partenaires de la riposte afin de mettre en œuvre les recommandations de l’ECG et d’adapter les opérations à l’évolution de la situation épidémiologique. ### Le Groupe consultatif d’urgence d’Africa CDC est un organe indépendant composé de scientifiques et d’experts africains de haut niveau en santé publique. Il conseille le Directeur général d’Africa CDC lors des urgences majeures de santé publique. Ses avis scientifiques ont éclairé les décisions d’Africa CDC tout au long de la riposte à Ebola. Les Centres africains de contrôle et de prévention des maladies sont l’agence de santé publique de l’Union africaine. En tant qu’institution autonome, Africa CDC soutient les États membres de l’UA dans le renforcement des systèmes de santé, l’amélioration de la surveillance des maladies et le renforcement de la préparation et de la réponse aux urgences sanitaires. Pour plus d’informations, visitez http://www.africacdc.org et suivez Africa CDC sur LinkedIn , X , Facebook , et YouTube . Demandes médias : Direction de la Communication et de l’Information publique, communications@africacdc.org

ReliefWebReliefWebAfrica Centres for Disease Control and Prevention21 Sept

Banished to alien lands: Trump’s secret deportation deals

After a plane journey in shackles, an Iranian woman found herself in the middle of Africa in a country she did not know existed. She is one of thousands deported from the US on the back of shadowy deals made with dozens of countries. An in-depth investigation reveals the ‘show of force’ costing American taxpayers millions No one would tell the shackled detainees onboard the US immigration plane where they were going. The officers in charge would taunt them when they asked, they said. It was only when the seat-back video screens finally showed a map that the 18 migrants worked it out. Continue reading...

The GuardianThe GuardianLouisa Loveluck21 Sept
  • critical toward Donald Trump · 99%

‘Waiting for us to crack’: In Cameroon, the victims of Trump’s deportations face uncertain fates

Under often-secret deals struck with so-called "third countries" across Africa and Latin America, US President Donald Trump has deported thousands of people hoping to build new lives in the US to countries they’ve never set foot in before. Together with Forbidden Stories, FRANCE 24 investigated the stories of several African migrants housed in a temporary shelter in Cameroon’s capital Yaoundé whose lives have been thrown into chaos by their abrupt deportation from the US.

France 24France 24David RICH21 Sept
  • critical toward Donald Trump · 97%

Deported to Africa: An international investigation into Trump’s migrant policy

As part of a consortium of 26 media outlets coordinated by Forbidden Stories, FRANCE 24 and RFI spent seven months investigating the secret deals struck between the administration of US President Donald Trump and several African countries. These so-called “third countries” have agreed to host undocumented migrants detained by ICE and deported from the US.

France 24France 24FRANCE 2421 Sept
  • critical toward Donald Trump · 78%

World: Locust Watch: Seasonal precipitation predictions in the Desert Locust summer and winter breeding areas (October 2026–March 2027) (20 September 2026)

Countries: World, Algeria, Chad, Djibouti, Egypt, Eritrea, Ethiopia, India, Iran (Islamic Republic of), Libya, Mali, Mauritania, Morocco, Niger, Oman, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, Sudan, Tunisia, Yemen Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Please refer to the attached file. The dynamical models indicate above-normal rainfall across most of northern and eastern Africa and the Middle East from October through December, consistent with previous strong El Niño episodes. Within this region, drier-than-normal conditions are expected to emerge across North Africa by December, but elsewhere the wet pattern is likely to persist through winter. The only notable change in the forecasts this month is that the predicted wet anomaly is somewhat less pronounced in East Africa, and the forecast has also turned drier for Yemen and Oman, because the positive phase of the Indian Ocean Dipole is struggling to become established, and a less positive IOD favors relatively drier conditions around the northwestern Indian Ocean during El Niño. Nevertheless, the pronounced El Niño forcing will remain the dominant (wet) influence. These rainfall patterns can support breeding in the northern Sahel through late summer breeding season. Small-scale breeding may begin in October along the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden coasts. Precipitation

ReliefWebReliefWebFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations21 Sept

DR Congo: DRC | Extreme Rainfall - Simplified Early Action Protocol (sEAP number: sEAP2025CD01 | Operation Number: MDRCD052)

Country: Democratic Republic of the Congo Source: International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies Please refer to the attached file. RISK ANALYSIS AND EARLY ACTION SELECTION Prioritized hazard and its historical impact. The Democratic Republic of the Congo is a vast country located in the heart of Africa. With an area of 2,345,410 km² stretching from 5°30' north latitude to 13°50' south latitude and from 12°15' to 31°15' longitude, it is considered one of Africa’s largest countries. It is a country vulnerable to various types of hazards, including floods, landslides, and social conflicts, and the nature of these hazards varies from region to region. According to the IDMC report, the floods of late 2023 and early 2024 caused 521,000 internal displacements during the first six months of 2024, including 350,000 in January alone. This is the highest level ever recorded for this type of event in the DRC. She said this situation stems from vulnerability and a lack of adaptive capacity, coupled with high exposure to natural events (floods, conflicts). From November 2023 to January 2024, 18 of the 26 provinces in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) were hit by torrential rains that caused unprecedented flooding, with tragic consequences. According to data reported on February 17, 2024, by the National Institute of Public Health (INSP), as a result of these floods, 300 people lost their lives, 839 were injured, and 767,951 households were affected. The material damage is significant: 76,733 homes, 205 markets, 1,528 schools, 296 health facilities, and 138 roads were destroyed or sustained extensive damage that impairs their functionality. Hundreds of villages along the Congo River were also flooded, some completely submerged by the waters. A table is included in the appendices to this document summarizing the risk of extreme rainfall for at least the past 10 years. The capital of the DRC was prone to flooding every five years in the 1960s; this frequency decreased to every three years by 1980, then to every two years by 1995, and now the city experiences flooding every year, with impacts on human lives, homes, and community livelihoods. The torrential rains that fell from April 5 to 6, 2025, in the city of Kinshasa caused flooding, landslides, and silting in 13 of the city’s 24 communes. Assessments conducted by volunteers from the Kinshasa branch of the Red Cross yielded the following results: 13 municipalities comprising 75 neighborhoods were flooded; 136,206 people were affected, representing 20,198 households; 10,756 flooded homes, 1,405 destroyed homes, and 286 destroyed or damaged sheds, for an estimated total of 155 deaths and 40 injuries. In fact, heavy rainfall causes the rivers that flow through the capital including the Nd’jili, N’Sele, Mbombo, and Lumene to overflow, as well as medium-sized rivers such as the Gombe, Funa, Basoko, and N’Dolo, and the Congo River. A population of 17 million people is at risk, and proactive measures must be taken to protect them and mitigate the impact of this hazard. Several partners are working together to ensure effective preparedness, anticipation, and response. Notable among these are the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, the World Food Programme (WFP), the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), and the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), which support the government in various initiatives, including the Early Warning System (EWS) and proactive measures. Explain which risks have been selected for this protocol and why Prioritized risks to be addressed by initial actions and their link to the hazard A risk is defined as a combination of a hazard, exposure to that hazard, the vulnerability of the exposed community or individual, and their capacity to cope with the impact. Exposure and Vulnerability The city of Kinshasa is crossed by parallel rivers that all flow in the same direction, from south to north. These rivers originate outside the city, in neighboring provinces. The N’djili River flows through a 280-meter-wide alluvial plain and crosses five municipalities. Its watershed covers 2,180 km² and empties into the river via a delta with anastomosing channels at an elevation of 275 meters. Records from the Waterways Authority indicate that the highest recorded water level in Kinshasa was 6.23 m on December 17, 1961. The maximum known difference between the highest and lowest water levels is approximately 6 m [10]. Observations of water levels in the Port of Kinshasa indicate that once-in-a-century floods can exceed 5.55 m, once-in-five-years floods 4.71 m, once-in-ten-years floods 4.9 m, once-in-25-years floods 5.8 m, and once-in-half-century floods 5.25 m [1]. Kinshasa has two main flood-prone areas: • Those located in the Congo River floodplain and on the lower terrace of the Kingabwa and Ndolo neighborhoods, of which Kingabwa is the most vulnerable due to sudden rises in the water table, which is influenced by the hydrology of the Congo River; and • those along the rivers in the Abattoir, Des Marais, Ndanu, Salongo, Yolo, and other neighborhoods. The steep-sided rivers originate at the foot of hills with a 20% slope, where erosion cirques have formed; among these rivers are the Lukunga (Binza), Lubudi (Makelele), Basoko, Mampenza, Bumbu, Funa, Yolo, Gombe, and Bitshakutshaku… Populations in flood-prone areas experience impacts related to: • Loss of life • Destruction of shelters and socioeconomic infrastructure; • Loss of livelihoods • Health (epidemics) Priority Areas and Exposure Factors The priority areas correspond to the administrative municipalities of Ngaba, Makala, and Kisenso • The municipality of Ngaba (4° 23′ 04″ South; 15° 19′ 27″ East) has an area of 4 km²and a population of 347,581, representing a population density of 86,895 people per km²2. It is located in the Mount Amba watershed, a geographic location that exposes it to flooding caused by water flowing from the two aforementioned municipalities, a situation exacerbated by the overflow of water carried by the Yolo River, which flows through the riverside neighborhoods in its eastern section. • The municipality of Makala (4° 22′ 47″ South; 15° 18′ 35″ East),with an area of 5.60 km²and a population of 253,844 (2005)—representing a population density of 45,329 people per km²2 , is crossed by the Kalamu River, which originates at the foot of Mount Ngafula. Its geographic location makes it vulnerable to severe flooding from the Kalamu River. This geographic and hydrological situation places it in a vulnerable position. • The municipality of Kisenso (4° 24′ 47″ South, 15° 20′ 47″ East) has an area of 16.60 km² and a population of 500,000 (2023), for a population density of 30,120 people per km² . Part of the commune borders the N’djili River, while the rest is crossed by this same river and its tributaries. It is also nestled on a hill, a location that exposes it to river and rain-induced flooding. Primary Impacts and Prioritized Actions Loss of livelihoods, destruction of shelters, and health are the primary impacts prioritized by this protocol, and early response actions will include the issuance of early warnings, pre-disaster cash assistance, and hygiene and sanitation initiatives, with the aim of protecting livelihoods and shelters and safeguarding human health. It should be noted that extreme rainfall also often has significant medium- and long-term impacts, including food and economic insecurity caused by a lack of food due to crop and livestock losses, as well as the deaths of household breadwinners. Forced displacement, the loss of community members, and the psychological shock of the disaster also cause a wide range of psychosocial impacts. Among these medium- and long-term impacts, food and economic insecurity, as well as deaths and injuries, are prioritized in this early response protocol. Other Non-Prioritized Impacts It should be noted that several other primary and secondary impacts have been identified but not prioritized for this simplified Early Action Plan (EAP). In particular, heavy rains also cause damage to public infrastructure (roads, irrigation and stormwater drainage canals, bridges, etc.), leading to the isolation of communities from markets, health centers, and water infrastructure. However, this impact was not prioritized by the CRRDC because it requires large-scale actions that fall outside the National Corporation’s mandate. To address this, a number of proactive measures should be initiated, including: •Cleaning of drainage ditches; •Raising public awareness ; •Construction of levees ; •Construction of pits for domestic wastewater management; •Distribution of Wash kits ; •Identification of evacuation sites ; •Evacuations.

ReliefWebReliefWebInternational Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies21 Sept

Charlize Theron on ‘The Odyssey’ Becoming Universal’s Highest-Grossing Movie and Raising Millions to Fight Femicide in Africa With CTAOP

Last week, Christopher Nolan’s “The Odyssey” became Universal Pictures’ highest-grossing film of all time, grossing $1.68 billion and counting. “I feel like I got a great invitation to the best party in town, and I don’t know how I got it, but I’m really glad I got invited,” Oscar winner Charlize Theron told Variety on […]

VarietyVarietyAngelique Jackson21 Sept

Why AI is only as good as your data

Dubai: Data is the foundation of modern business, but its value depends on one critical factor: trust. As AI becomes more capable and autonomous, organisations face new questions around accuracy, governance, accountability and risk. Reece Clifford, Public Sector Pre-Sales Manager for the Middle East, Turkey and Africa at SAS, shares his views on the evolving relationship between data, AI and business decision-making, and why strong governance is becoming a competitive advantage rather than a compliance exercise. Data accuracy, trust and reliability How accurate is the data organisations rely on for critical business decisions today? What are the biggest threats to data quality and reliability? How do you define data accuracy in a modern enterprise? Reece Clifford: Before answering how accurate data is, I want to emphasise how important and fragile trust in data and AI is within an organisation. Trust is the reason we worry about data accuracy and is what we try to preserve through our Data Quality and Data Governance programmes. With the introduction of Agentic AI, trust becomes even more critical because it lowers the barrier to entry for many specialist tasks or areas of knowledge that users did not previously possess. When using different providers, a single incorrect answer can quickly erode trust. To answer your question, data accuracy depends on the specific use case. Does a credit decisioning model have accurate, complete, timely, relevant and traceable data? Most probably, yes. However, with the introduction of Agentic AI and its ability to contextualise vast amounts of data, overall data accuracy across the enterprise is not as high. Many organisations have improved their ability to collect vast amounts of data, but the core challenge is ensuring it remains reliable. The major threats to data quality are data silos, inconsistent definitions, incomplete records and, increasingly, poor-quality AI-generated content entering business workflows. What misconceptions do business leaders have about data quality and reliability? Reece Clifford: Analytics and AI only amplify the quality of the data on which they are built. It is a principle known since the inception of computer science: garbage in, garbage out. The primary misconception is that data quality is purely an IT issue. It is not. Data quality is a business-led issue because it directly affects customer experience, risk management, forecasting and strategic planning. It requires collaboration between business teams responsible for definitions and usage, and IT teams responsible for data values and storage. Leaders also frequently overestimate the maturity of their data foundations. A SAS report developed with research insights from IDC found that many organisations are still developing the infrastructure needed to support explainability, validation and governance at scale, particularly as AI becomes more autonomous. How easy is it to manipulate data, intentionally or unintentionally? To what extent does human bias influence data? Reece Clifford : Humans influence every stage of the data lifecycle: what data to collect, which variables matter, how results are interpreted and what actions are taken. Most data issues are not malicious; they are usually the result of inconsistent processes, sampling errors or unconscious bias, compounded by the increasing volume and complexity of data. Because decision-making requires explainability and transparency to maintain trust by reducing and ultimately removing manipulation or bias, investing in specialists remains a priority for organisations. The concept of complete automation is closer through the introduction of Agentic AI, but we are not there yet. Have you seen organisations make major decisions based on flawed data? What lessons were learned? Reece Clifford: Every organisation has experienced some form of a data quality issue, and numerous examples are publicly documented. Overall, given the rapid pace of innovation in data insights, the most important lesson is not to skip guardrails and security measures. This is especially vital when a system or output is externally facing. Data quality checks and governance policies are essential components of these protective measures. Data verification and governance What frameworks and controls should organisations implement to verify data authenticity and maintain trust? Reece Clifford: The best results are achieved when people, processes and technology are combined into a single framework. At a practical level, that requires strong data lineage, quality monitoring, audit trails, access controls, clear business definitions and defined ownership. Governance works best when embedded into day-to-day decision-making rather than managed as a standalone compliance exercise. The most advanced approaches allow in-production issues and errors to be identified and rectified before becoming problems because the underlying processes are well defined. What warning signs suggest a dataset, report or dashboard cannot be fully trusted? Reece Clifford: The simplest warning signs are often the most useful: Lack of provenance: If business teams cannot explain where the data originated, how frequently it is updated or who is accountable for it, trust should immediately be questioned. Inconsistent outputs: Discrepancies appearing from identical baselines, such as two analysts producing different answers from supposedly the same data, indicate an unidentified data silo or process flaw. Black-box decision-making: If stakeholders, such as executive leaders, cannot understand how an AI model arrived at a recommendation, that lack of explainability must be addressed before major decisions are taken. AI is not magic; the appropriate technology must provide transparent explainability and traceability. How can organisations balance governance requirements with the demand for real-time insights? Reece Clifford: Governance and speed are often presented as conflicting priorities, but they are not. Quality checks, lineage tracking, model monitoring and policy enforcement can be built directly into workflows. Modern technological integration has made this significantly easier. In fact, the organisations moving fastest today are often those with the strongest governance foundations. Because they do not build "quick and dirty" systems initially, they avoid paying the price later and can scale subsequent innovation seamlessly. Governance is increasingly an accelerator rather than a barrier. Artificial intelligence and data How is AI changing the way organisations collect, process and analyse data? Reece Clifford: The change can be summed up in one word: automation. AI capabilities and their supporting workflows allow tasks to be completed faster or executed when they were previously impossible. Collection, processing and analysis now happen in subseconds, seconds or minutes rather than hours, days or months. In many cases, human intervention is no longer required. Automating tasks such as pulling data sources, processing documents and triggering analytical predictions in near real time is now standard practice. Tasks including contextualising vast data sources to create expert assistants or generating plain-language and voice-driven insights from enterprise data are now achievable through Large Language Models (LLMs), Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) applications and Model Context Protocols (MCPs). The caveat remains: not all processes should be fully automated. Has AI improved decision-making overall, or introduced new risks? Reece Clifford: The answer is both. AI has undoubtedly improved the accuracy and insight available for decision-making across operational efficiency, fraud detection, customer intelligence and risk assessment. Many organisations have realised measurable value from these applications for years. However, as innovation in the field of AI continues, new complexities introduce new risks. With generative AI, risks such as hallucinations or model bias can lead to incorrect or unbalanced outputs. To combat these risks, new frameworks are emerging, including the progression towards Graph Engineering specifically for Agentic AI. According to research undertaken by SAS, the organisations seeing the greatest return from AI are not necessarily the fastest adopters; they are the organisations that invest in trustworthy AI practices and human oversight. How serious are threats such as data poisoning, misinformation and low-quality AI-generated content? Reece Clifford: They are becoming increasingly significant. As AI systems consume larger volumes of external content, the quality of those inputs becomes critically important. A simple example is the rise of AI-generated images on visual search engines or in property advertisements, which create misleading expectations and erode consumer trust. The same principle applies to organisational decision-making at every level: poor inputs pose a serious threat to decision integrity and diminish trust in the technology. The solution is not to avoid AI. Strategically, organisations must strengthen governance, validation and monitoring. On an individual level, users must consistently ask: "Would I trust the output if this specific input was used?" Can AI be trusted to verify data independently, or is human oversight still essential? Reece Clifford: AI is exceptionally effective at identifying anomalies, detecting patterns and automating quality assessments. However, human oversight will always remain essential because AI is inherently limited by the data on which it is trained. For instance, ongoing discussions about whether AI-generated images should be explicitly labelled demonstrate where human oversight directly impacts policy and trust. At SAS, we view AI as a decision-support technology rather than a replacement for human judgement. The optimal outcomes occur when AI and humans collaborate, with human oversight providing necessary context, ethical judgement and supervision. Future risks and challenges What challenges should organisations prepare for as AI evolves towards real-time and autonomous decision-making? Reece Clifford: The primary area of evolution, and confusion, is automation. Agentic AI presents opportunities for automation that were previously impossible. However, Agentic AI does not equal total automation; just because a process can be completely automated does not mean it should be. For example, few people would want their entire healthcare experience to be automated without human intervention. The human element cannot be ignored in such contexts. More broadly, fundamental questions such as "Who is responsible when an AI system makes a mistake?" and "How do we audit autonomous decisions?" will become increasingly critical. AI governance is a boardroom-level priority rather than a purely technical concern. What risks do organisations face if AI adoption outpaces governance? Reece Clifford: Risks range from operational errors and biased outcomes to regulatory penalties and, most critically, reputational damage. Reputational damage resulting from a loss of trust can define the future of a business. Once customers, employees or regulators lose confidence, the business suffers regardless of whether a human or an AI made the decision. Rebuilding that lost confidence is far more difficult than establishing proper guardrails in the first place. Ethics, privacy and regulation How can organisations balance innovation with privacy, transparency and responsible data use? Reece Clifford: Responsible innovation starts with a fundamental question: not merely "Can we do this?" but "Should we do this?" The most successful organisations embed ethical thinking into every stage of development as a core component of the process rather than as an afterthought. Utilising technology that provides these capabilities natively simplifies the task. For example, maintaining a central repository for all models, regardless of programming language or origin, that automatically conducts performance testing, communicates outcomes in plain language and performs health checks to monitor data drift ensures ongoing compliance and control. Do current regulations adequately address AI risks? Reece Clifford: Regulations are advancing, but technology continues to evolve rapidly. Important progress is occurring globally, with regulatory frameworks in the European Union, the United States, South Korea and elsewhere focusing on transparency, accountability and risk management. These frameworks provide a baseline that all organisations can adopt, even if they are not strictly mandatory in their jurisdiction. Adherence to these standards offers a competitive advantage and lays the foundation for scalable, sustainable innovation using cutting-edge technology. Looking ahead How do you expect the relationship between data, AI and business decision-making to evolve over the next decade? Reece Clifford: The pace of innovation has accelerated so rapidly that predicting where the market will be in two years, let alone a decade, is challenging. However, organisations will continue to push the boundaries of what AI systems are trusted to execute. My team already uses multiple agents to supplement their work, and we continually evaluate whether and how we can trust those outputs and what that means for our roles. AI will not replace humans over the next ten years, but it will fundamentally alter how we work. The faster we can trust AI to perform specific tasks, the faster that transformation will occur: decisions will be made more quickly, outputs will become more accurate and automation will become more widespread. If you could give business leaders one piece of advice about using data and AI responsibly, what would it be? Reece Clifford: Try the technology yourself. The barrier to entry is lowering rapidly; you no longer need a computer science degree to create a model or user interface development skills to build a dashboard. Hands-on experience helps leaders build trust in the technology while understanding its practical limitations. Direct experience ensures technology is deployed responsibly, data is managed correctly and trust is maintained among internal users and external customers. Trust is the foundation that turns data into decisions and AI investment into tangible business impact.

MBMobile BusinessBiju Mathew20 Sept

RwandAir wins Best Airline Staff in Africa at the 2026 Skytrax World Airline Awards

RwandAir has been awarded Best Airline Staff Service in Africa at the 2026 World Airline Awards, presented by Skytrax, recognising its consistently high standards of customer service across its growing network. The award was presented at the 2026 World Airline Awards ceremony in London, where RwandAir was recognised alongside the world’s leading airlines. The award reflects RwandAir’s continued focus on service excellence, with its people at the heart of the customer experience. From cabin crew and airport teams to customer service and operational staff, RwandAir’s employees play a central role in delivering the warmth, hospitality and professionalism for which the airline is increasingly recognised.

Breaking Travel NewsBreaking Travel News19 Sept
  • favorable toward RwandAir · 99%

TotalEnergies and BlackRock Sign $1.8B Deal for African Oil and Gas Assets

TotalEnergies and BlackRock’s Global Infrastructure Partners (GIP) have signed a partnership agreement under which GIP will invest $1.8 billion in capital contribution toward some of the French supermajor’s oil and gas infrastructure assets in Africa. In exchange for the $1.8 billion capital contribution, TotalEnergies will pay GIP a tariff over a period of up to 15 years, based on the assets’ throughput, the French energy giant said on Friday. TotalEnergies did not specify which of its oil and gas infrastructure assets would…

OilPrice.comOilPrice.comMichael Kern18 Sept