TI

TradingView Ideaspage 53

Coverage, page 53

page 53 of 115

Gold (GC) Analysis, Key-Zones, Setup for Wed (Sep 16)

Bias: December gold settled Tuesday at 4,332.8 after a compressed 56.6 point session between 4,358.3 and 4,301.7, finishing near the middle of that range, and the exchange-traded proxy closed up 0.24 percent on the day. Holding ground is itself the notable outcome, because it follows a five-day decline of 133.5 points or 2.99 percent and it happened while the dollar firmed and long-end yields pushed to multi-year highs. The metal is caught between two forces pulling hard in opposite directions. Against it sits the real-rate channel: benchmark 10-year Treasury yields topped 5 percent for the first time since 2007 and the dollar index rose 0.14 percent to sit just beneath Monday's one-and-a-half-week high. Gold pays no coupon, so a rising real yield raises the cost of holding it, and that is the mechanism behind a 100-day decline of 501.1 points or 10.38 percent. For it sits an unusually loaded backdrop: an active conflict involving Iran described in trade commentary as now in its seventh month, a crucial Saudi pipeline out of service for three to five weeks, Brent settling at 108.75 dollars after a 2.9 percent advance, and diesel settling at a record 5.2620 dollars a gallon. That the haven bid is not winning against those headlines is the most informative signal this market is giving. When gold cannot rally on a supply shock, a shooting conflict and record distillate prices, the marginal buyer is being priced out by the discount rate rather than drawn in by the risk. The structure sharpens the decision to a knife edge. The settle sits 0.8 points above the 50-day average at 4,332.0 and 1.9 points above the computed pivot at 4,330.9, so the contract enters Wednesday balanced on the only intermediate average it still holds, beneath every other one. The oscillator set is deeply extended, with the 14-day stochastic percent K at 10.10, but the 9-day directional index at 26.48 with the negative directional indicator dominant marks an established decline rather than a drift, and oversold readings in trending markets tend to become more oversold. Bias is lower while beneath 4,392, with rallies into 4,360 to 4,373 the preferred area to sell, though a 25 basis point increase is already roughly 92 percent priced and the 02:00 PM ET projections will set the real yield gold must compete against. Resistance: - 4,416.7 Pivot R3, the outer boundary of the computed ladder and the practical ceiling for any session that does not reverse the prevailing decline - 4,401.8 3 Standard Deviation Resistance, a statistical extension boundary rather than a structural level - 4,389.2 2 Standard Deviation Resistance, the top of a four-reference ceiling that also holds the 40-day average crossing at 4,387.8, Pivot R2 at 4,387.5 and the 50 percent retracement of the 13-week span at 4,385.3, four levels inside four points - 4,372.6 1 Standard Deviation Resistance, the upper edge of the preferred entry band for the primary setup - 4,360.1 Pivot R1, sitting 1.8 points above Tuesday's session high so the pair forms one decision band - 4,358.3 Tuesday's session high, the level a recovery must clear to change the short-term sequence - 4,339.5 the overnight session high, the immediate ceiling and first test of any early strength Support: - 4,332.0 the 50-day average, the last intermediate average gold still holds and only 0.8 points beneath the settle, whose loss on a closing basis leaves the contract under every average on the board - 4,330.9 the computed Pivot Point, effectively coincident with that average, concentrating Wednesday's opening decision into a band barely two points wide - 4,315.2 the overnight session low, the first marker beneath the pivot band - 4,305.1 the computed downside objective from the same level set that produces the pivot ladder - 4,303.5 Pivot S1, sitting inside a tight three-way shelf with the computed objective above it and Tuesday's low below it - 4,301.7 Tuesday's session low, the line whose loss confirms continuation rather than consolidation - 4,293.0 the one-month low with 1 Standard Deviation Support at the identical price, the most important support on the board because two independent methods land on the same number, thickened by the 38.2 percent retracement from the 13-week low at 4,298.1 - 4,274.3 Pivot S2, with 2 Standard Deviation Support at 4,276.4 immediately above it - 4,246.9 Pivot S3, the outer boundary of the ladder, bracketed by 3 Standard Deviation Support at 4,263.8 and the 3-10 day average crossover reference at 4,244.0 Primary Setup: SHORT GC from the 4,360 to 4,373 zone on a rally into the band running from Pivot R1 at 4,360.1, just above Tuesday's session high, up to the 1 Standard Deviation Resistance at 4,372.6. Stop 4,392, above the four-reference ceiling at 4,385.3, 4,387.5, 4,387.8 and 4,389.2, so that a stop-out requires clearing the 50 percent retracement of the 13-week span, the second pivot, the 40-day average crossing and the two standard deviation band together rather than tagging any one of them. Targets at 4,331 first, taken inside the pivot band where the computed Pivot Point at 4,330.9 and the 50-day average at 4,332.0 sit barely two points apart, 4,304 second at the tight shelf holding the computed objective at 4,305.1, Pivot S1 at 4,303.5 and Tuesday's low at 4,301.7, and 4,293 third where the one-month low and 1 Standard Deviation Support fall on the identical price, taken only if momentum extends through the second target on expanding volume. From a 4,366.5 entry midpoint that is 25.50 points of risk against 35.50, 62.50 and 73.50 points of reward, roughly 1.4 to 1, 2.5 to 1 and 2.9 to 1. Half size is appropriate given that the interest rate decision, the rate statement and the Summary of Economic Projections all land at 02:00 PM ET with the press conference at 02:30 PM ET, and retail sales at 08:30 AM ET is forecast at 0.8 percent against a negative 0.6 percent prior. Pricing is likely to be disorderly between 02:00 PM and 02:45 PM ET, and government crude inventories at 10:30 AM ET feed the inflation-expectations channel earlier in the day. A sustained move above 4,392, and in particular an hourly close above 4,416.7, negates the thesis. The standing counter-argument is that a 14-day stochastic percent K of 10.10 is deeply extended and that this backdrop needs only one escalation to force a violent repricing from a market positioned for further weakness. Wednesday is a decision session rather than a trend session for gold, and its sensitivity is second-order but sharp, because the metal trades the projected path of real rates rather than the rate decision itself. A 56.6 point Tuesday against a 14-day average daily range of 106.3 points leaves roughly half the normal daily distance unspent, and the release scheduled for 02:00 PM ET is what it will be spent on.

TITradingView Ideas16 Sept

Market Structure Masterclass: 17 BOS & CHOCH Patterns

Market Structure Analysis — BOS & CHOCH This educational chart illustrates 17 commonly observed market-structure patterns based on Break of Structure (BOS) and Change of Character (CHOCH). These concepts are widely used by technical analysts to study price action, identify structural shifts, and understand how price behaves around previous highs, lows, liquidity areas, and key levels. 1. Bullish BOS A bullish Break of Structure occurs when price moves above a previously established swing high. This can be interpreted as evidence that bullish structure is continuing. 2. Bearish BOS A bearish BOS occurs when price breaks below a previous swing low, indicating that bearish structure may be continuing. 3. Bullish CHOCH A bullish Change of Character occurs when price breaks a relevant previous lower high. This can indicate a potential transition from bearish structure toward bullish structure. 4. Bearish CHOCH A bearish CHOCH occurs when price breaks a relevant previous higher low, potentially indicating a transition toward bearish structure. 5. Multiple BOS Repeated structural breaks in the same direction can demonstrate sustained directional price movement and developing market momentum. 6. Multiple CHOCH Multiple changes of character can occur during uncertain or consolidating conditions. These situations may require additional confirmation before interpreting a larger structural shift. 7. BOS After CHOCH When a CHOCH is followed by a BOS in the same new direction, the sequence can provide additional structural confirmation. 8. CHOCH After BOS A CHOCH following an established BOS can indicate that the existing directional structure is weakening or potentially transitioning. 9–10. Equal Highs / Equal Lows Equal highs and equal lows can represent areas where liquidity may be concentrated. A subsequent structural break can provide useful information about how price is interacting with those levels. 11. Liquidity Sweep Before BOS Price may temporarily move beyond a previous high or low before reversing and breaking structure. This is commonly referred to as a liquidity sweep. 12–13. BOS / CHOCH With Retest After a structural break, price may return to the previously broken area. A retest can help analysts evaluate whether the broken level is being respected as potential support or resistance. 14–15. Internal Structure Internal BOS and CHOCH refer to smaller structural movements, often observed on lower timeframes. These movements should be considered within the context of the broader market structure. 16–17. Structure Within a Range Markets can remain inside defined ranges for extended periods. A BOS may occur when price breaks beyond the range, while a CHOCH can represent a structural shift occurring within or around the range. Professional takeaway BOS and CHOCH should not be treated as standalone buy or sell signals. Their significance depends on the broader context, including: Higher-timeframe structure Swing highs and swing lows Support and resistance Liquidity areas Market volatility Trading session and market conditions Confirmation from subsequent price action Appropriate risk management Educational Note: This chart is intended solely for technical-analysis education. It does not constitute financial, investment, or trading advice, and no specific trade outcome is implied or guaranteed. Past price behavior does not guarantee future results. Always perform your own analysis and consider your individual risk tolerance before making any trading decision.

TITradingView Ideas16 Sept

XAUUSD 1H Chart Analysis | SMC & Price Action Setup

🟡TREND FORECAST Gold is recovering from the 4277–4275 area and has pushed back above the nearby 4305–4307 structure. Short-term momentum is improving, but 4316–4318 is the immediate decision zone. Holding above it keeps the recovery open toward 4353–4355. Keylevel Resistance: 4353–4355 → 4378–4380 → 4397–4400 Support: 4316–4318 → 4305–4307 → 4277–4275 🚀TRADING STRATEGY ✅Buy reactions around 4316–4318 remain favorable if the breakout area holds as support. SL: 4308 (Watch the candle momentum. If the candle moves too aggressively, use the next entry.) ✅Additional buy interest around 4305–4307 on a deeper pullback. SL: 4297 ✅Buy reactions around 4277–4275 remain favorable if price extends lower. SL: 4267 ✅Sell reactions around 4353–4355 remain favorable. SL: 4363 ✅Additional sell interest around 4378–4380 if price extends higher. SL: 4388 ⚠️Note The recovery remains constructive above 4316–4318, but price is moving into overhead resistance. Avoid chasing around 4325–4330. Prefer pullbacks into support or reactions from the marked resistance zones.

TITradingView Ideas16 Sept

XAUUSD — Internal Supply Sell Before FOMC

Gold is trading around $4,326 after a corrective recovery from the recent sell-side liquidity sweep. Despite the bounce, H1 price remains beneath the descending HTF trendline, and the broader sequence of lower highs continues to favor bearish delivery. Macro risk is concentrated around today’s FOMC decision. Markets are pricing roughly a 92% probability of at least a 25 bp Fed hike, while the U.S. dollar remains near multi-week highs. Gold has recovered modestly ahead of the announcement, but a hawkish Fed message could reinforce yield pressure on the metal. Oil has eased after an unexpected rise in U.S. inventories, although Brent remains above $100 and Middle East supply disruptions continue to keep inflation risk elevated. SMC View The H1 structure remains bearish below dynamic supply. The recent bullish MSS explains the current corrective repricing, but it has not yet broken the broader bearish structure. Price is now moving back toward the $4,395-$4,405 Internal Supply area. This is the nearest mitigation zone and the main location where sellers may attempt to regain control. The $4,385–$4,405 Premium Bearish OB remains the higher resistance zone if FOMC volatility drives a deeper liquidity sweep. Main Trading Scenario Sell Priority: $4,395-4,405 Condition: Wait for price to retrace into Internal Supply and show bearish rejection, failed acceptance above the zone, or a lower-timeframe bearish MSS/CHOCH. Entry: $4,395-4,405 after confirmation SL: Above $4,355 and the rejection structure TP1: $4,280–$4,295 TP2: $4,252–$4,268 Key Zones to Watch $4,395-$4,405 — Premium Bearish OB $4,330–$4,345 — Main Internal Supply $4,283–$4,318 — FVG / mitigation area $4,252–$4,268 — Internal SSL HTF descending trendline — Dynamic resistance Above $4,355 — Immediate sell setup weakens Prime Gold View The sell bias remains favored while Gold stays beneath Internal Supply and the HTF bearish trendline. A confirmed rejection from $4,395-$4,405 could reopen delivery toward the exposed sell-side liquidity below. With the FOMC decision approaching, sharp two-sided liquidity sweeps are possible, so the reaction after mitigation matters more than anticipating the first move. No confirmation, no trade.

TITradingView Ideas16 Sept

S&P 500 – Is a Short-Term Rebound Around the Corner?

Market Structure The S&P 500 remains in a short-term bearish structure on the 4-hour chart. Since the recent peak, the index has continued to print lower highs and lower lows, indicating that sellers remain in control. Price is now approaching an important support zone where buying interest could begin to emerge. Market Sentiment - Bearish Although price is attempting to stabilize near support, the overall trend remains under pressure. Buyers have yet to reclaim any major resistance level, suggesting that sentiment continues to favor the downside until a confirmed reversal develops. Bullish Scenario If price holds above the 7,580 support area and breaks above 7,660, buying momentum could strengthen and open the door for a recovery toward the 7,740 resistance zone. A sustained move above that level would improve the short-term outlook. Bearish Scenario If price breaks below 7,580, selling pressure could accelerate and drive the index toward the 7,500 support area. Losing that level would reinforce the current bearish trend and increase the probability of a deeper pullback. ──────────────────── Market Outlook The S&P 500 is trading near an important support zone after an extended decline. While downside momentum has slowed, buyers still need to reclaim key resistance before confirming that a meaningful recovery is underway. ──────────────────── Key Levels First Resistance: 7,660 Second Resistance: 7,740 First Support: 7,580 Second Support: 7,500 ──────────────────── Future Scenarios A break above the first resistance would indicate improving buying momentum and increase the probability of a move toward the second resistance. Conversely, a break below the first support would reinforce the current bearish structure and expose the second support as the next downside objective. ──────────────────── Event Risk The S&P 500 may remain sensitive to upcoming U.S. economic data, Federal Reserve policy expectations, Treasury yields, and overall market risk sentiment. Price action remains the key indicator. If positive news cannot push the index above the first resistance, upside momentum is likely to remain limited. Conversely, a break below the first support would suggest that sellers continue to dominate the market. ──────────────────── Please share your view below: Do you think the S&P 500 will rebound from this support area, or is another leg lower more likely? More market structure and key level updates will be shared regularly.

TITradingView Ideas16 Sept

XAUUSD 1H — EQL Sweep & Potential Bearish Reversal

Gold is currently testing the 4,333–4,340 liquidity zone, where equal highs have formed. From a Smart Money Concepts (SMC) perspective, price may be targeting buy-side liquidity (BSL) above the equal highs before delivering bearish displacement. 🔍 Key Levels 4,333–4,340 → EQL / Buy-Side Liquidity 4,315.7 → 0.618 Fibonacci 4,303.45 → 0.5 Fibonacci 4,250–4,255 → Sell-Side Liquidity (SSL) 4,350–4,360 → Major Supply Zone 📉 Bearish Scenario If price sweeps the EQL/BSL and rejects the 4,333–4,340 area, I’ll be watching for bearish displacement and a move toward 4,315 → 4,303 → 4,250–4,255 SSL. 📈 Invalidation A strong breakout and acceptance above 4,350–4,360 would invalidate this bearish setup and shift attention toward higher liquidity. SMC Sequence: BSL Sweep → Rejection → Bearish Displacement → SSL Target 🎯 #XAUUSD #Gold #GoldTrading #Forex #SMC #SmartMoneyConcepts #Liquidity #PriceAction #ICT #TradingView

TITradingView Ideas16 Sept

Gold breakout risk builds into Fed

Decision day may have arrived for gold, heading into what’s likely to be the first Fed interest rate increase in three years. The falling wedge structure we highlighted yesterday remains intact, with the price pressing back towards the upper boundary after a third consecutive failure to move convincingly beneath the 50-day moving average earlier today. That keeps the lower end of the structure in play and suggests bids are still lurking around that area. While the structure is technical in nature, macro may deliver the trigger. Markets are already pricing a pretty hawkish Fed path, with around four hikes favoured by the middle of next year. My inkling is that the Fed may struggle to out-hawk that. One obvious route would be an updated dot plot that shows fewer hikes this year and next than markets currently have priced. If the decision and guidance amount to a dovish hike relative to current pricing, we could see some relief in Treasury yields and renewed pressure on the US dollar, giving gold a decent crack at breaking higher from the wedge. There are also more aggressive bullish scenarios. A shock decision to leave rates unchanged may deliver a sharpe twist steepening of the curve, while several influential FOMC members dissenting in favour of holding could have a similar effect. Either outcome could provide a meaningful release valve for bullion. While the trigger for a breakout is obvious, confirmation is still required. The key area to watch is the confluence of the 23.6% Fib retracement of the Jan-June bear move around $4,333 with the upper boundary of the falling wedge drawn from the late-August high. A sustained break above that zone would confirm the bullish breakout and bring $4,400 into focus initially, followed by $4,510.80. Beyond that, the 200-day moving average and 38.2% Fib around $4,575 remain the next major hurdles, before the August high at $4,696.80. On the downside, the 50-day moving average is now found just above the lower boundary of the wedge structure. A successful break beneath the latter would question the merits of the bullish setup and arguably flip directional risks lower, putting $4,200 back in play. Good luck! DS

TITradingView Ideas16 Sept

XAUUSD: Support Holds as Liquidity Builds Above 4,440

🔹 XAUUSD is showing a broader corrective structure after the previous decline, with price recently consolidating above the highlighted support zone around 4,230–4,270. The descending trendline continues to define the recent market structure, while price action near 4,320 suggests a short-term attempt to recover. The 4,440 area remains a notable resistance and liquidity zone, where a breakout or rejection could provide further clues about the next directional move. Overall, the chart reflects a developing range between support and resistance, with liquidity positioned above recent highs. 🔸 If price continues to hold the support area, a bullish scenario could develop toward the upper liquidity zone, particularly if a breakout above nearby resistance is confirmed through sustained price action. Traders may wait for clear confirmation before considering any trade. Conversely, if the key support zone fails, price could revisit lower levels as bearish structure gains further confirmation. This XAUUSD technical analysis focuses on price action, market structure, support, resistance, breakout, and liquidity. This analysis is for educational purposes only and does not constitute financial or investment advice. Always conduct your own research before making trading decisions.

TITradingView Ideas16 Sept

COLPAL | Buy @1890 | Strict SL below 1750 | Targets 2200, 2600

********************************************************************* The stock market involves risk, risk, and only risk. To survive in the market, accepting stop-loss with discipline and without hesitation. There is no other way to protect you capital. Any stock I share is either already part of my existing holding or I take a fresh entry at the same level I mention. I always place the stop-loss in my system at the time of buying, and I give the highest importance to stop-loss more than the target. Once the target is achieved, I usually book profit once and then wait for either a retest or a fresh breakout. Disclaimer (Please Read Carefully): This is not investment advice. The stocks shared here are purely for educational and informational purposes. Please do your own research or consult with a financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

TITradingView Ideas16 Sept

DAX Tests a Major Support Zone – Can Buyers Turn the Tide?

Market Structure The German DAX remains in a short-term bearish structure on the 4-hour chart. Price continues to form lower highs and lower lows following the recent rejection from the 26,600 area. Although selling pressure has eased near the current support, buyers have yet to establish a convincing reversal. Market Sentiment - Bearish Despite signs of stabilization near support, the broader trend remains under pressure. Until price reclaims key resistance levels, the short-term outlook continues to favor sellers. Bullish Scenario If price holds above the 25,350 support area and breaks above 25,700, buying momentum could strengthen and push the index toward the 26,000 resistance zone. A sustained move above that level would indicate that buyers are regaining control. Bearish Scenario If price falls below 25,350, selling pressure could increase and expose the next support around 25,000. A decisive break below that level would reinforce the current bearish trend. ──────────────────── Market Outlook DAX is trading near an important support area after an extended decline. While downside momentum has slowed, buyers still need to reclaim key resistance before a stronger recovery can be confirmed. ──────────────────── Key Levels First Resistance: 25,700 Second Resistance: 26,000 First Support: 25,350 Second Support: 25,000 ──────────────────── Future Scenarios A break above the first resistance would suggest improving buying momentum and increase the probability of a move toward the second resistance. On the other hand, a break below the first support would reinforce the bearish structure and could trigger another leg lower toward the second support. ──────────────────── Event Risk DAX may remain sensitive to Eurozone economic data, ECB policy expectations, U.S. market performance, and overall global risk sentiment. Price action remains the most important indicator. If positive news cannot push the index above the first resistance, upside momentum may remain limited. Conversely, a break below the first support would confirm that sellers continue to dominate the market. ──────────────────── Please share your view below: Do you think DAX will rebound from this support zone, or is another downside move more likely? More market structure and key level updates will be shared regularly.

TITradingView Ideas16 Sept
TI

Daily USDZAR pre-Fed

The red range between 16.15 and 16.30 which has supported the pair throughout the year has now flipped from a support to a resistance. This range along with the 50-day MA has limited the rand’s losses after the ECB rate hike and escalated geopolitical tension. Moving over to the Federal reserve, the Fed is expected to hike the federal funds rate by 25 basis points to 4% tonight which could see the pair grind higher to test levels above the 200-day MA at 16.40. I do however expect the 38.2 Fibo retracement level around 16.62 to cap any further rand losses. Given that the Fed is expected to hike, a hike tonight should not produce major volatility spikes in the USDZAR. Additionally, the Fed is not expected to kick start an aggressive rate hiking cycle like we saw at the backend of 2022 which should limit substantial rand losses. The rand has remained resilient on news of escalation in geopolitical tensions which is rand positive. The 2Q2026 SA trade surplus did however decline substantially from a R428.8 billion surplus to R146.4 billion which is rand negative. In summary, I expect the pair to remain between the 16.00 to 16.50 range for the remainer of the year with a possible test of levels below the psychological 16.00 handle. It does however seem like the rand requires fresh momentum to pull the pair below 16.00. This momentum won't come from loose Fed policy given the expected hike tonight. Another upswing in precious metal prices will have to come to join the party for continued rand strength.

TITradingView Ideas16 Sept

BTC 9% Pullback: Is This Wave 4 or the Start of a Larger Correct

——— SIMPLE SUMMARY ——— BTC rallied to 82.3K and then declined roughly 9% to 75.1K. For traders who do not use Elliott Wave, the current setup can be simplified to this: • 72–75K is the main area where I am watching for a bullish reaction • A clear break below 72.2–72.3K would weaken my stronger bullish scenario • If support holds and price reacts well, a move above 82.3K remains possible I am considering spot or futures longs inside the blue box, but it is a relatively wide range. For that reason, I plan to keep position size controlled rather than entering aggressively. The blue box gives me an area to watch. The actual market reaction will determine whether there is a trade. https://www.tradingview.com/x/fBrmyHp6/ ——— SCENARIO 1: WAVE 4 CORRECTION ——— The first scenario assumes that the impulse structure is still incomplete. In this interpretation, Wave 3 ended around 82.3K and BTC is currently developing Wave 4. If Wave 4 completes successfully, Wave 5 would still remain. That would leave room for another bullish move above the 82.3K high. Wave 4 corrections can develop in different ways. A price correction could form as a Zigzag ABC, similar to the cyan structure shown on the chart. Alternatively, Wave 4 can become more time-based. Irregular corrections or triangle structures can consume time without producing an equally deep decline. This is why a correction does not automatically mean that BTC needs to fall significantly lower. ——— INVALIDATION: 72.2–72.3K ——— The first scenario assumes that the broader bullish trend remains intact. Because of that, the deeper price falls, the less attractive this interpretation becomes. The important level for me is approximately 72.2–72.3K. A decisive move below that area would invalidate my current Wave 4 → Wave 5 interpretation. As long as that level remains intact, however, I am willing to keep the possibility of another high above 82.3K open. https://www.tradingview.com/x/ILDYbWmu/ ——— SCENARIO 2: THE ADVANCE IS ALREADY COMPLETE ——— The second scenario assumes that the previous ABC advance has already completed around 82.3K. In simple terms: Scenario 1: A correction inside an ongoing uptrend. Scenario 2: The previous bullish structure has ended and a larger correction is beginning. The main difference is the potential depth of the decline. If Scenario 2 is developing, I would expect a deeper correction than under the Wave 4 scenario. This does not mean BTC can never trade above 82.3K again. There are larger-degree bullish structures that could eventually lead to another breakout. However, those possibilities require a much broader wave count and are outside the scope of this update. https://www.tradingview.com/x/0upv9WlX/ ——— WHY I AM WATCHING THE BLUE BOX ——— The blue box is not based on a single indicator. Several technical factors overlap in this region. 1. SR Flip Levels The orange, green and red levels represent areas that previously acted as resistance. After price moved above them, those same areas can potentially act as support. 2. Channel Confluence The rising red channel and the descending white channel both interact with this broader region. 3. Fibonacci Retracement The area also overlaps with the retracement structure of the larger advance. Together, these factors create a zone where I believe a bullish reaction is worth monitoring. ——— CURRENT APPROACH ——— I am considering both spot and futures longs around the blue box. However, reaching the box itself is not enough for me to enter automatically. I want to observe: • Price reaction • Candle structure • Whether support is actually defended • Additional confirmation if necessary The range is also wide, which means position sizing becomes especially important. Even when an area has strong technical confluence, the setup can still fail. For that reason, I would rather enter with risk I can manage than over-size a position simply because I like the level. ——— CONCLUSION ——— BTC has declined roughly 9% from 82.3K. That decline alone does not confirm that the bullish structure has ended. The main question is whether this is simply a correction within the uptrend or the beginning of a larger corrective phase. For now, I am watching the 72–75K area for a possible bullish reaction. If support holds, another move above 82.3K remains possible. If BTC decisively breaks below 72.2–72.3K, I will invalidate the stronger bullish scenario and reassess for a deeper correction. The blue box is not an automatic buy zone. It is an area where several technical factors overlap and where I want to observe the market’s reaction. The objective is not to predict which scenario must happen. It is to know where I want to act and where my idea becomes invalid. Response > prediction. This is a market structure analysis and personal trading journal, not financial advice.

TITradingView Ideas16 Sept

Japan 225 Holds Key Support – Can Buyers Regain Momentum?

Market Structure Japan 225 remains in a short-term bearish structure on the 4-hour chart. Although selling pressure has eased near the recent lows, the index continues to trade below previous swing highs, suggesting that the broader trend has yet to turn higher. Price is currently consolidating around a key support area, waiting for fresh directional momentum. Market Sentiment - Bearish Although selling pressure has slowed near support, the overall structure continues to show lower highs and lower lows. Buyers have not yet reclaimed the key resistance levels, so the short-term sentiment remains bearish until a confirmed breakout occurs. Bullish Scenario If price continues to hold above the 63,500 support area and breaks above 64,300, bullish momentum could strengthen and open the way toward the 64,900 resistance zone. A sustained move above that level would suggest buyers are regaining control. Bearish Scenario If price breaks below 63,500, selling pressure could increase and drive the index toward the 63,000 support area. Losing that level may trigger another wave of downside momentum. ──────────────────── Market Outlook Japan 225 is currently trading near an important support zone after an extended decline. While downside momentum has slowed, buyers still need to reclaim key resistance levels before confirming a stronger recovery. ──────────────────── Key Levels First Resistance: 64,300 Second Resistance: 64,900 First Support: 63,500 Second Support: 63,000 ──────────────────── Future Scenarios A break above the first resistance would indicate improving buying momentum and could lead to another attempt toward the second resistance. On the other hand, a break below the first support would reinforce the current bearish structure and increase the probability of a move toward the second support. ──────────────────── Event Risk Japan 225 may remain sensitive to Bank of Japan policy expectations, U.S. market performance, global risk sentiment, and movements in the Japanese yen. Price action remains the key signal. If positive news fails to lift the index above the first resistance, upside momentum may remain limited. Conversely, a break below the first support would indicate that sellers are still in control. ──────────────────── Please share your view below: Do you think Japan 225 will rebound from this support area, or is another move lower more likely? More market structure and key level updates will be shared regularly.

TITradingView Ideas16 Sept

BTCUSD: Key Support Test | Liquidity Above

🔹 BTCUSD is trading within a broad descending structure, with price continuing to form lower highs and lower lows beneath the marked resistance trendline. Recent price action shows rejection from the upper part of the structure, followed by renewed selling pressure toward the highlighted support zone around 73,000–74,000. The chart also marks a significant liquidity area near 82,000, while the current structure suggests that price remains range-bound between support and resistance until a clearer breakout or breakdown develops. 🔸 If BTCUSD holds the highlighted support zone and shows a confirmed bullish reaction, price could revisit higher resistance areas and potentially move toward the marked liquidity region. Traders may wait for price confirmation and a clear market structure shift before considering any trade. If support fails, the breakdown could expose lower price areas as sellers potentially gain further control. The reaction around support may therefore provide useful information about the next phase of BTCUSD price action and market structure. This analysis is for educational purposes only and does not constitute financial or investment advice. Always conduct your own research before making trading decisions.

TITradingView Ideas16 Sept

Intel's Bold Rebirth: AI, Chips and Global Power

Intel faces a pivotal transformation in 2026. Global tech demands force radical shifts in silicon manufacturing. Artificial intelligence drives unprecedented semiconductor growth. Intel must adapt to survive. The global economy relies on robust supply chains. Macroeconomic pressures squeeze legacy hardware producers. Memory prices have risen sharply, with SK Group Chairman Chey Tae-won describing them as abnormally high and calling for supply expansion. Data centers devour available global silicon output. This creates immense economic friction. Intel seeks dominance in this new paradigm. The company pivots increasingly from monolithic processors to agile chiplets. This strategic shift redefines global high-tech industries. Geopolitics and Geostrategy Semiconductors dictate modern geopolitical leverage. The US government aggressively secures domestic supply chains, and last year took a 10% equity stake in Intel itself. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick has publicly pressed foreign memory giants to build locally, telling an audience at Micron's New York fab in July that he wants to bring Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix to the United States to build production facilities. Intel broke ground on its New Albany, Ohio campus in 2022 with an initial $28 billion commitment and a longer-term vision approaching $100 billion across as many as eight fabs. After missing its original 2025 target, Intel pushed first production to 2030 or 2031, five to six years later than planned. The site remains strategic, designed to support 14A and future nodes. Korea JoongAng Daily reported in July that SK Hynix was in talks to acquire the campus. SK Hynix firmly denied these specific buyout claims in a Korea Exchange filing. However, Semafor subsequently reported early-stage discussions about an operational partnership, so strategic collaboration remains viable. SK Hynix is testing integration of its HBM with Intel's EMIB-based 2.5D packaging technology, and Samsung and Micron are assessing EMIB as well, reflecting memory makers' push to diversify away from tight TSMC CoWoS supply. Intel leverages government support aggressively. Geostrategy now revolves around localized silicon independence. Business Models and Economics Intel embraces a radically new business model. The company separates its foundry operations from chip design. This bold move attracts external clients, and Intel has onboarded marquee customers including Apple and SpaceX under chief executive Lip-Bu Tan. High capital expenditures challenge traditional profit margins. Building advanced fabs costs tens of billions. Intel Foundry lost $10.3 billion in 2025 on $17.8 billion of revenue, followed by a further $2.4 billion loss in the first quarter of 2026. The Arizona Fab 52 has begun mass production of 18A nodes. Intel pushes the Ohio facility launch to 2030. Joint investment programs spread massive financial risks. Brookfield partnered with Intel for Arizona expansions. Intel monetizes its advanced packaging capabilities effectively. Supplying ecosystem partners diversifies revenue streams. Company Culture and Leadership Management prioritizes pragmatic adaptability over rigid tradition. Decades of monolithic CPU dominance fostered complacency. Chief executive Lip-Bu Tan, appointed in 2025, ruthlessly targets high-growth AI sectors. The corporate culture now emphasizes rapid iteration. Teams race to bridge previous technological gaps. Intel acknowledges its late entry into AI hardware. Leaders implement an aggressive recovery strategy that has included large-scale layoffs and capital expenditure cuts. This requires immense organizational resilience. Managers foster diverse industry collaboration initiatives, and Intel hired Lee Seok-hee, SK Hynix's former chief executive, in June to help run its packaging business. Intel builds partnerships rather than fighting isolationist battles. This cultural evolution ensures long-term survival. Technology, High Tech and Innovation Innovation centers on heterogeneous compute architectures. Intel moves steadily away from traditional monolithic chip designs. Advanced packaging technology connects specialized silicon chiplets. Engineers optimize hardware specifically for large language models. New chips feature efficient SoftMax calculations for transformers. Speculative kernel execution accelerates chiplet GPU performance. Early exit mechanisms speed up neural inference. Sparse neural network inference reduces required computational power. Hardware compression of sparse matrices eliminates wasted operations. These innovations make AI deployments significantly cheaper. Cybersecurity and Patent Analysis Intel's patent portfolio reveals clear strategic priorities. Advanced packaging dominates recent filings, consistent with the company's chiplet and EMIB strategy. AI accelerator filings surged during 2025. Cybersecurity remains a foundational pillar for enterprise clients. The portfolio shows a deliberate security evolution. Intel transitioned from client-side secure enclaves. The focus shifted to cloud-scale confidential computing. Trust Domain Extensions now secure shared cloud environments. Hardware encryption protects critical AI matrix accelerators. Science and The Pharmaceutical Industry Intel silicon supports breakthroughs in modern medical science. The Intel Pharma Analytics Platform, developed with contract research organization ICON under an agreement first announced in 2018, captures sensor data from remote study subjects. Edge-to-cloud AI quantifies therapy impacts objectively. This automation aims to reduce clinical trial costs. High-quality data accelerates new drug market delivery. A notable personal link runs through the leadership. Lip-Bu Tan, Intel's chief executive, serves as board chairman of Greenstone Biosciences, the Palo Alto company combining human iPSC biology with AI-driven drug discovery. Greenstone has announced collaborations with NVIDIA and with Illumina rather than with Intel. Silicon innovation nonetheless underpins computational drug discovery across the sector.

TITradingView Ideas16 Sept

Nasdaq 100 (NQ) Analysis, Key-Zones, Setup for Wed (Sep 16)

Bias: December Nasdaq-100 futures settled Tuesday at 29,246.75 after a 287.75 point session between 29,495.25 and 29,207.50, closing just 39.25 points off the low and inside the lower 14 percent of the day's range. The cash index fell about 0.65 percent against about 0.45 percent for the broad market, and that gap is the entire story. Benchmark 10-year Treasury yields topped 5 percent for the first time since 2007 while crude rose about 4 percent to trade above 105 dollars, and an index whose earnings sit far out on the duration curve is the most exposed asset available to a rising long-end discount rate. Supporting stress was visible across assets, with crude volatility up about 4 percent and bitcoin rejecting 82,000 to fall about 3 percent. The structural picture is heavy but not yet broken. Price sits below the 5-day average at 29,416.75, the 20-day at 29,621.54, the 50-day at 29,577.59 and the 100-day at 29,721.96, while holding far above the 200-day at 27,824.07, so this reads as a correction inside a longer advance rather than a completed trend change. The 14-day directional index at 14.17 with the negative directional indicator at 23.15 above the positive at 15.07 describes downward pressure without trend conviction, which is the environment where computed pivots and dealer-positioning levels govern price. The multi-indicator composite reads 64 percent sell. Dealer positioning in the exchange-traded proxy is the sharpest input: the fund closed at 705.38, beneath both its modeled gamma-flip level of 718 and its modeled volatility threshold of 712, with estimated gamma notional at negative 927 million dollars and put volume running near 1.56 times call volume. Below a modeled flip level, hedging flows tend to extend moves rather than contain them. Positioning data through September 8 showed elevated non-dealer length in Nasdaq futures with about 7.1 billion dollars net sold between September 1 and September 8, so a crowded long is being reduced into the event rather than after it. Bias is lower while beneath 29,545, with rallies into the 29,421 to 29,473 confluence the preferred area to sell, though a 25 basis point increase is already roughly 92 percent priced and the 02:00 PM ET projections, not the rate number, will write Wednesday's reaction. Resistance: - 29,713 Pivot R3, the outer boundary of the computed ladder and the practical ceiling for any advance that does not involve a policy surprise - 29,604 Pivot R2, reinforced by the 20-day average at 29,621.54 and the 9-day and 18-day average crossings near 29,632, so a close above this band is the first real evidence the corrective sequence has ended - 29,588 primary call side ceiling equivalent, translating the cash-index call-side concentration at 29,275 into futures terms at this session's measured 312.75 point basis, where dealer hedging of that concentration tends to supply into strength - 29,541 the 40-day average crossing, the structural reference that must be reclaimed before the average stack can be read constructively again - 29,493 2 Standard Deviation Resistance, a statistical extension boundary rather than a structural level, so a tag without a close above is a fade candidate - 29,473 modeled volatility threshold equivalent, a modeled underlying-price level published against the cash index at 29,160 rather than an option strike, and one the cash index closed beneath - 29,421 the primary confluence, where Pivot R1 at 29,425.50, 1 Standard Deviation Resistance at 29,420.68 and the 5-day average at 29,416.75 stack inside 9 points, the tightest overhead grouping on the board - 29,316 Pivot Point, sitting essentially on the primary put side support base equivalent at 29,313 and forming the first meaningful shelf directly above the settle Support: - 29,207 Tuesday's session low, the confirmation line for continuation and only 39.25 points beneath the settle, which is what makes the weak close actionable - 29,179 computed downside objective from the same level set that produces the pivot ladder, the first measured stop on any break - 29,148 modeled gamma-flip equivalent, translating the cash-index modeled flip at 28,835, the threshold beneath which proxy hedging turns most destabilizing - 29,138 Pivot S1, sitting within 11 points of the modeled flip equivalent above it, which makes 29,138 to 29,148 the single most important support decision band on the chart - 29,107 the one-month low and the structural base of the recent monthly distribution, whose loss opens the deeper standard deviation supports at 29,072.82 and 29,000.78 - 29,029 Pivot S2, reinforced immediately below by 2 Standard Deviation Support at 29,000.78 and the 3-10 day average crossover reference at 29,001.61, making the 29,000 area a dense shelf - 28,850 Pivot S3, the outer boundary of the computed ladder, with 3 Standard Deviation Support at 28,945.50 and the 38.2 percent retracement from the 13-week low at 28,937.99 as intermediate stops Primary Setup: SHORT NQ from the 29,421 to 29,473 zone on a rally into the Pivot R1, one standard deviation and 5-day average confluence, with the modeled volatility threshold equivalent capping the upper edge. Stop 29,545, placed above the 40-day average crossing at 29,541.14 and the two standard deviation band at 29,492.72 so that a stop-out requires reclaiming structure rather than merely tagging an extension. Targets at 29,316 first, where the Pivot Point and the primary put side support base equivalent overlap, 29,207 second at Tuesday's session low, and 29,138 third at Pivot S1 where the modeled gamma-flip equivalent sits 10 points higher, taken only if momentum extends through the second target on expanding volume. From a 29,447 entry midpoint that is 98 points of risk against 131, 240 and 309 points of reward, roughly 1.3 to 1, 2.4 to 1 and 3.2 to 1. Half size is appropriate given the interest rate decision, the rate statement and the Summary of Economic Projections all land at 02:00 PM ET with the press conference at 02:30 PM ET, and retail sales at 08:30 AM ET is forecast at 0.8 percent against a negative 0.6 percent prior. Pricing is likely to be disorderly between 02:00 PM and 02:45 PM ET, a volatility-index expiration at 09:30 AM ET can distort early pricing, and the cash open at 09:30 AM ET sets the session's first directional test. A sustained move above 29,545, and in particular an hourly close above 29,604, negates the short thesis and opens 29,713. The mirror risk is a projection set implying a pause after this increase, which is the condition for a relief advance back through 29,473 toward 29,588. Wednesday is a decision session rather than a trend session, and the distinction matters for how it should be traded. A market carrying compressed realized volatility at 12.40 percent on the 14-day, unspent range after a 287.75 point Tuesday against a 14-day average daily range of 351.59, and dealer positioning beneath its modeled flip level is a market configured to expand rather than to drift, and the expansion is scheduled for 02:00 PM ET.

TITradingView Ideas16 Sept

GBPAUD Will Go Down! Short!

https://www.tradingview.com/x/3QMeVPdM/ Here is our detailed technical review for GBPAUD. Time Frame: 4h Current Trend: Bearish Sentiment: Overbought (based on 7-period RSI) Forecast: Bearish The market is trading around a solid horizontal structure 1.890. The above observations make me that the market will inevitably achieve 1.886 level. P.S Please, note that an oversold/overbought condition can last for a long time, and therefore being oversold/overbought doesn't mean a price rally will come soon, or at all. Like and subscribe and comment my ideas if you enjoy them!

TITradingView Ideas16 Sept