South Sudanpage 2

Place · 53 articles
Share

Coverage, page 2

page 2 of 3

UNHCR Regional Bureau for Europe: Sudanese movement to Europe - Profiles, routes and challenges along the way (September 2026)

Countries: Sudan, Greece, Italy, Libya, Tunisia, Türkiye Source: UN High Commissioner for Refugees Please refer to the attached file. BACKGROUND Since April 2023, Sudan has experienced a devastating conflict marked by severe civilian harm, reports of conflict-related sexual violence, and large-scale displacement.1 As of 6 July 2026, more than 11.4 million people have been displaced, including over 6.5 million internally within Sudan and more than 4.5 million Sudanese who have fled the country. Nearly 60% of Sudanese refugees and asylum-seekers are hosted in just seven neighbouring countries, with the largest populations in Chad, Egypt, Libya, and South Sudan. While the majority remain in neighbouring countries, Mediterranean Europe4 has witnessed a noticeable increase in Sudanese arrivals since the outbreak of the conflict. Journeys to Europe are often long and dangerous. Insights from focus group discussions reveal that onward movement to Europe is primarily driven by unmet protection and basic needs in first countries of asylum. UNHCR considers that persons originating from Sudan who cannot return there because of the conflict are likely to be in need of international protection. UNHCR continues to call on States to ensure access to territory and asylum for people fleeing Sudan, and to respect and uphold the principle of non-refoulement at all times. In this context, this report analyses the situation of Sudanese nationals arriving in Europe, including their profiles, routes taken to reach Europe, and risks and challenges faced along the route. The report is based on arrivals data, 173 protection monitoring interviews with Sudanese nationals in South-Eastern Europe conducted between January 2025 and July 20266, and focus group discussions with Sudanese nationals held in Greece, Italy and Spain. The findings provide insights into the experiences and perspectives of participating individuals and should not be interpreted as statistically representative of all Sudanese refugees and asylum-seekers in Europe or first countries of asylum.

ReliefWebReliefWebUN High Commissioner for Refugees18 Sept

South Sudan — Event Tracking Report #114 (01–31 August 2026)

Country: South Sudan Source: International Organization for Migration Please refer to the attached file. South Sudan is currently facing a severe humanitarian crisis characterised by extensive internal displacement. The underlying causes of these displacement dynamics are varied and include communal clashes, land disputes, insecurity, violence, and disasters. The situation is further complicated by the ongoing conflict in neighbouring Sudan, which has led to increased cross-border movements, and an influx of refugees and returnees, straining already limited resources.

ReliefWebReliefWebInternational Organization for Migration18 Sept

South Sudan: Humanitarian Access Snapshot - August 2026

Country: South Sudan Source: UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs Please refer to the attached Infographic. In August 2026, 77 humanitarian access incidents were reported in South Sudan. Violence against humanitarian personnel, assets and facilities accounted for 42 incidents (55 per cent), including robbery, theft, threats, harassment and damage to humanitarian assets. Disruption to assistance. Insecurity prompted an organization to suspend activities in Chemedi, Renk County, and withdraw most staff, with an estimated 33,600 people reportedly affected. In Bentiu IDP camp, violence on 19 August temporarily prevented humanitarian staff from entering, disrupting assistance for a population reported at approximately 120,000. Armed clashes in Ulang on 20 August also led to suspended activities, with an estimated 3,000 people affected. Risks to humanitarian personnel. In the Yei area, abductions affected Ebola-preparedness operations. An INGO-contracted driver transporting fuel was abducted on 9 August and released the following day. On 11 August, three humanitarian staff were reportedly abducted along the Yei–Lasu road while transporting infection-prevention and control supplies. In Mundri East, an attack on a humanitarian convoy involved the assault of drivers and the looting and destruction of relief cargo. Operational and movement restrictions. In Leer, administrative requirements constrained humanitarian operations and delayed a delivery of construction materials. In Twic, allegations of interference in beneficiary selection prompted the suspension of a cash-for-protection activity pending investigation. In Jamjang, a dispute over unpaid incentives temporarily interrupted refugee cash distributions, which resumed following a temporary resolution. In Fangak, insecurity restricted movement between Manajang, Paguir and Barbuoi payams, affecting humanitarian access, supply movements and monitoring, with approximately 1,670 people reportedly affected. The database recorded 12 humanitarian personnel relocated from Fangak. Additional staff withdrawals or relocations were reported elsewhere without complete numerical counts. In Guit, the looting of nutrition supplies and equipment disrupted service delivery.

ReliefWebReliefWebUN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs18 Sept

South Sudan: Monthly Refugee & Asylum-seekers Dashboard (August 2026)

Countries: South Sudan, Burundi, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Sudan, Uganda Source: UN High Commissioner for Refugees Please refer to the attached Infographic. As of the end of Aug 2026, South Sudan hosts 661,529 refugees and asylum-seekers across 183,313 households, settled in 31 locations nationwide. This includes 657,479 registered refugees and 4,050 asylum-seekers. The vast majority 95% (621,766 individuals), are Sudanese refugees, followed by 14,991 (2%) from the Democratic Republic of Congo, 7,093 from Ethiopia, 6,386 from Eritrea, 5,693 from Central African Republic, and 1,550 from other nationalities. In response to the ongoing conflict in Sudan, the Government of South Sudan continues to grant prima facie refugee status to those fleeing their country. Among the refugees, 49% are female aged 0-59 years, and 75% are female and children combined. The asylum-seeker population is smaller and has a distinct demographic profile. Eritreans and Ethiopians accounts for 38% respectively, forming the two largest groups, followed by Burundians (11%), Ugandans (6%), Somalia (4%) and (3%) other nationalities.

ReliefWebReliefWebUN High Commissioner for Refugees18 Sept

Mid-year Program Newsletter - Oxfam in South Sudan

Country: South Sudan Source: Oxfam Please refer to the attached file. South Sudan has launched the new Teacher Professional Education Development Modules aimed at strengthening teaching practice and supporting the continuity of learning in crisisaffected areas. The modules were produced by Oxfam in South Sudan in collaboration with the Ministry of General Education and Instruction and partners, with funding from DANIDA through the Building Resilience in Crisis through Education (BRICE) programme, under the Regional Teachers Initiative for Africa (RTIA). Designed around the realities teachers face in challenging environments, the modules provide practical guidance on inclusive teaching, classroom management and the delivery of relevant, quality education. They are intended to help teachers respond more effectively to learners with different needs while maintaining meaningful instruction during emergencies and prolonged crises. The launch brought together education leaders and development partners, including Omot Okony Olok, Undersecretary at the Ministry of General Education and Instruction; Shabnam Baloch, Oxfam Country Director in South Sudan; Bullen Daniel Parongwa, Director General of the National Curriculum Development Centre; and Ester Akumu Achire, Director General for Inclusive Education. "This document was long overdue, Olok said. Now that we are launching it, our teachers will benefit from it whether they are working in emergency situations or in stable environments. The next step is implementation, so these modules do not remain on paper, Omot Okony Olok, Undersecretary at the Ministry of General Education and Instruction Beyond providing materials for individual teachers, the initiative contributes to wider efforts to strengthen South Sudan’s education system. Developing professional resources with the Ministry helps align teacher support with national priorities and provides a foundation for consistent practice across schools and learning environments. In a country where conflict, displacement and climate-related shocks continue to interrupt education, teachers require more than subject knowledge. They also need practical tools to maintain inclusive classrooms and support learners affected by crisis. The launch marks an important step in making structured professional development available to teachers working in some of South Sudan’s most challenging contexts. Continued training, use and institutional support will determine how effectively the modules translate into improved classroom practice and stronger learning experiences for children.

ReliefWebReliefWebOxfam17 Sept
R

World: Renewed Appeal 2026: a call to close the humanitarian funding gap

Countries: World, Afghanistan, Democratic Republic of the Congo, occupied Palestinian territory, Somalia, South Sudan, Syrian Arab Republic, Ukraine, Yemen Source: International Committee of the Red Cross As armed conflicts intensify and financial uncertainty grips the humanitarian sector, our neutral, impartial and independent humanitarian action remains a constant for people affected by armed conflict and other situations of violence worldwide. Yet chronic underfunding increasingly threatens our ability to help people in a principled and effective manner. In 2026, humanitarian needs have continued to outpace available funding. With four months left in the year, we still face a shortfall of approximately CHF 468 million (as of 1 September). Our Renewed Appeal underscores the importance of flexible, predictable funding, especially in contexts that have fallen out of the spotlight, so help can keep reaching those who need it most. Out of the headlines, still in crisis Most of our top underfunded operations are in Africa – including the Democratic Republic of the Congo , Somalia and South Sudan – where outstanding needs total around CHF 346 million (as of 1 September). Across the region, conflict and other violence continue to drive displacement, disrupt access to basic services and deepen existing fragilities. Climate shocks and disease outbreaks compound these challenges. Afghanistan , where nearly half of the population depends on humanitarian aid, remains our most underfunded operation. There, our teams work alongside the Afghan Red Crescent Society to help conflict-affected communities access food, clean water, electricity, livelihood sources and health care. Other contexts – including Israel and the occupied territories , Syrian Arab Republic , Ukraine and Yemen – face the same challenge: large-scale needs persist even as international attention wanes. In these places, our work includes addressing emergency needs, strengthening water, health care and other essential services, helping families stay together or reunite , and promoting international humanitarian law and the protection of civilians and of detainees . Why flexible, predictable funding matters Our ability to respond to the needs of conflict- and violence-affected people depends not only on the volume of support but also on the quality of the support we are able to provide. Flexible funding allows us to allocate resources where and when they are needed the most. It enables us to respond rapidly as emergencies escalate and to sustain operations in underfunded or overlooked crises. Predictable and timely contributions matter just as much: they give us the stability to plan, strengthen preparedness, and remain present in some of the world’s most difficult environments. Our commitment Whether in headline-making conflicts or in crises from which the news has moved on, we remain firmly committed to reaching people in need – with humanity, impartiality and neutrality at the core of everything we do.

ReliefWebReliefWebInternational Committee of the Red Cross17 Sept

World: Global Update | September 2026: An Inter-Agency Report of the Global ENSO Analysis Cell - El Niño Status & Humanitarian Outlook

Countries: World, Afghanistan, Angola, Bangladesh, Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Central African Republic, Chad, Colombia, Cuba, Djibouti, Ecuador, El Salvador, Ethiopia, Fiji, Guatemala, Haiti, Honduras, Indonesia, Kenya, Kiribati, Madagascar, Malawi, Mali, Mozambique, Myanmar, Nepal, Nicaragua, Niger, Nigeria, Papua New Guinea, Peru, Solomon Islands, Somalia, South Sudan, Sudan, Timor-Leste, Tuvalu, Uganda, Vanuatu, Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of), Zambia, Zimbabwe Sources: International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, Save the Children, UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, World Food Programme Please refer to the attached file. OVERVIEW El Niño is firmly established and is forecast to reach very strong intensity. WMO forecasts indicate a nearly 100 per cent likelihood that it will persist through February 2027, with the event expected to strengthen further and peak towards the end of 2026. Its effects may lag and persist beyond the peak. A very strong El Niño is likely to bring major shifts in rainfall and temperature patterns, increasing the risk of drought, flooding, extreme heat and other weather and climate hazards. These effects will not be felt everywhere at the same time or in the same way. Their severity will depend on where the climate signal coincides with agricultural and livelihood calendars, existing humanitarian needs and people's ability to cope. WMO cautions that the strength of the global event does not translate directly into the scale of impacts in any individual country or region. El Niño is also occurring against the backdrop of long-term climate warming. The emerging risks must be understood alongside conflict, displacement, high food insecurity and high food prices, malnutrition, disease outbreaks, economic pressures and overstretched essential services. These conditions have not improved since the June update. In many places, repeated shocks have depleted household assets, increased debt and weakened the coping mechanisms that people would ordinarily rely on when drought, floods or high prices affect their livelihoods. WFP estimates suggest that up to 50 million people globally could be affected over the next six to nine months, indicating the potential scale of the humanitarian consequences.

ReliefWebReliefWebWorld Food Programme17 Sept

UNHCR - South Sudan - Akobo Update as of 21 August 2026

Country: South Sudan Source: UN High Commissioner for Refugees Please refer to the attached file. ANALYSIS & TRENDS Conflicts across Jonglei and Upper Nile have internally displaced more than 323,000 people since 2025. The latest escalation in Akobo has led to large-scale population movements, with more than 100,000 people fleeing from Akobo and surrounding areas into Ethiopia. As security conditions have improved in some areas, returns have gradually increased. By 1 July, IOM's Displacement Tracking Matrix (DTM) had recorded more than 61,000 returnees in Akobo County. However, ongoing insecurity, seasonal flooding, and the limited availability of basic services mean that many families are returning to highly precarious conditions. Akobo remains a critical humanitarian hub and a key cross-border corridor between South Sudan and Ethiopia, making developments in the area highly consequential for both internal displacement and regional population movements. Separately, in July UNHCR and its partners observed, 8,292 individuals arriving in South Sudan through the Akobo Boat Dock and Dibole entry points from the Tiekidi, Kule, Nguenyiel and Jewi refugee camps in Ethiopia. This represents a 10 per cent decrease from the 9,250 arrivals recorded in June. Children accounted for 60 per cent of arrivals, while 70 per cent of returning households were female-headed and 5 per cent of returnees were aged 60 or above. Many families are returning with few belongings and are rebuilding their lives in areas where services, shelter and livelihood opportunities remain extremely limited. Improved security and family reunification are encouraging returns. However, returnees also cited reduced humanitarian assistance and limited access to food, healthcare, education, water and sanitation in Ethiopia as factors motivating their return. The journey remains difficult. With heavy rains rendering many roads impassable, the Matar–Akobo boat route is often the only viable option, while the high cost and limited availability of commercial boats have slowed arrivals. Families report journeys of up to seven days from Gambella, sometimes waiting for days for transport without adequate food, shelter or basic services.

ReliefWebReliefWebUN High Commissioner for Refugees16 Sept
  • neutral toward UNHCR · 98%

World: We can adapt to anything, but not to war - Delivering for people in conflict settings: Reflections on an evolving humanitarian landscape

Countries: World, Democratic Republic of the Congo, South Sudan, Ukraine Sources: International Committee of the Red Cross, South Sudan Red Cross, Ukrainian Red Cross Society Please refer to the attached file. From the DRC to South Sudan to Ukraine, communities share stories of living through crisis: losing loved ones, fleeing to find refuge, suffering under daily bombardments, surviving without even the most basic services and struggling to rebuild in the face of the combined impacts of climate and conflict. They also tell stories of mutual solidarity, demand respect for their right to live in safety and dignity, and clearly say how they want humanitarians to support them. Today, however, humanitarian action faces deep uncertainty. It has always had to navigate complex local and global politics, but the combination of deliberate and mounting obstacles to assisting and protecting people and precipitous drops in funding makes this moment different. Humanitarian responses are being reconfigured to this new reality. Any refashioning of humanitarian action that does not fully take into account the perspectives of conflict-affected communities and humanitarian early responders will, however, remain incomplete. This report is one attempt to hear these perspectives. It draws on the views shared by communities, a range of National Societies working in conflict, local authorities, service providers, national and international NGOs, UN agencies, development and climate actors, faith-based organizations and think tanks. Understanding how these actors see the key trends shaping needs and the environment for humanitarian action, and the dilemmas they grapple with every day, is essential to understanding how to respond to these challenges. So, too, is understanding the impacts of deep cuts in specific contexts; how these have affected the trust and acceptance of humanitarian actors by communities and local authorities; the impossible choices this is forcing humanitarians to make in how they deliver protection and assistance, and on whom they focus their remaining efforts; and the adaptive approaches and partnerships that are needed to meet this moment of profound change. The report contains key findings and recommendations for key stakeholders – states, humanitarians, development actors – to take real action on our collective responsibilities to communities affected by conflict.

ReliefWebReliefWebUkrainian Red Cross Society16 Sept

World: Food Assistance Outlook Brief, September 2026

Country: World Source: Famine Early Warning System Network Please refer to the attached file. Key messages In March 2027, FEWS NET expects the number of people in need of humanitarian food assistance to be highest in Sudan, Pakistan, Nigeria, Democratic Republic of the Congo, and Yemen, followed by Afghanistan. When food assistance needs are expressed as a percent of the total population of each respective FEWS NETmonitored country, FEWS NET expects the share of the population that needs humanitarian food assistance to be highest in South Sudan, where 50-55 percent of the country’s population will most likely need food assistance. The share of the country’s population that needs food assistance is also very high in Yemen (45-50 percent); Sudan (40-45 percent); Somalia, Syria, and Haiti (25-30 percent each); and Lebanon (20-25 percent). Out of the projected total 155-165 million people in need across FEWS NET-monitored countries, Sudan, Pakistan, Nigeria, and Democratic Republic of the Congo are each expected to contribute over 10 percent of total food assistance needs. Yemen and Afghanistan are each expected to contribute 5-10 percent of total food assistance needs. In comparison to March 2026, FEWS NET expects the number of people in need of food assistance to be higher in Sudan, Pakistan, Nigeria, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Yemen, Uganda, Venezuela, Ukraine, Madagascar, Lebanon, and Angola. In contrast, FEWS NET expects the number of people in need of food assistance to be lower in Afghanistan, Kenya, Mozambique, Zambia, and Burundi. In all other countries, food assistance needs are expected to be similar to last year.

ReliefWebReliefWebFamine Early Warning System Network15 Sept

Kenya: Staying and Moving: Refugee Adaptations to Cuts in Humanitarian Support

Countries: Kenya, South Sudan, Uganda Source: Danish Refugee Council Please refer to the attached file. Executive Summary Deep cuts to humanitarian aid in 2025 mean that refugees must adapt to radically different situations, where livelihoods and hopes for the future are challenged in new ways. How they respond is shaped by the conditions in which they have found refuge. This report explores the adaptive practices of South Sudanese refugees in Kenya and Uganda. Comparing refugee life on the ground in these two neighbouring countries allows appreciation of commonalities under current circumstances. It also provides a clear picture of how different conditions create different possibilities for adaptation. Policy, geography, and the history of social relations contrast in consequential ways. As support disappears, refugees are responding in two modes: either stay in the camps and try to survive through multiple adjusted practices; or move in the hope of food security. Based on ethnographic data from 98 South Sudanese households in Kakuma and Kalobeyei (Kenya), Rhino Camp (Uganda) and Juba (South Sudan) assembled from January 2025 to March 2026, this paper analyses the socio-economic considerations and practices of South Sudanese who decide to stay and those who decide to move to other locations, mainly South Sudan. While rural camps1 in both Kenya and Uganda offer limited livelihood opportunities, subsistence farming in Uganda provides a way to remain in the settlement and survive the phasing out of food assistance. By contrast, camps in Kenya offer better cash flows and therefore better opportunities for small-scale business and casual jobs working for other refugee groups with better access to remittances (e.g. Somali, Ethiopian, and Afghan refugees). In both settings, houses and homesteads are seen as valuable assets: accommodation in the rural camps is free in principle, and having access to a rent-free house is valuable at this time of economic precarity. Cultural and linguistic similarities between the South Sudanese refugees in Uganda and their local hosts make intermarriage and arrangements to use farmland much more common than in Kenya, paving the way for integration and self-reliance. There are important contrasts between the mobility patterns of camp-based refugees in Kenya and Uganda. In Kenya, most refugees in Kakuma and Kalobeyei come from villages far from the border, which makes return cumbersome and expensive, and restrictions on free mobility make short exploratory trips difficult. In Uganda, many refugees travel back and forth to South Sudan to assess the security situation and livelihood options. This is possible because many in Rhino Camp are originally from villages and towns close to the border. Rather than moving with the intention of staying in South Sudan, people evaluate their limited options and decide to go where possibilities seem slightly better for the time being. In both settings, loans play an increasingly essential role in the household economy, to the extent that many feel forced to return to South Sudan to flee their debt. Social networks and connections are a defining factor in refugees’ decisions to stay or move. People tend to stay in the camp because of the support provided by their local network, and they can only relocate to towns if they can draw on support and accommodation from their network. Self-settlement and income generation/entrepreneurship in towns are often highlighted as options for self-reliance in Uganda but are not common in practice for camp-based refugees. They mainly engage in ‘survivalist mobility’ when no other options seem possible or ‘split return’ where the breadwinners try their best to generate income for household members in the camps through casual labour in South Sudan. The debate over how best to transition from camp-based living and aid dependency to self-settlement and self-reliance has moved to centre stage in the wake of these cuts. With this study, we want to nuance this debate by providing detailed ethnographic evidence on refugees’ current practices, motivations and grounds for choosing one option over the other.

ReliefWebReliefWebDanish Refugee Council15 Sept

As needs surge and funding collapses, South Sudan faces its most dangerous humanitarian moment in years

Country: South Sudan Source: World Food Programme This is a transcription of what was said by Matthew Hollingworth, WFP’s Assistant Executive Director for Programme Operations – to whom quoted text may be attributed – at today's Geneva briefing. Palais Briefing Note GENEVA – Good morning to you all. So I am here today to give a briefing on what we are seeing as a fairly catastrophic situation unfolding across South Sudan. Simply put, South Sudan today is facing a sort of a collision of crises, plural, just as the humanitarian resources are starting to run out. I was the country director for the World Food Programme in South Sudan for three years. I left in 2022. And since my departure until the one-week mission I took part in last week, the situation has deteriorated enormously. Across the whole country, conflict, displacement, economic hardship, climate shocks, and the situation in neighbouring Sudan are all converging to push millions of people deeper into vulnerability. At the same time, as I say, we're seeing not just the World Food Programme's humanitarian assistance, but all actors, humanitarian assistance in the country, rapidly declining in scale. 7.8 million people today , more than half the country's population, struggle to find food each day. 2.2 million children and 1.2 million pregnant and breastfeeding mothers require urgent nutrition support. Unless additional resources are secured, more than one million vulnerable people could lose access to life saving food and nutrition assistance by October. So this is looming. South Sudan is also bearing the consequences of the conflict in neighbouring Sudan. Every week, around 3,000 refugees and returnees cross the border seeking safety, food, water and shelter. During my visit last week in Renk, I met women and children and older people who travelled for days on foot, sometimes weeks, escaping violence and uncertainty in order to get to South Sudan, you know, genuinely out of the frying pan into the fire. Many have lost their homes. Most, if not all, have lost their livelihoods and belongings. Sadly, many had lost loved ones. And yet they are arriving, as I say, into communities that are already struggling significantly to feed themselves and look after themselves. One of the women I met, a lady by the name of Hapsa Hassan, a mother of four, who had recently arrived in Renk in the transit camp, fled Blue Nile State, Damazin. And having walked almost 200 kilometres, she reached the transit camp absolutely exhausted, extremely hungry as were her children, and genuinely uncertain as to what lay ahead of her. She did receive food assistance from WFP, she received nutrition support from UNICEF for her children, but frankly it just wasn't and isn't enough to meet her needs. And now, sadly, she's going to rely on the generosity of neighbours and friends and host communities to support her, families and other communities that don't have enough themselves, facing similar kinds of hardships and increasing pressure because of the new arrivals into those transit centres and indeed, ultimately, refugee camps. She spoke of impossible choices that women and girls are being forced to take each day to look for food and basic necessities. Her biggest concern that she raised with me was the safety of her teenage daughter, who she knows is going to need to leave the transit camp on a daily basis to look for work, to look for food, and to take risks that no young girl should be taking and should ever have to face. perhaps a story for me at least was a really stark reminder of the protection risks and the vulnerabilities confronting displaced families as they struggle to survive. Over the last three years the World Food Programme and partners have indeed provided food and cash and nutrition assistance to refugees and an increasing number of South Sudanese returnees going into already vulnerable communities. The assistance has been a lifeline. Today it is at risk. I was in Malakal as well during my visit, visiting one of what was the largest logistics hubs that we had in the northern part of South Sudan, where we would feed half a million people across the greater Upper Nile region with life-saving support. Last year in Malakal at this time, we had 10,000 metric tons of food positioned , ready to go the moment the rainy season withdrew so that we could get food out to areas as they became accessible as we identified vulnerability. Today, there's less than 300 metric tons of food in that same complex, not because the numbers have fallen, not because there's less need, not because things have improved, but because simply put, humanitarian agencies just don't have the resources anymore, anymore that they once had. Access and safety, or lack thereof, is compounding this crisis. Humanitarian food that gets transported along the Nile, commercial food and other materials that get transported along the River Nile, face illegal checkpoints and illegal taxation by soldiers across the entirety of the journeys that they take. This increases operational costs, it slows down the delivery of assistance. And for many traders, it's become so much that it's prohibiting their ability and desire to continue trading. This is at a time where every single pound, every single euro, every single dollar really matters. And these illegal checkpoints reduce our ability to stretch scarce humanitarian resources. It reduces our ability to move assistance efficiently. And when we're relying on cash as one of the modalities of support, it means that the availability of commercial goods is diminishing daily. Honestly speaking, today in Malakal, if a family is eating something other than tomatoes, okra, chilies and onions that are grown locally, anything else they are eating has been flown into Malakal, because it no longer arrives by road or by barge, because it's too expensive, because the transporters have to pay so many illegal taxes on the way. They're just not taking the risk anymore. This is starting not just to raise costs, it's starting to be a cost in terms of people's lives. Even where humanitarian assistance does reach communities, the pressure that's facing those communities is mounting. I went to Canal Pigi in Jonglei State, and I met families whose farmland, seven years after the original floods, is still submerged. Communities that could, in the old days, produce their own food, can no longer produce any food, and they can't rely on the small harvests in the land that is not submerged because of — rather contradictory — a drought which is growing in the area. So surrounded by floodwater, at the same time facing droughts in terms of a lack of rain. Floodwater by the way, that after seven years of submerging is no longer clean, is no longer drinkable, is no longer safe. These extreme weather shocks and the impact of what is a super El Nino is having a greater impact in South Sudan, but also in neighbouring Sudan, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Uganda, Kenya. It's going to have a bigger effect on food security in the entire area. The reduced funding now is exacerbating all these other risks, all these other challenges, leaving fewer families with food assistance, fewer children with access to nutrition support and fewer opportunities for communities to recover from repeated shocks. We are committed to keep doing all that we can, but we do need resources urgently to save lives. The World Food Programme and other partners, other UN organisations as well. If you just look at WFP, we have an USD86 million gap right now, and a USD 416 million gap over the next six months . Without that, we can't serve the refugees. We can't serve the displaced. We can't serve the vulnerable host communities during these six months. And we can't serve those people that are living in fear of famine in at least four locations of Jonglei State. We do, however, also have a significant call to action for the Government of South Sudan. The burden cannot only sit with humanitarian and development workers. The Government of South Sudan has to start mobilizing their own funds to support their own people. The humanitarian community cannot replace the obligations that the government has for their own citizens. They need to take action as well to put their own finances, their own resources — that may mean money, but it could mean food that is grown in other areas of the country that still has the ability. They also need to take action to make sure if those goods move commercially or as aid around the country, that they are not diminished in their impact because of the illegal taxation and daylight robbery, which is frankly growing and has grown so much over the last five years. I'm happy to take more questions. I have to emphasize that while South Sudan is a country that has faced many challenges in its short life as an independent nation, we are seeing something different now. We are about to drop off the financial cliff at a time when the needs are at the greatest level that they've been at for the past 13 or 14 years. Notes to editors: Package of high-resolution photos is available here Broadcast quality footage is available here South Sudan Follow us on X, formerly Twitter, via @wfp For more information please contact (email address: firstname.lastname@wfp.org): Tomson Phiri, WFP/ South Sudan, Mob. +211 928 008 037Azfar Deen, WFP/ Nairobi, Mob. +39 345 846 6425Martin Rentsch, WFP/ Berlin, Mob +49 160 99 26 17 30Julian Miglierini, WFP/ Rome, Mob. +39 348 2316793Martin Rentsch, WFP/Berlin, Mob +49 160 99 26 17 30Nicola Kelly, WFP/London, Mob +44 (0)796 8008 474 Rene McGuffin, WFP/ Washington Mob. +1 771 245 4268

ReliefWebReliefWebWorld Food Programme15 Sept