HeraldLoop
TI

TradingView Ideas — page 26

2299 articlestradingview.com ↗

Coverage, page 26

page 26 of 115

Finer Market Points: ASX Top 10 Momentum Stocks: 16 Sep 2026

ASX:VR8 PSE:ION ASX:TGN MIL:LMG NYSE:MYE ASX:PVE ASX:DXN ASX:AUQ TSX:MRD ASX:JAV Momentum leading shares are the market's best performers today. They are the fastest-growing shares on the ASX over the last 90 days. These companies can't get to be leaders without first appearing on our Launch Pad list. The Launch Pad List is shared on Thursdays and the video interview published after market close on Fridays. Today's ASX's Top 10 Quarterly Momentum Stocks are: Vanadium Resources Limited (VR8) Iondrive Limited (ION) Tungsten Mining NL (TGN) Latrobe Magnesium Limited (LMG) Mastermyne Group Limited (MYE) Po Valley Energy Limited (PVE) DXN Limited (DXN) Alara Resources Limited (AUQ) Mount Ridley Mines Limited (MRD) Javelin Minerals Limited (JAV)

TITradingView Ideas16 Sept

BTC Wave Update | Pink wave Y is still Running

# Bitcoin Market Analysis (BTCUSDT) ## Quick Summary **Bias:** Neutral / Waiting for Confirmation **Current Structure:** Pink Wave Y remains active **Key Confirmation:** Purple Wave W break **Status:** Waiting for confirmation --- # Current Scenario BTC needs to break **Purple Wave W** to confirm the ending of **Purple Wave X**. However, the overall wave structure is still developing within **Pink Wave Y**. For now, I will continue monitoring the wave formation step by step and wait for the required confirmation. --- 👍 If you find this analysis useful, don't forget to follow **MAS Crypto Analysis** for future Bitcoin updates. *This publication is intended for educational and market analysis purposes only and does not constitute financial advice.* #Bitcoin #BTCUSDT #BTCUSD #Crypto #PriceAction #ElliottWave #WaveAnalysis #SupplyAndDemand #TrendAnalysis

TITradingView Ideas16 Sept

XRP Takes a Hit Fed Hikes & CLARITY Fails, But Are We panicking?

👋 Hey everyone, hi and thanks to my fellow rocks for joining in as always! Today we are diving into some intense price action for XRP following a chaotic 24 hours in Washington and macroeconomics, so let's break down exactly what is happening to the charts and what it means for our portfolios. As always, thanks for tuning in with me. 🚨 The U.S. cryptocurrency market faced dual headwinds as the Senate rejected the CLARITY Act in a 49-50 vote, failing to reach the 60-vote threshold required to pass. Simultaneously, the Federal Reserve announced a 25-basis-point interest rate hike, bringing the benchmark rate to a target range of 3.75% to 4%. These developments triggered a broad digital asset selloff, with XRP sliding roughly 10% to trade near the $1.28 level. 📉 Looking straight at the technicals, XRP took a sharp 10% tumble down to around $1.28, completely erasing its recent upward momentum. The immediate focus for bulls right now is holding the line at the critical 50-day moving average, which sits right around $1.21. If we get a daily close below that level, things could get messy with a potential slide down toward the downside support zones near $1.10 or even $0.88, while key overhead resistance remains heavy near the $1.39 to $1.45 range. 📉 Our next technical is that descending channel which we've already been watching in previous ideas. Was helping us out but once we lost our grip it became a resistance rather than a support and following that last re-entry into the channel we managed to break out the channel though that was thanks to sentiment and hype before the clarity act decision. Can see just what kind of impact the clarity act had on the 15th following the news as we quickly exited the channel and saw a steep drop in much of the crypto market and XRP. 🏛 Beyond the charts, the real drivers behind today's flush are coming from major fundamental and macroeconomic shifts. First, the crypto-specific blow landed when the Senate held a procedural vote on the CLARITY Act, which fell short of the 60-vote threshold in a tight 49-50 split, effectively shelving comprehensive federal crypto market regulations for the near future. On top of that, Fed Chairman Kevin Warsh and the FOMC delivered a hawkish surprise by unanimously voting to raise interest rates by 25 basis points to a 3.75%–4% range, marking the first rate hike since 2023 and adding immense macro pressure to all risk assets. We already understand the market favors low interest rates so this definitely is something to keep in mind. 💡 But before anyone panics, we have to look at the silver lining that sets XRP apart from the rest of the crypto market. While the failure of the CLARITY Act hurts industry-wide regulation, XRP already stands on settled legal ground because of its landmark 2023 court victory and the subsequent March 2026 joint interpretation by the SEC and CFTC classifying it as a digital commodity. With five spot XRP ETFs actively trading in the U.S. and institutional plumbing adopting the token, today’s crash is a short-term reaction to legislative delays and a hawkish Fed, rather than a threat to XRP's underlying legal status. ✨ That wraps up today's analysis, and I want to give a massive thanks to everyone for tuning in and staying on top of these wild markets with me. If you found this breakdown helpful, please make sure to leave a like and follow for more daily updates so you never miss a beat—stay safe out there, and I'll catch you in the next one! Best regards, ~ Rock '

TITradingView Ideas16 Sept

GILD - Reversal Strategy Long Setup

https://www.tradingview.com/x/PeCDSoOv/ 🍀Overview I am not a discretionary technical analyst, so I rely on predefined setups rather than subjective chart analysis. I built the rules into a strategy to make the decision-making process more systematic. This setup occurred before the strategy was developed. The trade is documented retrospectively and will be followed until the strategy exits or a discretionary exit is executed according to predefined rules. 🍀Process Ticker : NASDAQ:GILD Date : 11/06/2026 Timeframe : Daily Direction : Long Strategy : Reversal Strategy Strategy Overview : Overview: A Reversal Strategy for Trading on the Daily Timeframe Strategy Chart : Please refer to the 2nd screenshot Signals Main signal: RSI Signals crossed above 30, indicating an exit from the oversold zone. This contributed a score of 0.5 Confirmation signal: NATR Oscillator reached 100, exceeding the required threshold of 80. This contributed a score of 0.5 Signal Scoring Main signal score = 0.5 Confirmation signal score = 0.5 Long setup score = Main signal score + Confirmation signal score = 0.5 + 0.5 = 1.0 Long score threshold: 1.0 The long setup score met the required threshold. The strategy therefore placed a long bracket order. Risk Management Reward-to-risk ratio: 4:1 Entry: 125.87 (the close of the setup candle) Stop distance: 14.00 (approximately 4x daily ATR) Target distance: 56.01 (approximately 16x daily ATR) Order Management : Bracket order Limit entry: 125.87 Market stop: 111.87 Limit target: 181.88 Baseline Assume the worst has already happened: the stop loss has been reached. 🍀Outcome Trade Execution 11/06/2026: The daily candle closed, triggering the strategy to place a long bracket order. 12/06/2026: Price reached the trigger level, and the long entry filled. Trade Status Trading: active P.S. I’m currently applying this strategy to the Nasdaq-100. Let me know which stock you’d like me to look at next. Stay lucky!🍀

TITradingView Ideas16 Sept

XAU/USD — Gold Tests Channel Support: Fed Hike vs. Iran War

Gold is retesting the lower boundary of its multi-year ascending channel after correcting ~24% from the Jan 2026 ATH of $5,598. Price sits near $4,165–$4,265, a key trendline support zone. Setup: 📍 Buy Limit: ~4,166 🛑 Stop Loss: ~3,928–3,936 🎯 Target: ~5,300 (channel resistance) 📊 RSI neutral (~42) — no extreme Fundamentals in play: 🦅 Fed hiked rates Sept 16 (Chair Warsh's first hike) — hawkish, dollar-supportive, near-term bearish for gold 🏦 Bank year-end targets still bullish: Goldman $4,900 | HSBC $4,560 | JPM $4,500 ⚔️ Active US-Iran war — Strait of Hormuz tanker strikes, oil >$100/bbl — live safe-haven driver 🏛️ Central bank buying remains structural support Bias: Range holds = bullish continuation toward channel highs. Break below invalidates. Expect volatility from both FOMC guidance and Hormuz headlines.

TITradingView Ideas16 Sept

Micron’s AI-Driven Boom Faces a Much Tougher Earnings Test

Micron Technology Inc. (MU, Financials) is heading toward its upcoming results with a challenge that is far more demanding than the usual question of whether it can beat Wall Street’s projections. The real issue is whether the AI boom has genuinely transformed Micron’s business, or whether the company is simply enjoying a powerful but temporary upcycle. That question is difficult to avoid when looking at Micron’s third-quarter figures, because the numbers are extraordinary. Revenue rose to $41.46 billion from $9.30 billion a year earlier. Gross margin expanded to 84.9% from 39%. Adjusted earnings came in at $25.11 per share. Those are not ordinary improvements. They represent a dramatic shift in profitability and scale, and they help explain why investors are asking whether something fundamental has changed inside the memory-chip business. Management is now guiding for fourth-quarter revenue of approximately $50 billion and gross margin of 86%. Wall Street is already aligned with that view. Consensus projections point to about $50.4 billion in revenue and $30.89 in adjusted earnings per share. That means simply surpassing expectations may not be enough by itself. When guidance and consensus are already so high, a beat can be dismissed as incremental rather than transformative. The larger clue may instead come from what Micron says about high-bandwidth memory, pricing trends, and its fiscal 2027 outlook. High-bandwidth memory, or HBM, has become one of the most closely watched parts of the AI supply chain. It is used in advanced data-center hardware, and demand has grown rapidly as AI workloads require more memory bandwidth and efficiency. If Micron can show that its HBM business is scaling, that pricing remains firm, and that customers are committing to longer-term agreements, then the bull case becomes stronger. If guidance suggests that pricing is peaking or that demand visibility is weakening, then the market may begin to question whether the current boom is sustainable. Investor Sharon McArd has argued that AI has made memory a more strategic aspect of data-center infrastructure. That is an important point. In the past, memory has often been viewed as a cyclical commodity business, subject to sharp swings in supply and demand. AI may be changing that perception. If memory is becoming a more critical and less interchangeable part of data-center design, then companies like Micron could enjoy stronger pricing power and more durable demand than they did in previous cycles. Micron has also signed about $22 billion in client agreements. Those agreements include take-or-pay contracts, which give the company more visibility into future demand. Take-or-pay contracts are significant because they require customers to pay for a certain amount of product whether or not they ultimately take delivery. That kind of commitment can reduce uncertainty and provide a clearer picture of future revenue. It also suggests that some customers are willing to lock in supply, which can be a sign of confidence in Micron’s products and in the broader AI-driven demand environment. Even so, expectations are already very high. The market is not waiting to be convinced that Micron’s recent results were strong. It already knows that. The harder test is whether those outsized statistics reflect a permanent change in the business or whether they are simply another memory bubble. On Sept. 30, Micron will face that test directly. The upcoming report will therefore be about more than revenue and earnings per share. It will be a referendum on whether AI has structurally altered Micron’s earnings power. If management can provide convincing guidance on HBM, pricing, and fiscal 2027, the company may be able to argue that this cycle is different. If not, investors may conclude that Micron is still a cyclical memory maker enjoying a temporary surge. The numbers will matter, but the forward-looking commentary may matter even more.

TITradingView Ideas16 Sept

Britain Builds Steam Turbines Rolls-Royce Mini-Nuclear Reactors

British workers are set to manufacture steam turbines for Rolls-Royce’s planned fleet of small modular reactors (SMRs), in a move that promises to strengthen domestic manufacturing and reduce reliance on overseas suppliers for a critical piece of nuclear power equipment. Siemens Energy will produce the huge machines for the new generation of small modular reactors at its factory in Newcastle. The turbines will be used in the three Rolls-Royce-designed SMRs that are being built in Anglesey, as well as in further reactors that are set to be built in the Czech Republic and Sweden. The decision marks a significant moment for British industry because it will be the first time in more than 20 years that large steam turbines have been made domestically. The expansion of the Newcastle factory will follow an investment understood to be worth tens of millions of pounds, and it is expected to create around 550 jobs. That combination of capital investment and skilled employment gives the announcement considerable weight, especially at a time when policymakers are focused on energy security, industrial capacity, and the resilience of supply chains. The move also follows concerns raised by MPs that SMR components were set to be built abroad. Those concerns reflected a broader anxiety about whether Britain would capture the industrial benefits of its own nuclear ambitions or simply import the key parts from other countries. By choosing to manufacture the steam turbines in Newcastle, Siemens Energy and Rolls-Royce SMR are signalling that at least part of the supply chain will remain on British soil. Rolls-Royce SMR said the decision by German engineering giant Siemens demonstrated how the company was “delivering its commitment to localisation, driving investment and re-shoring work that would have taken place overseas.” The phrase “re-shoring” is particularly important because it captures the idea of bringing back manufacturing activity that might otherwise have been located in another country. For supporters of domestic industry, that is a central part of the announcement’s appeal. Rolls-Royce SMR is an independent company. It is majority owned by Rolls-Royce, but its investor base also includes Qatar and France’s Perrodo family. That structure means the business combines the heritage and engineering reputation of Rolls-Royce with additional international investment. The company’s chief executive, Chris Cholerton, framed the turbine decision as part of a longer industrial story. “We are building on a remarkable industrial legacy while creating and sustaining the skills and supply chain needed to deliver clean, secure and affordable energy for decades to come,” he said. Darren Davidson of Siemens Energy also emphasised the wider significance of the work. “We’re preparing to manufacture the next generation of steam turbines for small modular reactors, supporting energy security, creating skilled jobs and helping power the UK’s future energy mix,” he said. His comments connect the project to three priorities that often appear together in debates about nuclear power: energy security, employment, and the transition to a lower-carbon energy system. The Government awarded Rolls-Royce a contract to design and develop Britain’s first three SMRs last year. Those reactors will be built in Anglesey, North Wales, in a project aimed at proving the commercial viability of the still-nascent technology by the mid-2030s. Each reactor is expected to generate 470 megawatts of power. If the project succeeds, it could help establish small modular reactors as a viable option for producing reliable low-carbon electricity at a smaller scale than traditional large nuclear plants. Rolls-Royce selected Siemens Energy as its supplier of steam turbines last year, but until now there had been uncertainty about where the key components would actually be manufactured. That uncertainty mattered because the location of manufacturing determines not only the direct economic benefits, such as jobs and investment, but also the strength of the domestic supply chain. The confirmation that the turbines will be built in Newcastle removes some of that ambiguity and gives the project a clearer industrial footprint. The British company had faced a backlash earlier this year after it emerged that some other parts would be made overseas. Those parts included reactor pressure vessels that will be imported from either South Korea or the Czech Republic. That disclosure raised questions about how much of the SMR programme would genuinely support British manufacturing and how much would depend on foreign suppliers. The latest announcement does not answer every question about local content, but it does provide a notable counterweight by securing a high-value component for domestic production. Taken together, the decision to build the steam turbines in Newcastle represents more than a single procurement choice. It is a signal about the kind of industrial ecosystem that Rolls-Royce SMR and its partners hope to create around small modular reactors. The project is still in its early stages, and the technology has yet to be proven commercially at scale. But the investment in the Newcastle factory, the creation of hundreds of jobs, and the return of large steam turbine manufacturing to Britain all suggest that the SMR programme is beginning to generate tangible industrial activity. For the UK, the announcement touches on several important themes at once: the push to re-shore critical manufacturing, the desire to create skilled jobs in regions with strong industrial traditions, the need to strengthen energy security, and the ambition to develop a domestic nuclear supply chain. Whether those ambitions are fully realised will depend on the project’s execution over the coming years. For now, however, the decision to manufacture steam turbines in Newcastle gives the Rolls-Royce SMR programme a clearer domestic anchor and a more visible role in Britain’s industrial and energy future.

TITradingView Ideas16 Sept

NZDUSD | Added to Watchlist

NZDUSD | Added to the VMS 2.0 Watchlist NZDUSD has made a strong bearish move and has now caught our attention. Momentum on the Daily chart is currently around -87, showing just how extended this move has become. But we're not trying to predict the bottom. From here, we're watching price action and structure. We want to see the market begin to show rejection and give us a reason to consider a potential reversal setup. If that develops, we'll move through the rest of the VMS 2.0 process: Structure → Momentum → Volume → Confirmation → Execute For now, this is simply a WATCHLIST market. No trade and no trigger yet. Preparation • Execution • Consistency Educational content only. Not financial advice.

TITradingView Ideas16 Sept

Bitcoin Macro Update: Dual-Scenario Framework & The 2023 Fractal

I jumped the gun... Images Below... Sell-side pressure from both monetary policy (a hawkish 25 bps Federal Reserve rate hike) and regulatory friction (Senate gridlock on the CLARITY Act alongside ongoing SEC enforcement overhang) has accelerated market volatility. High-timeframe market structure points to a structural higher-low retest, where both primary trading scenarios converge on the same execution floor. --- ### 📊 Dual-Scenario Cycle Framework **Scenario A: Macro 2023 Fractal Roadmap (4-Stage Sweep Sequence)** * 📉 **Stage 1 — The Bull Trap & Dynamic WMA Flush ` `:** Price drops lower to flush overleveraged longs, currently hovering directly over dynamic **SHM 63 WMA support ($75,000–$76,000)**. This localized drop acts as a bull trap, convincing weak hands that market structure has broken down before the next rotational move. * 🐻 **Stage 2 — The Bear Trap & Range-High Sweep:** A sudden upward pivot tricks overconfident bears who opened short positions at the WMA. Bulls regain full market control, triggering a rapid short squeeze that sweeps liquidity above the previous **$82,800–$84,000 range highs**. * 🎯 **Stage 3 — Post-Sweep Golden Zone Reset:** Having captured liquidity at the highs, price pulls back once more to perform a deep structural test of the **0.50–0.74 Golden Zone ($71,000–$72,000)**, holding dynamic **CIMA MA support** to establish a rock-solid macro higher-low. * 🚀 **Stage 4 — Parabolic Macro Breakout:** Defense of the dynamic CIMA floor resolves all range consolidation, launching price into blue-sky price discovery toward **$100,000+**. **Scenario B: Direct 4-Stage Liquidation Flush** * ⚡ **Stage 1 — Immediate Golden Zone Flush ` `:** Bypasses the Stage 2 overhead sweep entirely, executing an uninterrupted liquidation drop from current levels directly into the **$71,000–$72,000 Golden Zone** (0.50–0.74 retracement + CIMA support). * 🏛️ **Stage 2 — Institutional Base:** Absorption of sell-side pressure driven by SEC Chairman Paul Atkins' proposed **Regulation Crypto Assets** framework, establishing a tight accumulation floor. * 📈 **Stage 3 — Bear Liquidation & SHM Reclaim:** Reclaim of the SHM 63 WMA traps overextended shorts and converts dynamic resistance back into support. * 🎯 **Stage 4 — Parabolic Price Discovery:** Expansion beyond the $82,800–$84,000 ceiling directly toward **$100,000+**. --- ### 🏛️ Macro Drivers: Dual Sell-Side Pressure vs. Executive Offset * 🦅 **Federal Reserve Monetary Tightening:** Today's 25 bps rate hike and upward dot-plot revision to 4.1% apply systematic discount-rate pressure across all high-beta risk assets, compressing liquidity. * 📜 **SEC & Legislative Friction:** Congress failing to pass the CLARITY Act alongside persistent SEC regulatory enforcement actions reinforces short-term sell-side headwinds. * ⚖️ **Executive Agency Offset:** SEC Chairman Paul Atkins' proposed **Regulation Crypto Assets** framework—offering fit-for-purpose token exemptions and an investment contract safe harbor—provides agency-level regulatory clarity. Institutional capital is positioned to leverage this executive framework to absorb sell-side volume inside our demand floor. --- ### 🛠️ Execution Strategy & Buy Confirmation Rules Price may temporarily drop through the **SHM 63 WMA** during a high-volatility flush. **Do not front-run the dip.** Long entry exposure requires price to push back up through the 63 WMA using one of three systematic triggers: 1. 🟢 **Reclaim + SHM BUY Signal:** Price reclaims the SHM 63 WMA and triggers an official indicator BUY signal. 2. 🕯️ **Full Candle Close Above 63 WMA:** A 4H or Daily candle closes firmly above the SHM 63 WMA. 3. 🔄 **Break & Retest Hold:** A clean breakout above the SHM 63 WMA followed by a successful retest that holds as new dynamic support. --- ### 🗺️ Strategic Liquidity Roadmap * 🛡️ **$75,000 – $76,000 (Dynamic WMA Defense):** **Scenario A: Stage 1 ` **`. Initial Bull Trap zone. Monitor for order flow absorption and price hovering over the SHM 63 WMA to confirm local seller exhaustion. * 🎯 **$82,800 – $84,000 (Bear Liquidation Sweep):** **Scenario A: Stage 2 Target**. Primary short-trap ceiling; key target for taking partial profits on Stage 2 impulse legs before any secondary Stage 3 reset. * 📥 **$71,000 – $72,000 (0.50–0.74 Macro Floor):** **Scenario B: Stage 1 ` ` / Scenario A: Stage 3 Target**. High-conviction re-accumulation anchor where dynamic CIMA support and deep Fib retracement levels align for institutional absorption. * 🚀 **$100,000+ (Blue-Sky Price Discovery):** **Scenario A & B: Stage 4 Target**. Parabolic macro expansion target upon defense of the dynamic CIMA floor and clean breakout above range-high resistance. --- ### 🚨 Macro Invalidation & Full Bull Failure If price fails to hold **$71,000** on a daily closing basis, loses dynamic CIMA moving average support, and triggers an official indicator **SELL signal**, the entire bull thesis is fully invalidated. This combination signals a transition from a corrective re-accumulation dip into a high-timeframe bear market distribution. https://www.tradingview.com/x/6PPHJaUP/ https://www.tradingview.com/x/ZdSKzcfw/ ⚠️ **Disclaimer:** *This update is for educational and technical analysis purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, or trading advice. Any and all financial assets are subject to market volatility and carry substantial financial risk. Always perform your own research, manage risk appropriately, and consult a certified financial advisor before making any investment decisions.*

TITradingView Ideas16 Sept

Crude Oil Futures Curve: Another Temporary Dislocation?

The crude-oil market is once again displaying a sharp divergence across the futures curve. Front-month WTI is trading near $102, while December 2026 is near $93 and February 2027 is around $85. This creates approximately $9 of backwardation between the front month and December, and more than $16 between the front month and February. This structure indicates significant demand for immediate supply, but the deferred contracts are not fully confirming the front-month price. A similar divergence appeared earlier this year. The front of the curve reacted aggressively to immediate supply concerns while longer-dated contracts remained anchored to expectations for eventual normalization. Oil subsequently moved lower as the temporary premium unwound. The current situation has some similarities. Geopolitical disruptions and constrained Middle Eastern exports are supporting near-term prices. However, the back of the curve continues to suggest that the market expects supply conditions to improve or demand to weaken over time. The Fed adds another variable. Markets are considering approximately 75 basis points of tightening over the next three meetings. Additional hikes could strengthen the dollar, restrict credit and weaken economic demand—all potential headwinds for oil. The key signal is whether deferred contracts begin moving higher alongside the front month. If December and February begin closing the gap, the move may be developing into a more structural repricing. If they remain lower while the front month loses momentum, this is more likely another temporary dislocation. Levels and signals I am watching: Front month WTI around 100 December WTI around 90 front to December spread, currently near 9 whether the curve begins flattening the dollar and treasury yields gasoline, diesel and jet fuel crack spreads If oil declines, inflation expectations could cool and Treasury yields could move lower. That could reduce mortgage rates and eventually support homebuilders and housing suppliers. For that thesis, I am watching ITB and XHB—but only if the 10-year Treasury yield confirms the move lower. REITs could also benefit if lower inflation pulls yields and refinancing costs down. VNQ can help track whether the market is beginning to price that transition. On the bearish side, sustained weakness in crude could eventually pressure energy producers, followed by oilfield services, equipment suppliers and energy-exposed regional banks. XLE and OIH can help identify whether weakness is moving beyond crude and into the broader energy complex. The curve was an important warning during the previous dislocation. Once again, it may be providing more information than the headline spot price. Watching closely to see whether the back end follows the front—or whether the front is pulled back toward the rest of the curve. This is for informational purposes only and reflects general market observations, not investment advice.

TITradingView Ideas16 Sept

Webull Expands Futures Offering With CME Nano Futures

Webull, an online investment platform, announced today that eligible customers will soon have access to CME Group’s E-nano S&P 500 and E-nano Nasdaq-100 futures. The addition expands Webull’s existing futures offering by introducing smaller-sized contracts that allow retail investors to manage exposure to major U.S. equity indexes in more precise increments. The move is designed to make equity index futures more accessible to a broader range of retail traders while giving them additional tools to control position sizing and risk. What Are CME Nano Futures? CME Nano Futures are ultra-small equity index futures contracts. They are sized at one-tenth of comparable CME Micro E-mini futures. That smaller contract size is significant because it allows investors to take positions with less notional exposure and potentially lower dollar margin requirements. As a result, traders can gain greater control over position sizing and manage risk in smaller increments. For retail investors who may not want or need the exposure that comes with larger futures contracts, Nano Futures offer a more flexible way to participate in major equity index markets. The launch reflects a broader trend in retail investing: demand for derivatives products that are accessible, precise, and tailored to different account sizes and risk preferences. By offering Nano Futures alongside its existing futures products, Webull is giving eligible customers another way to express a view on the S&P 500 or Nasdaq-100 without requiring the same capital commitment as larger contracts. Management Commentary Anthony Denier, Group President and U.S. CEO of Webull, framed the addition as part of the platform’s broader effort to evolve with individual investors. “Our vision is to ensure Webull continues to evolve alongside the needs of individual investors and the many ways they engage with the markets,” Denier said. “The addition of CME Nano Futures reflects that vision by expanding the breadth of products available through the platform and strengthening our futures offering.” Tanmay Sheth, FCM Product Head – Futures and Prediction Markets at Webull, also emphasized the retail focus of the launch. “As our retail futures customer base continues to grow, CME Nano Futures expand the Webull experience by giving customers a more accessible way to participate in major equity index markets,” Sheth said. “This launch reflects our commitment to enhancing the retail experience for futures and derivatives products through flexible, customer-focused trading tools.” How Customers Can Use the Contracts Through Webull, eligible customers can trade Nano Futures alongside the platform’s existing futures products. They can use the same tools and functionality to monitor markets, manage positions, and make informed trading decisions. This means the Nano Futures are not a separate, isolated product experience. Instead, they are integrated into the broader Webull futures environment, allowing customers to manage their exposure using familiar tools and workflows. The contracts are available to customers with an approved Webull futures account. They remain subject to applicable account, margin, risk, and jurisdictional requirements. That means not every customer will automatically have access, and eligibility will depend on meeting Webull’s requirements as well as any relevant regulatory or regional restrictions. Why the Launch Matters The addition of Nano Futures builds on Webull’s expansion of its futures offering. It gives eligible retail customers another way to manage equity index exposure, but perhaps more importantly, it does so with smaller contract sizes. By enabling positions in smaller increments, the contracts can support more precise position sizing across a broader range of account sizes. That could make futures more useful for investors who want to hedge existing equity exposure, speculate on index moves, or simply diversify their trading strategies without taking on overly large positions. For retail investors, the ability to size positions more precisely can be especially valuable. Larger futures contracts can be difficult to fit into a smaller portfolio because a single contract may represent more exposure than the investor wants. Nano Futures reduce that problem by offering a smaller building block. Investors can then scale into positions more gradually, adjust exposure as market conditions change, and tailor strategies to their individual risk preferences. Availability CME Nano Futures are expected to be available to eligible Webull customers in mid-September. Once live, they will add to Webull’s growing suite of futures products and provide another example of how the platform is trying to meet the evolving needs of individual investors. For Webull, the launch is both a product expansion and a signal that it intends to remain competitive in the retail derivatives space by offering flexible, customer-focused trading tools.

TITradingView Ideas16 Sept

Understanding RSI 50 Level as Exponential Moving Average Trend

Overview: In technical analysis, traders often view the Relative Strength Index (RSI) purely as an overbought or oversold indicator using the traditional 70 and 30 levels. However, the center line of the RSI indicator at the 50 mark holds a direct mathematical relationship with price trend baselines, specifically the Exponential Moving Average (EMA). When RSI crosses above or below the 50 level, it directly mirrors price crossing over its exponential moving average baseline on the main chart area. Key Concepts Demonstrated in Chart Analysis: 1. Price Chart Alignment with RSI 50: The main upper panel displays price action navigating within structural bands alongside a central EMA trendline. Notice how each time price tests or crosses the central moving average, the RSI value in the lower indicator panel simultaneously interacts with the 50 level. 2. Trend Confirmation Signals: Bulish Phase: When RSI holds firmly above 50, price remains supported above the central EMA, confirming active upside momentum. Bearish Phase: When RSI drops below 50, price trades beneath the central EMA baseline, signaling seller control and downside continuation. 3. Precision Correlation Points: Highlighted vertical dashed lines mark the exact points where price touches its moving average baseline while RSI touches 50. These key intersection points serve as high-probability decision zones for trend re-entries, breakouts, and momentum shifts. Trading Strategy Execution Rules: Long Entry Rules: 1. Ensure overall price market structure is bullish and trading above the central EMA. 2. Wait for a pullback where price tests the EMA baseline while RSI drops to touch the 50 level. 3. Look for a bullish rejection pattern off the EMA baseline and RSI bouncing back above 50. Short Entry Rules: 1. Ensure price is trading below the central EMA baseline. 2. Wait for a pullback rally where price retests the EMA while RSI rises to touch 50 from below. 3. Look for a bearish rejection off the EMA baseline and RSI turning down below 50. Risk Management Guidelines: Always place stop losses past structural swing points and maintain consistent risk management. Never risk more than a fixed percentage of account equity on a single setup. Disclaimer: This publication is strictly for educational and analytical purposes only. It does not constitute financial advice or trade execution recommendations. Always backtest strategies thoroughly on demo environments prior to live market deployment.

TITradingView Ideas16 Sept

IREN | Weekly

NASDAQ:IREN — HIEQ Model Quan Analysis | Where Are We on the TS Map? IREN is holding stable along the origin zone of the S up T rend E-line Δ within the projected Primary Trend Ray Δχ . HIEQ-Structure Δ , with its three parallel Sup Rays, has well bridged the Primary Trend from the Flat Correction of Wave ⓸ into the Wave ⓹ advance, initiated through its Minor Waves 1 and 2. The HIEQ-Structure Δ remains consistently positioned to generate the impulsive energy for the extending Intermediate Wave (3), as projected, emerging into the widest infrastructural space of the defined Trend Ray Δχ toward the HPQ Target ➤ $144.4 🎯 | Mid-Late October . #StrategicAnalysis #TrendAnalysis #QuantumEntanglement #MarketInfrastructures #FutureVision #TimeSpaceMap

TITradingView Ideas16 Sept