TI

TradingView Ideaspage 92

Coverage, page 92

page 92 of 115

#SUIUSDT – Bullish Triangle Breakout Confirmed | Resistance

#SUI The price is moving within a descending channel on the 1-hour timeframe; it has reached the lower boundary and is poised for a rebound. A retest of this boundary is expected, supporting an upward move. The Relative Strength Index (RSI) indicates a bearish trend, but an upward breakout is likely due to oversold conditions on the 1-hour chart. There is initial support at the 0.6600 level. A key support zone (marked in green) exists at 0.6200; the price has bounced off this area multiple times, making it a strong support level. The price is moving toward the 100-period moving average, which is within close range; this supports a potential rise. Entry Price: 0.7100 Target 1: 0.7213 Target 2: 0.7362 Target 3: 0.7507 Stop Loss: At the green resistance zone. Remember this simple rule: Capital management. If you have any questions, please leave a comment. Thank you.

TITradingView Ideas15 Sept

# GBPUSD Week W38-2026: Yield Pushes Toward 5% Yet Price Holds .

# GBPUSD Week W38-2026: Yield Pushes Toward 5% Yet Price Holds Above 1.34308, Bears Have the Story but Not the Setup | 15 September 2026 **Reference data** | week 2026-W38 - Symbol: GBPUSD - Week: 2026-W38 - Bias: bearish - Conviction: skip - Regime: ranging - FX implication: mean_revert - MTF alignment: bearish_mixed - VWAP weekly: 1.35016 - TrendSL weekly: 1.34308 - Thesis snapshot close: 1.34844 - Current market price: 1.34888 (as of 2026-09-15T05:55:00+00:00; source mt5:GBPUSD.sml:1m) - US 10Y yield: 4.96% - US 2Y yield: 4.63% - US 10Y real yield: 2.6% - DXY: bias=bearish, close_price=99.325 ## L0 - Regime Identification The immediate news backdrop heading into this week is striking in its contradiction. The US 10-year Treasury yield rose toward 5%, its highest level since 2007, which mechanically supports the dollar through the interest-rate channel -- higher yields attract foreign capital into US assets, lifting demand for USD. Simultaneously, GBPUSD fell to 1.3474, its lowest print since August 7, as Brent crude rose roughly 3% and safe-haven demand added a second tailwind to the dollar. On the UK side, July GDP printed at +0.4% month-on-month against a flat consensus, led by a matching 0.4% gain in services -- a genuine upside surprise that gives the Bank of England slightly more room to hold rates firm. Both the Federal Reserve decision and the Bank of England decision remained unknown at analysis time, meaning the central-bank story is incomplete. With all of that as backdrop, the regime reads as **ranging** (confidence 0.70). The FX implication of a ranging regime is mean reversion -- price tends to oscillate back toward equilibrium rather than trend cleanly in one direction. That framing matters because it immediately warns against treating the recent dip toward 1.3474 as the beginning of a sustained breakdown. ## L1 - Driver Stack The bearish case rests on a single macro pillar, with everything else either silent or mildly conflicting: -> ** Fed hawkishness / rising real yield (USD bullish):** The causal chain here is straightforward -- the Fed holds a restrictive stance, real yields rise (10Y real yield at 2.6%), which makes holding USD-denominated assets more attractive relative to alternatives, putting downward pressure on GBPUSD as the quote currency. A rising real yield (yield after stripping out inflation expectations) is the most durable form of USD support because it reflects genuine purchasing-power advantage, not just nominal rate noise. -> **BOE vs Fed rate differential as structural context:** The rate differential -- the gap between what each central bank pays -- currently favors the dollar. When that gap widens in USD's favor, carry trades (strategies where traders borrow in lower-yielding currencies to hold higher-yielding ones) structurally disadvantage GBP. However, the July GDP beat keeps BOE rate expectations alive, partially narrowing this differential on the margin. -> **TGA decline partially offsets USD bullish thesis:** The Treasury General Account fell 12.06% over four weeks to $843.7 billion (FRED, as of 2026-09-09). When the TGA drains, those funds flow back into the banking system, which historically eases USD funding conditions and can weigh on the dollar -- this partially conflicts with the hawkish USD thesis. It carries no calibrated directional score this week but cannot be ignored as a counterweight. -> **Price action, COT, and retail positioning: all silent this week.** Retail GBPUSD positioning sits at 54% long / 46% short (fxssi, 2026-09-15) -- close enough to balanced that no contrarian lean exists. When retail is this evenly split, the positioning data offers no additional directional edge. ## L2 - Macro Snapshot The 10Y yield at 4.96% sits just below the 5% threshold that historically triggers broader risk reassessment -- not because 5% is magical, but because it is a round number that concentrates options positioning and forces leveraged portfolios to revisit duration risk. The 2Y yield at 4.63% produces a 10Y-2Y spread of roughly 33 basis points positive, meaning the curve is no longer inverted in this segment -- a shift that has historically coincided with late-cycle USD strength rather than early-cycle weakness. The 10Y real yield at 2.6% is the figure that matters most for GBPUSD: at that level, the dollar offers a meaningful inflation-adjusted return, which sustains structural demand regardless of short-term risk-off fluctuations. The US liquidity proxy (Fed assets minus TGA minus overnight reverse repo) stood at $5,896.5 billion as of 2026-09-09, up $96.7 billion over four weeks. That net expansion in system liquidity is modest but not negligible -- it softens the tightening impulse from high yields. SOFR minus IORB at -3.0 basis points (FRED, 2026-09-11) indicates overnight funding is functioning normally, with no signs of stress that would force a disorderly dollar squeeze. VIX at 17.10 (yfinance, 2026-09-14) sits within the normal range for US equity volatility -- elevated enough to reflect uncertainty around the dual central bank decisions, but not at levels that historically trigger forced position liquidation. The CNN Fear and Greed index at 31/100 (2026-09-15) signals fear in US equities, which typically supports safe-haven dollar demand, though this is a US equity sentiment measure, not a direct FX positioning survey. DXY closed the thesis week at 99.325 with a bearish bias and a deliberate stand-aside conviction -- meaning even the dollar index itself lacks a clean directional signal this week, which matters because a genuinely strong USD impulse would normally show up in DXY first. ## L3 - Technical Structure As of Tuesday, 15 September 2026 at 05:55 UTC (source: mt5:GBPUSD.sml:1m, near-realtime), GBPUSD trades at **1.34888**. The thesis snapshot close used as the analytical anchor is 1.34844. Two precomputed structural facts define the current technical picture: First, price at 1.34888 is **below the weekly VWAP at 1.35016**, testing from underneath -- by a margin of roughly 13 pips. VWAP (Volume Weighted Average Price) over a weekly period acts as the fairness benchmark: dealers and institutions use it to assess whether their fills are above or below the week's average cost. Price testing from below the weekly VWAP means sellers currently have the structural advantage at this timeframe, but price has not reclaimed that level. Second, price at 1.34888 is **above the weekly TrendSL at 1.34308**, testing from above -- a gap of approximately 58 pips. The TrendSL (trend stop-loss level) is the threshold below which the medium-term trend structure would flip to confirmed bearish. The fact that price remains above it means the bearish directional label is **not yet confirmed by the technical structure**. This is an existing reality at the time of writing, not a hypothetical. The multi-timeframe alignment reads as bearish-mixed, which in practice means lower timeframes are leaning bearish but higher timeframes have not confirmed -- a setup where momentum traders and trend followers can find themselves on opposite sides of the same trade. ## L4 - Intermarket Cross-Check The DXY cross-reference is instructive. DXY carries a bearish bias with a stand-aside conviction at a close of 99.325 for the week. That combination -- bearish DXY but no actionable setup -- creates a direct tension with the GBPUSD bearish thesis. If the dollar index itself lacks enough confirmation to size a directional position, the case for aggressive GBPUSD shorts built primarily on USD strength becomes harder to defend. A weaker DXY, all else equal, would support GBPUSD rather than press it lower. The multi-timeframe alignment on GBPUSD reads bearish-mixed (mean_revert FX implication). In practical terms, bearish-mixed alignment means the trade idea and the timeframe structure are not in agreement across all horizons -- which historically raises the probability of whipsaws and false breaks. Traders who see the bearish narrative clearly and act on it in isolation, without waiting for timeframe convergence, are most exposed to that whipsaw risk. The mean-revert implication reinforces the ranging regime: any sharp move lower may attract buying interest before a sustained trend develops, and any sharp move higher may be sold back toward the weekly equilibrium. ## L5 - Event Risk This week carries two central bank decisions that will directly determine whether the rate differential story evolves or stalls. All dates below are sourced from ForexFactory calendar data (secondary source, not direct official issuer confirmation): -> UK Claimant Count Change: 15/09/2026 -> UK CPI y/y: 16/09/2026 -> Federal Funds Rate decision: 16/09/2026 -> FOMC Economic Projections: 16/09/2026 -> FOMC Statement: 16/09/2026 -> FOMC Press Conference: 16/09/2026 -> MPC Official Bank Rate Votes: 17/09/2026 -> Official Bank Rate (BOE): 17/09/2026 -> Monetary Policy Summary (BOE): 17/09/2026 | Scenario | Probability | |---|---| | Fed holds, signals fewer cuts in dot plot; BOE holds with hawkish language -- rate differential narrows, GBPUSD recovers toward VWAP | Plausible, consistent with ranging regime | | Fed holds, Powell signals prolonged restrictive stance; BOE cuts or signals cuts -- differential widens, bears get structural confirmation below 1.34308 | Bearish confirmation scenario | | Fed surprises with a cut or strong dovish pivot; BOE holds -- GBP outperforms sharply, bearish thesis collapses | Low probability but tail risk; both outcomes were unknown at analysis time | | Both central banks hold with neutral language -- no resolution, ranging continues, price oscillates between 1.34308 and 1.35016 | Consistent with current regime | Note that both outcomes remained unknown at analysis time. Any positioning taken before these decisions carries binary event risk -- the pair's next 150-200 pip move is effectively locked inside the Fed and BOE announcements on 16-17 September. ## L6 - Conviction Scorecard The overall bias is bearish, but the honest framing of this week's read is that the evidence is not yet convincing enough to size a directional position. The entire bearish case rests on the Fed hawkish / rising real yield signal. Price action contributes nothing confirming. COT data (institutional positioning, which is a lagged survey of futures participants -- note the brief does not specify the exact report week, net-position figure, or release date, so treat it as directional context only) is silent. The DXY itself carries a stand-aside read. Retail positioning is balanced. The technical structure has price above the level that would provide genuine bearish confirmation. That accumulation of non-confirmation is the story -- not a low score on a confidence scale, but a deliberate analytical choice to stand aside until one of the scenarios in L5 resolves. ## L7 - Time Horizon **Near-term (into 16-17 September):** Price at 1.34888 is sandwiched between the weekly TrendSL at 1.34308 below and the weekly VWAP at 1.35016 above, testing underneath the VWAP. Within this window, the Fed and BOE decisions dominate. Direction is essentially binary and event-driven. The mean-revert regime implies that sharp pre-event moves in either direction may partially reverse once the catalyst lands. **2-week horizon (the stated timeline):** If the Fed delivers a hawkish hold with a revised dot plot signaling fewer cuts, the rate differential widens and the bearish thesis gains its first technical confirmation if the weekly close drops below 1.34308. That would be the first moment the bearish label aligns with the price structure. Until then, the ranging regime contains the move. **Medium-term (beyond 2 weeks):** The July UK GDP beat at +0.4% month-on-month is a genuine fundamental counterweight. If the BOE uses it as justification to maintain or raise rates, the rate differential could begin compressing, which would shift the structural bias back toward GBPUSD stability or modest recovery. The medium-term picture depends heavily on whether the 10Y yield sustaining near 5% creates contagion effects (equity stress, credit spread widening) that paradoxically weaken the dollar through risk-off carry unwinds -- a carry unwind being the rapid unwinding of positions where traders borrowed in low-yielding currencies to hold USD assets, which sells USD in the process. ## L8 - Invalidation Conditions -> ** ** Price at 1.34888 is already above the weekly TrendSL at 1.34308. The technical structure contradicts the bearish bias from the outset. The bearish label reflects a macro-driven framework override, not a technically confirmed setup. Treat it accordingly. -> ** ** A weekly close below the TrendSL weekly at 1.34308 would provide the first genuine bearish structural confirmation -- aligning the technical picture with the directional label for the first time this cycle. Without that confirmation, the bearish thesis remains macro-only. -> ** ** Price sustained above the weekly VWAP at 1.35016 would represent short-term momentum moving against the thesis. Readers not currently positioned should wait to see how price resolves around the VWAP before assessing directional exposure. Readers already holding short exposure should reassess their own risk against the 1.34308 and 1.35016 levels as the two structural boundaries that define the current range. **The trader trap this week:** Reading the bearish narrative correctly -- rising yields, hawkish Fed, rate differential favoring USD -- and then entering short before either central bank decision, only to get caught in the BOE or FOMC reaction move that temporarily sends price back through the weekly VWAP at 1.35016. The direction may ultimately prove right over two weeks; the timing around back-to-back central bank events on 16-17 September is where correctly-biased traders historically absorb the most unnecessary drawdown. The ranging regime and mean-revert implication mean the pair can spike 80-100 pips in either direction on the headlines before resuming any underlying trend -- and that spike is where stops get taken before the move resumes. --- *This analysis is for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice.* #GBPUSD #ForexTrading #FXAnalysis #CableForex #USDStrength #BankOfEngland #FederalReserve #FOMC #InterestRates #RealYield #ForexWeekly #MacroFX #CentralBanks #FXRegime #TradingView

TITradingView Ideas15 Sept

$SOL — Descending Trendline Under Pressure

SOL is still moving below a clear descending trendline, and that trendline has already rejected price several times. The structure is now getting tighter near the lower part of the channel, so the next reaction is important. I’m watching for a clean bullish break rather than chasing inside the trendline. For the bullish move to become valid, I want to see a strong bullish 4H candle break and close above the descending trendline, backed by clear volume expansion. RSI is currently around the neutral area, so I’d like to see RSI turn higher and move above its MA as momentum shifts to buyers. A successful retest and hold above the broken trendline would add stronger confirmation. If SOL gets rejected again, the bullish idea is delayed and another move toward support remains possible.

TITradingView Ideas15 Sept

UKOIL | Now what?

By examining the weekly chart of Brent Oil we can see that it opened with a premium gap, opening at 107.11 while it closed at 104.31 last week, and after the opening, it went as high as 109.80 level, and then dropped, currently being traded at around 107.40. Considering the geopolitical tensions, President Trump saying they have the control of the Strait of Hormuz while the IR claims they have closed the Strait of Hormuz, Oil is fluctuating in price. Now, if US and IR attack each other once more, Oil is likely to go higher towards the 119.50 level to sweep the major Buyside Liquidity pool above there and then go towards the Bullish Rejection Block, possibly breaking above it and reach above 138.03 Level. Also considering the Houthis' attack on Saudi Arabia's Oil lifeline, Oil could go higher. However, if the US and IR go back to negotiations, as President Trump claims that the IR wants a deal so bad, Oil could drop below the $100 mark. However, it's all speculations for now and we gotta wait and see how the events take place in the coming days.

TITradingView Ideas15 Sept

Crypto Leverage Explained: How Much Leverage Should You Actually

Leverage lets a trader control a position larger than the capital actually deposited. On a one hour Bitcoin chart, price often moves a small percentage within a single candle. Without leverage, that movement translates into a proportionally small change in account value. Leverage exists to make that movement meaningful, but the amount used determines whether a normal price swing becomes a manageable event or an account-ending one. The right leverage is not a fixed number. It depends on volatility, stop placement, and how much error the position can absorb before being forced out. Why this exists: Markets do not move in straight lines toward a trader's thesis. They move a little, in short bursts, most of the time. Leverage was built to let capital participate meaningfully in those smaller moves rather than requiring the full notional value of a position upfront. How it actually works: Higher leverage does not increase the odds of being right. It reduces the distance price needs to travel against the position before margin is exhausted. A ten times leveraged position tolerates roughly a tenth of the adverse move that an unleveraged position could absorb before liquidation. The stop loss, not the leverage figure, is what defines the real risk on any single trade. Leverage simply determines how much capital sits behind that stop. Where this shows up: A one hour BTCUSDT chart typically shows repeated expansion and contraction in volatility, periods of tight consolidation followed by sharper directional moves. During the tight phases, high leverage can survive small pullbacks. During expansion phases, the same leverage that felt safe an hour earlier can be liquidated by a single wick. A common misconception: Many traders equate leverage with risk taken, when the real variable is position size relative to account equity and stop distance. Two traders using the same leverage can carry very different risk if one places a wider stop and sizes down accordingly. Professional perspective: Experienced traders tend to size leverage to volatility rather than to conviction. Conviction affects whether a trade is taken, not how much capital risk it should carry. This separates confidence in an idea from certainty about its outcome, which are never the same thing. Trade-offs to weigh: Higher leverage improves capital efficiency and frees up funds for other positions, but it shrinks the room for error and increases the emotional pressure of watching a trade in real time. Lower leverage reduces liquidation risk but ties up more capital per idea and can dull the incentive to manage the trade actively. What should change going forward: Before opening a position, the useful question is not "how much leverage can this exchange offer" but "what stop distance does this setup require, and what leverage keeps that stop survivable." Funding providers and evaluation programs generally size risk the same way, treating drawdown limits as a constraint on position sizing rather than an afterthought. In practice, leverage decisions start with the stop, not the multiplier. Volatility conditions, not habit, should set the ceiling on how much leverage gets used on any given trade. Next lesson: how stop placement and position sizing interact to define real risk per trade.

TITradingView Ideas15 Sept

XAUUSD | TRADING PLAN H1 15/09/2026

✅ XAUUSD/H1 - Gold is still maintaining a bearish structure, continuously forming Lower High – Lower Low patterns. At the same time, price is trading below the EMA trend structure and has failed to break out of the Supply Zone (4312 - 4318) + FIBO, indicating that sellers are still in control. 1. SELL SCENARIO - Price is forming a sideways range around (428x - 431x) and has retested the Supply Zone (4312 - 4318), then started selling off again and is approaching the Support around 428x. - If price continues to move sideways within this range and retests the Supply Zone (4312 - 4318), monitor the price reaction. If price continues to reject the breakout and selling pressure returns (M5 - M15), a continuation sell setup can be considered, targeting 430x - 428x. - If price pulls back and breaks below the Support at 428x, with an H1 candle closing below this area, a continuation sell setup can be considered, targeting 427x - Demand Zone (4250 - 4257). => Selling momentum could expand further if price fully breaks below the Demand Zone (4250 - 4257). If the H1 candle confirms the breakout, the next downside targets are 423x - 420x. 2. BUY SCENARIO - If price reacts strongly at the Demand Zone (4250 - 4257) and shows clear reversal signals, a short-term Buy can be considered, targeting 426x - 428x. - If price moves sideways and then rallies strongly, breaking out and closing an H1 candle above the Supply Zone (4312 - 4318), the short-term bearish structure will weaken and may open a short-term upside move toward the Key Resistance (4352 - 4359). => If price tests the Key Resistance (4352 - 4359) but fails to break out and selling pressure returns, a sell setup can be considered back toward the downside. If price breaks out decisively, buying momentum could regain control. 🔴 KEY LEVELS Supply Zone (4312 - 4318) + FIBO + EMA Resistance 433x Key Resistance (4352 - 4359) Support 428x Demand Zone (4250 - 4257)

TITradingView Ideas15 Sept

XAU/USD 15M: Buy Zone Reversal Setup → Target 4,351

XAU/USD 15-Minute Technical Analysis Current price: ~4,291.88 Market structure: Price is trading inside an ascending channel after the earlier sell-off. The short-term structure remains bullish while the channel’s lower boundary holds. Buy zone: 4,268.98–4,283.06. This area aligns with the channel support and the marked demand/buy zone. Resistance: 4,310–4,320 is the key near-term resistance/sell zone. A clean 15-min breakout and close above it could open the way toward higher levels. Target: 4,351.12–4,351.38, matching the chart’s projected target. Stop loss: 4,268.78. A sustained break below this level would invalidate the bullish setup. Liquidity: The recent highs around 4,315–4,320 are the main upside liquidity area. Price may need to sweep/break this zone before continuing toward the target. Trade idea: The setup favors buying a pullback into 4,269–4,283, rather than chasing price around 4,292. Confirmation from bullish candles/rejection in the buy zone would strengthen the entry. Bullish trigger: 15-min close above 4,320 → continuation toward 4,340 → 4,351. Bearish invalidation: Break below 4,269 → bullish setup weakened, with risk of a deeper retracement.

TITradingView Ideas15 Sept
TI

Gold Analysis - Key Levels to Watch 4690 or 4000 After FOMC?

Technically the daily chart still shows a bearish structure below the descending trendline. Gold has already rejected the 4690-4700 region and moved lower toward the current 4295 area. 4420-4450 is an important resistance zone while the price around 4497-4523 provide the next major resistance supply area. As long as Gold remains below this resistance structure rallies can continue to attract sellers. On the downside 4252 is the first important support, a sustained break below it would increase the probability of a move toward 4200 followed by the major demand zone around 4084-3980. The ascending trendline is also approaching this lower support area making 4084-3980 an important decision zone for the larger bullish structure. Gold remains under pressure as the market prepares for the September FOMC decision tomorrow September16. The Federal Reserve is coming into this meeting with inflation still uncomfortable while recent US data has increased expectations for tighter policy. August CPI showed renewed price pressure and the latest market pricing-economist surveys have moved strongly toward a 25 basis point hike to 3.75%-4.00% compared with the current 3.50%-3.75% range. The main risk for Gold is therefore not only the rate decision itself but also Fed Chair Kevin Warsh's statement, the updated projections, dot plot and guidance for future hikes. A hawkish Fed stronger USD and higher Treasury yields could put additional pressure on non-yielding Gold. The 10-year Treasury yield has recently approached 5% with inflation and oil-price concerns contributing to the rise in yields. On the other hand if the Fed delivers the expected hike but signals that further tightening will be limited Gold could see a sharp relief rally as traders sell the USD and yields. Therefore FOMC volatility can be very high in both directions and the initial spike should not automatically be treated as the final trend. Overall my bias remains bearish below 4420-4450 especially with the hawkish Fed expectations, rising yields and stronger USD creating a fundamental headwind for Gold. However because FOMC is tomorrow I would expect significant volatility around the announcement and would prefer confirmation through an H1-H4 rejection and engulfing candle rather than selling blindly into the event. Trade Plan - Sell Setup Sell Zone: 4407-4523 Sell Trigger: H1-H4 bearish rejection or bearish engulfing Targets: 4342, 4252, 4200, 4084, 3980 Extended Target: 3950-3900 Invalidation: H4 close above 4523. A sustained breakout above this level would weaken the bearish setup and could open the door toward 4600-4690. Trade Plan - Buy Setup Buy Zone: 4084-3980 Buy Trigger: H1-H4 bullish rejection or bullish engulfing Targets: 4200, 4252, 4342, 4407, 4420 Extended Target: 4450-4523 Invalidation: H4 close below 3980. A sustained break below this level would weaken the bullish recovery and could expose 3900-3800. FOMC Possible Scenario: A hawkish decision or guidance could push Gold below 4252, 4200, 4084, while a dovish surprise or less hawkish guidance could trigger a recovery toward 4407, 4450, 4497-4523. Note Please risk management in trading is a Key so use your money accordingly. If you like the idea then please like and boost. Thank you and Good Luck!

TITradingView Ideas15 Sept

DeGRAM | USDCAD is holding above rising support

📊 Technical Analysis ● USDCAD continues to trade inside a clear ascending structure, with price holding above the rising support line and maintaining a sequence of higher lows. The 1.3895–1.3910 support zone remains the key base for the current bullish setup. ● If buyers continue to defend this area, price could extend toward the 1.3950–1.3960 resistance line first. A confirmed break above that level would open the way toward the 1.3990–1.4000 target zone shown on the chart. 💡 Fundamental Analysis ● The U.S. dollar is near a two-week high as surging oil prices and higher Treasury yields strengthen expectations for a Fed rate hike on September 16, with markets pricing roughly a 93% probability. At the same time, oil near $107 supports the commodity-sensitive Canadian dollar, which could limit USDCAD upside and make the technical breakout above resistance especially important. ✨ Summary ● Bullish continuation while 1.3895–1.3910 support holds; first resistance 1.3950–1.3960, target 1.3990–1.4000. A confirmed break below rising support would weaken the bullish scenario. Share your opinion in the comments and support the idea with a like. Thanks for your support!

TITradingView Ideas15 Sept

EDUCATIONAL IDEA — MARKET STRUCTURE

EDUCATIONAL IDEA — MARKET STRUCTURE Understanding Market Structure is one of the most important skills in price-action and SMC trading. Before looking for an entry, traders should first understand how price is moving and whether the market is bullish, bearish, or changing direction. 🔹 1. HIGHER HIGH (HH) A Higher High forms when price breaks above the previous significant high. ➡️ HH shows bullish strength and confirms that buyers are pushing price higher. 🔹 2. HIGHER LOW (HL) A Higher Low forms when price pulls back but holds above the previous low. ➡️ HH + HL = Bullish Market Structure This structure suggests that buyers remain in control. 🔻 3. LOWER HIGH (LH) A Lower High forms when price makes a new high but fails to break the previous high. ➡️ LH shows weakening bullish momentum and potential bearish pressure. 🔻 4. LOWER LOW (LL) A Lower Low forms when price breaks below the previous significant low. ➡️ LH + LL = Bearish Market Structure This indicates that sellers are controlling the market. --- ⚡ BOS — BREAK OF STRUCTURE BOS occurs when price breaks a previous swing point in the direction of the existing trend. 📈 Bullish BOS → Price breaks a previous High 📉 Bearish BOS → Price breaks a previous Low BOS can be used as confirmation that the current market trend is continuing. --- 🔄 CHOCH / MSS — CHANGE OF CHARACTER CHOCH (Change of Character) or MSS (Market Structure Shift) can indicate that the market is beginning to change direction. For example: 📈 Bullish trend: HH → HL → HH → HL If price breaks below an important HL, it may signal a potential bearish shift. 📉 Bearish trend: LH → LL → LH → LL If price breaks above an important LH, it may signal a potential bullish shift. ⚠️ A structure break is not automatically a trade entry. Always consider liquidity, order blocks, FVGs, support/resistance, momentum, and risk management before entering a position. 🧠 SIMPLE MARKET STRUCTURE MAP Bullish: HH → HL → HH → HL → BOS ↑ Bearish: LH → LL → LH → LL → BOS ↓ Potential Reversal: Trend → CHOCH/MSS → Confirmation → Entry 🎯 KEY TAKEAWAY HH + HL = Bullish Structure LH + LL = Bearish Structure BOS = Trend Continuation CHOCH/MSS = Potential Trend Shift Mastering market structure helps you stop chasing random entries and start reading what price is actually doing. 📌 Save this post and use it as a reference while analyzing the market. #SMC #MarketStructure #BOS #CHOCH #MSS #PriceAction #SmartMoneyConcepts #ForexTrading #GoldTrading #TradingEducation #TechnicalAnalysis #ReubenMiles

TITradingView Ideas15 Sept

EURGBP: Bearish Drop to 0.8485?

FX:EURGBP is eyeing a bearish reversal on the 4-hour chart after forming a double top near the downward trendline, with price approaching a clear resistance zone that could act as a potential entry for further downside if sellers defend amid volatility. This setup suggests a solid pullback opportunity toward the lower support zone with 1:3.5 risk-reward .🔥 Entry between 0.8581–0.8591 (entry from current price with proper risk management is recommended). Target at 0.8485 . Set a stop loss at a daily close above 0.8608 , yielding a risk-reward ratio of 1:3.5 . Monitor for confirmation via a bearish candle close below entry with rising volume.🌟 Fundamentally , EURGBP is trading around 0.8555 in mid-September 2026. For the Euro, a key release this week (ending 18 September) is the Eurozone Final CPI (August) on Thursday, September 17, alongside ZEW Economic Sentiment data. For the British Pound, the most important event is the Bank of England Interest Rate Decision on Thursday, September 17. 💡 📝 Trade Setup 🎯 Entry (Short): 0.8581–0.8591 (Entry from current price is acceptable with proper position sizing and strict risk management.) 🎯 Target: 0.8485 ❌ Stop Loss: Daily close above 0.8608 📉 Risk-to-Reward: 1:3.5 Will sellers defend the 0.8581–0.8591 resistance zone and drive EURGBP toward 0.8485, or can buyers break the double-top structure? 👇

TITradingView Ideas15 Sept

XAUUSD Elliott Wave Analysis – September 15, 2026

## D1 Timeframe D1 momentum is currently compressed together in the oversold zone, suggesting that the bearish move may still continue. One important point is that price has created a new low but has now pulled back above the previous wave (A) low. This suggests that liquidity below wave (A) may have been swept. However, what we still need to see in order to confirm the beginning of a new bullish trend is a strong bullish daily candle close. That confirmation has not appeared yet, so we should continue to observe. The FVG below remains an area that may attract price for rebalancing. Pay close attention to both the upper and lower boundaries of this FVG. ## H4 Timeframe On H4, we can see a very clean bullish engulfing setup forming from the 4267 area. However, what I do not like is that the bullish momentum did not continue strongly afterward, which suggests that buying pressure has not yet shown enough strength. At the same time, H4 momentum is preparing to turn bearish. Therefore, H4 may develop another bearish move or continue sideways until H4 momentum moves into the oversold zone and turns upward again. The current bearish move is still developing inside a descending channel. Therefore, we will monitor whether price breaks the upper or lower boundary of this channel before making further trading decisions. ## H1 Timeframe Price is currently trapped around the 4316 area. Looking at H1, we can clearly see that the waves are overlapping each other. In this type of structure, trying to label every wave is not very practical because it can easily lead to subjective wave counting. What we really need to know is that price is currently moving within a corrective structure. The liquidity and support areas below, especially if they align with H4 momentum reaching the oversold zone, could become potential areas where the bearish move ends, or at least where a rebound develops in line with H4 momentum. Price has formed equal highs around 4316 while H1 momentum is moving lower. Therefore, this double-top structure could be part of a Flat correction within wave B or wave 2. For this reason, the 4283 area is particularly important. There is a high probability that price could develop a bullish reaction from this area. I will look for Buy opportunities around 4283 once the required confirmation appears, such as: * Both H4 and H1 momentum reaching the oversold zone. * A change in market structure appearing on the lower timeframes. If the bearish move ends around 4283, the target for the next bullish move will be the OB area above, together with the Fibonacci zone and the corresponding wave targets.

TITradingView Ideas15 Sept

USDJPY W38 — the recoveries are getting weaker

US Treasury yields have moved above 5%, yet USDJPY remains well below its July high. Earlier sharp declines were eventually recovered. The rebound after July stopped short of restoring the previous peak, and September brought another substantial decline. That combination makes USDJPY worth watching into this week’s Federal Reserve and Bank of Japan meetings. The question is whether the recent yen strength survives the announcements and begins to affect risk assets more broadly. Japanese equities already show a weaker structure, while Nasdaq provides a useful test outside Japan. For the broader stress thesis to develop, those markets need to do more than react to the same headline. They need to sustain the move after the initial volatility passes. THE CHANGE IN USDJPY https://www.tradingview.com/x/WsmZ8LPx/ The daily chart shows why the recovery matters as much as the initial decline. Several sharp selloffs earlier in the year were followed by substantial rebounds. Buyers eventually recovered the lost ground, and USDJPY went on to trade higher. The more recent sequence has been different. After the July peak, the pair fell sharply and recovered only part of the decline. The August rebound remained below that peak. September then produced another leg lower, leaving the current recovery beneath both earlier highs. This gives us an observable change: buyers have become less effective at repairing the damage after a selloff. A carry position typically combines borrowing in a lower-yielding currency with exposure to a higher-yielding asset. Its interest income accumulates gradually, while an adverse currency move can create losses quickly. A strengthening funding currency therefore becomes more consequential when it persists long enough to outweigh the income that made the position attractive. That mechanism offers one possible explanation for a weaker USDJPY recovery. The chart alone cannot establish how much carry exposure has been reduced or who is selling. It also cannot identify an intervention from the shape of a candle. Official intervention, changing policy expectations and position adjustment can all produce sharp moves. For this analysis, the useful evidence is what follows: whether buyers recover the decline, or whether the rebound fails and another lower low develops. THE RATES TEST https://www.tradingview.com/x/svufKuyg/ The US10Y snapshot shows yields above 5% and an upward trend into the event window. All else equal, higher US yields can support demand for dollar assets. USDJPY’s failure to return to its July high therefore deserves attention alongside that rates backdrop. There is an essential qualification. The US yield is only one side of the comparison. Japanese yields, expected policy paths and the maturity of the exposure all matter. The ten-year yield also contains inflation and term-premium components; it is not a direct measure of the short-term funding return available to a carry trader. A sustained USDJPY decline alongside falling US yields would be consistent with a reduction in the dollar’s rate advantage. A decline while US yields remain elevated would raise a more interesting question, but answering it would still require the Japanese side of the spread. This is why the response to the meetings matters. A policy decision can move short-term rate expectations and longer-dated bond yields differently. The useful test is whether the resulting rates environment helps USDJPY recover—and whether that recovery holds. THE JAPAN TEST https://www.tradingview.com/x/wnJju7JW/ The Nikkei chart has failed to recover its June peak. The August rally crossed the descending trendline, but it did not establish a lasting upward structure. Selling returned, and the index subsequently moved lower through a series of rebounds and renewed declines. That failed improvement is more informative than the trendline crossing itself. Buyers managed to change the appearance of the chart temporarily, but they did not regain control of the broader sequence. A stronger yen can affect Japanese equities through several channels. It can reduce the yen value of overseas earnings for some exporters, alter investment incentives and increase pressure on positions funded in yen. These effects vary across companies and portfolios, so yen appreciation does not translate mechanically into an index decline. The recent September lows provide the first practical test. If USDJPY weakens further while Japanese equities continue defending those lows, the currency move has yet to produce the equity deterioration required by this thesis. If the Nikkei breaks below them, attempts to recover the broken area and then turns lower again, the evidence becomes stronger. A subsequent move through the July low would extend that deterioration to a larger part of the chart. These are separate stages, and each needs its own confirmation. THE GLOBAL TEST https://www.tradingview.com/x/SXY6Vwx2/ Nasdaq tests whether the weakness is broadening beyond Japan. The chart here is the Pepperstone NAS100 cash CFD, so its session boundaries and gaps should be read on that basis. The recent opening gap and rebound attracted attention, but the gap itself does not establish a directional edge. The more useful observation is that the rebound has so far failed to restore the earlier September highs, leaving price back near the lower part of its recent structure. The next recovery matters. If buyers reclaim the breakdown area, establish a higher low and sustain the advance, Nasdaq would be absorbing the pressure. That would weaken the argument that the currency move is becoming a broader risk event. If rebounds continue to fail and the recent lows give way while USDJPY and the Nikkei are also weakening, the evidence for a wider adjustment increases. Even then, simultaneous declines would show participation across markets rather than prove a common funding cause. US equities can fall because of yields, earnings expectations or other developments independently of the yen. Evidence from positioning, credit and funding markets would be needed to make the stronger causal claim. WHAT WOULD CONFIRM IT The sequence begins with USDJPY sustaining its weakness beyond the initial central-bank reaction. A daily close below the September low shown in the snapshot would provide the first additional evidence. A recovery that fails to regain that broken area, followed by another lower low, would make the change more convincing. Japanese equities then need to participate. On the four-hour Nikkei chart, I would look for a close below the recent September lows and a subsequent failed recovery of that area. Nasdaq would provide the next layer if it also closes below its recent lows and fails to regain them on the rebound. These conditions distinguish a brief excursion through support from a market beginning to sustain lower prices. A single wick does not satisfy them, and a closing break remains provisional until the response becomes visible. The complete sequence would strengthen the case for a broader risk adjustment associated with persistent yen strength. It would still leave the scale and source of any forced position reduction open. WHAT WOULD INVALIDATE IT A sharp yen rally that is rapidly reversed would undermine the immediate event thesis. If USDJPY sweeps its September low, recovers it, establishes a higher low and breaks above the intervening rebound high, sellers would have failed to sustain the next leg. A sustained recovery above the August rebound high would challenge the larger sequence of weakening recoveries. That would be a more substantial structural reversal than one strong session after an announcement. The broader stress case also needs to be judged separately from the currency view. If the Nikkei recovers its recent September highs and Nasdaq repairs its breakdown while USDJPY remains soft, yen strength may persist without the equity transmission this post is testing. The W38 assessment belongs at Friday’s close, using the reference swings visible in these snapshots. If the breaks and failed recoveries have not developed by then, the weekly stress thesis remains unconfirmed. The observation window should not be extended simply to preserve the argument. THE LIMITS This is a framework for interpreting price reactions. No historical probability has been established here for this exact combination of USDJPY, yields and equity structures. The charts were captured on September 15. USDJPY is shown on the daily timeframe; the Nikkei and Nasdaq CFDs are shown on four-hour charts. Their session conventions differ, and the reference swings are those visible at the time of writing. US10Y does not establish the full US–Japan rate differential. Price action does not reveal the size of carry positions, and a stronger yen can coexist with resilient equities. The useful change so far is that USDJPY’s recoveries have become less complete. This week tests whether that behaviour persists—and whether the equity markets begin sustaining the same deterioration.

TITradingView Ideas15 Sept

BTCUSDT

We continue to trade within the VA 77,275–79,875$ value area. Locally, price is forming a declining OF within the balance, with sellers continuing to absorb buyers’ attempts to break above the range at its upper boundaries. Spot Delta does not show sufficient buying volume to shift the structure, while attempts to hold price are met with rejection and continued pressure from aggressive selling volume. Price is trading within the HVN zone of the balance and is approaching the lower boundary of the VA. On a test of VAL, a reclaim into the previously traded 78,037$ area is possible, from which a short can be considered for continuation. At the same time, the nearest FTA is the 78,500$ area: a seller reaction from this level would allow us to consider a continuation position, while accumulation and acceptance of higher prices by buyers would open a scenario targeting the 80,000$ fractal high. If price establishes below VAL, an extension toward 75k is expected, where we can assess the potential for a rotation toward the 81k area. The nearest Bid liquidity is located around 76,000$, which additionally supports the scenario of price moving outside the balance to seek liquidity, followed by an assessment of the buyers’ reaction and a potential return into the Value Area.

TITradingView Ideas15 Sept

COINEX $CET OFFICIALLY SHUTS DOWN AFTER 9 YEARS

COINEX OFFICIALLY SHUTS DOWN AFTER 9 YEARS BUT WHAT ABOUT INVESTORS WHO LOST 96% ON AMEX:CET ? COINEX AMEX:CET HOLDERS FACE A BRUTAL 96% COLLAPSE CoinEx has officially announced the shutdown of its exchange, but the biggest question is what happens to the investors who trusted its native token, $CET. AMEX:CET Technical Breakdown: ➤ Previous high marked on chart: $0.10489 ➤ Current level: Around $0.005 ➤ Decline from marked high: Nearly 96% Imagine buying AMEX:CET at $0.05–$0.10, believing in the CoinEx ecosystem, only to watch your portfolio lose most of its value. Now, CoinEx has announced a buyback at just $0.005 per CET. Who is responsible for the losses? The exchange and project leadership must answer serious questions about CET's long-term utility, value creation, and the expectations placed on token holders. Investors also face the reality that exchange tokens carry significant platform and business risks. A token's value is never guaranteed simply because an exchange is established. This is a painful reminder: Trust in a crypto platform is not the same as protection for your investment.

TITradingView Ideas15 Sept

Signs of a potential reversal?

UK100 has rejected the pivot, which has been identified as an overlap resistance that aligns with the 38.2% Fibonacci retracement and could potentially drop towards the 1st support, which is also an overlap support. Pivot: 10,700.87 1st Support: 10,590.35 1st Resistance: 10,788.32 Disclaimer: The opinions given above constitute general market commentary and do not constitute the opinion or advice of IC Markets or any form of personal or investment advice. Any opinions, news, research, analyses, prices, other information, or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an "as-is" basis, are intended to be informative only, and are not advice, a recommendation, research, a record of our trading prices, an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instrument and thus should not be treated as such. The information provided does not involve any specific investment objectives, financial situation, or needs of any specific person who may receive it. Please be aware that past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance and/or results. Past performance or forward-looking scenarios based upon the reasonable beliefs of the third-party provider are not a guarantee of future performance. Actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in forward-looking or past performance statements. IC Markets makes no representation or warranty and assumes no liability as to the accuracy or completeness of the information provided, nor any loss arising from any investment based on a recommendation, forecast, or any information supplied by any third party.

TITradingView Ideas15 Sept