TI

TradingView Ideaspage 21

Coverage, page 21

page 21 of 115

NZDCAD | 3H Analysis — Falling Wedge Formation + Bullish RSI Div

NZDCAD is currently forming a Falling Wedge on the 3H timeframe, accompanied by Bullish RSI Divergence. The divergence suggests that downside momentum is weakening, while the wedge structure indicates a potential shift in market direction. A confirmed breakout above the wedge could provide further evidence of a possible bullish reversal. Key focus: Breakout confirmation before considering any directional move. Risk management remains the priority.

TITradingView Ideas17 Sept

SOLUSDT 8H — Rangebreaker CHoCH, Watching the Retest

SOL's correction off the 110 high did more than pull back into support, it swept it. C dropped to 96, undercutting the A low at 97.38, then reclaimed back above the range within the same sequence. That's a rangebreaker CHoCH, and it printed with the larger trend, this whole ABC is corrective inside the bigger move up from the ~80 low in August, not a standalone bearish structure. Gate one, structure, still needs the descending trendline from the 110 high broken to fully confirm reversal, that line sits near 102 and hasn't been touched yet. But the character of the correction just shifted. A sweep below range lows followed by a reclaim is exhaustion behavior, not continuation behavior, sellers pushed through the obvious level and couldn't hold it. Gate two, the zone, is the reclaimed range itself, 96-98. This is now the level that needs to hold, not the level being tested for the first time. Gate three, the trigger, already printed on this timeframe, the reclaim above 97.38 after the C sweep is the CHoCH. But the entry isn't this candle. The way this pattern pays is on the retest, once the larger timeframe has shown the tell, weight goes on where a smaller timeframe comes back down to test the reclaimed range and holds it. That's the trade, not the reclaim itself. What makes the R:R on this kind of setup worth taking seriously is the stop sits tight against the range low that just got swept and reclaimed, while the room above runs back to the B high at 107 and the range top near 110. What invalidates it is a retest that fails, price closing back below 96, which would mean the sweep wasn't exhaustion, it was just the range breaking for real. The sweep already did the hard part of showing who was left to sell. The retest just confirms nobody meaningful was.

TITradingView Ideas17 Sept

Crude Oil Tests Descending Trendline After Demand Reaction

USOIL Reacts From Demand Within a Bearish Structure USOIL is trading around 102.36 after a strong decline from approximately 106.50. The market continues to respect a descending trendline, showing that the short-term structure remains under bearish pressure. Price recently reached the highlighted 101.00–101.55 demand zone and produced a noticeable reaction. However, this recovery is now approaching the descending trendline, making the current area important for determining whether buyers can extend the recovery or sellers regain control. Speculative Outlook If USOIL breaks and sustains above the descending trendline, price could attempt a recovery toward the 102.80–103.00 resistance area. Acceptance above that region would strengthen the short-term recovery scenario. On the other hand, rejection from the trendline could push price back toward the 101.00–101.55 demand zone. If this demand fails decisively, the structure could open room for further downside toward the broader lower support area near 98.50. For now, I would focus on the trendline reaction and demand-zone behavior rather than anticipating either direction too early.

TITradingView Ideas17 Sept

XAUUSD: Rejection or Recovery From Key Zones?

Gold Consolidates Between Key Supply and Demand Zones Gold is currently trading around 4,292 after a sharp bearish displacement from the 4,350–4,360 region. Price reacted strongly from the 4,230–4,245 demand zone, but the recovery has not yet changed the broader short-term weakness. The key area above is around 4,325–4,335, where the highlighted supply zone could become the next decision point. This leaves price positioned between two important zones, making confirmation at either extreme more important than the movement in the middle. Speculative Outlook My primary observation is a possible recovery toward the 4,325–4,335 supply zone. If price reaches this area and shows rejection, another bearish rotation toward 4,300 and potentially the 4,230–4,245 demand zone could develop. At the lower zone, I would watch how price behaves around 4,230–4,250. A liquidity sweep followed by a strong recovery could create the conditions for a larger bullish reversal, initially toward 4,280–4,300 and potentially back toward 4,325–4,330. So rather than assuming direction from the current midpoint, the main focus remains on reaction at supply or demand.

TITradingView Ideas17 Sept

BTCUSD Struggles to Break Above Local Resistance on 30M

Bitcoin Faces Rejection From Key Resistance After Multiple Liquidity Reactions Bitcoin has been building a series of higher reactions from the 75,300–75,600 region, showing repeated buyer activity around the lower structure. However, the recovery has now reached the highlighted 76,250–76,400 resistance zone, where price is struggling to sustain bullish continuation. The recent push above the local highs was quickly rejected, suggesting that liquidity above the short-term structure has already been tested. Despite the curved recovery structure underneath price, buyers still need a convincing break and acceptance above 76,400–76,500 to strengthen the bullish structure. Speculative Outlook I’m watching for Bitcoin to remain volatile around 76,000–76,500, potentially producing several short-term swings and liquidity sweeps before establishing direction. If price repeatedly fails to hold above the highlighted resistance, the structure could gradually weaken toward 75,800, followed by another test of 75,200–75,400. A decisive breakdown of that lower support would strengthen the bearish scenario and could expose the broader 74,800–75,000 region. Alternatively, sustained acceptance above 76,500 would weaken this bearish outlook and suggest the recovery structure is gaining strength.

TITradingView Ideas17 Sept
TI

𝗫𝗔𝗨𝗨𝗦𝗗 𝗧𝗘𝗖𝗛𝗡𝗜𝗖𝗔𝗟 𝗢𝗨𝗧𝗟𝗢𝗢𝗞 | 𝗦𝗘𝗣 𝟭𝟳

#𝗫𝗔𝗨𝗨𝗦𝗗 𝗧𝗘𝗖𝗛𝗡𝗜𝗖𝗔𝗟 𝗢𝗨𝗧𝗟𝗢𝗢𝗞 | 𝗦𝗘𝗣 𝟭𝟳 𝗗𝟭: Gold remains in a corrective phase. The broader structure is not fully bearish, but upside momentum continues to weaken. 𝗛𝟭: Price remains below the main descending trendline after a sharp rejection from 𝟰,𝟯𝟲𝟬. The current rebound is corrective, with 𝟰,𝟯𝟱𝟬–𝟰,𝟯𝟳𝟬 acting as key resistance. 𝗧𝗢𝗗𝗔𝗬’𝗦 𝗦𝗧𝗥𝗔𝗧𝗘𝗚𝗬 🔹 𝗕𝗨𝗬 𝟭: Look for a bullish reaction from 𝟰,𝟮𝟴𝟬–𝟰,𝟮𝟲𝟱. 🔹 𝗕𝗨𝗬 𝟮: If price sweeps lower, watch the stronger demand at 𝟰,𝟮𝟱𝟬–𝟰,𝟮𝟮𝟱. Targets: 𝟰,𝟯𝟬𝟬–𝟰,𝟯𝟯𝟬, then 𝟰,𝟯𝟱𝟬. 🔻 𝗦𝗘𝗟𝗟: Avoid selling at the current price. Wait for a deeper pullback into 𝟰,𝟯𝟱𝟬–𝟰,𝟯𝟳𝟬, where key resistance meets the H1 descending trendline, then look for bearish confirmation. An H1 close above 𝟰,𝟯𝟳𝟬 invalidates the sell setup. A break below 𝟰,𝟮𝟮𝟱 could extend the decline toward 𝟰,𝟮𝟬𝟬. #GoldTrading #TechnicalAnalysis #TradingSetup

TITradingView Ideas17 Sept

LVMH, after the fall, an opportunity?

LVMH’s share price has lost 55% since its all-time high in spring 2023, with the price falling from more than €900 to €400. LVMH is by far the world’s leading company in the luxury sector, so after such a sharp stock market decline, could the stock once again soon represent an opportunity? To answer this question analytically, I suggest looking at stock market valuation ratios and technical analysis signals from the financial markets. · Stock market valuation ratios: forward P/E, traditional P/E and Price-to-Sales · Medium- and long-term technical analysis signals based on the weekly Japanese candlestick chart But first, let us recall why LVMH’s share price has lost more than 50% since its 2023 record high. The main reason is the sharp reversal in the luxury cycle after several exceptional years of growth. From 2023 onwards, demand gradually normalized, with a particularly pronounced slowdown in luxury consumption in China, a strategic market for LVMH. The group also suffered from the consequences of the very significant price increases implemented in recent years, which gradually pushed part of its so-called “aspirational” customer base away. In 2024, LVMH’s revenue therefore declined by 2%, followed by another 1% decline in 2025, while recurring operating profit suffered more significantly. This was compounded by a less favorable macroeconomic environment, geopolitical and trade tensions, as well as uncertainties surrounding consumer spending in the United States and Asia. The stock market primarily penalized the decline in earnings expectations: LVMH was valued at very high multiples at its 2023 peak, based on growth that appeared capable of continuing for a prolonged period. When that growth reversed, the contraction in the valuation multiple amplified the decline in earnings. The question now is whether this sharp decline has sufficiently priced in the current difficulties to once again offer an attractive entry point. First piece of good news: from a stock valuation perspective, LVMH is once again an opportunity, especially compared with its competitors. The table below shows the global top 5 listed companies in the luxury sector, together with their forward P/E ratios. After a 55% decline from its all-time high, LVMH now trades at a significant discount to its competitors in terms of stock market valuation. https://www.tradingview.com/x/icbBvX00/ However, before returning to a buying position, the technical trend needs to stop being bearish, and the Ichimoku system can be useful in identifying this. The bearish trend will be over when the market is able to move back above the weekly Kumo of the Ichimoku system. The chart below shows LVMH’s weekly Japanese candlesticks, together with the traditional P/E, forward P/E and Price-to-Sales valuation ratios. The stock remains in a bearish trend as long as the price trades below the weekly cloud of the Ichimoku system. https://www.tradingview.com/x/okitm69r/ DISCLAIMER: This content is intended for individuals who are familiar with financial markets and instruments and is for information purposes only. The presented idea (including market commentary, market data and observations) is not a work product of any research department of Swissquote or its affiliates. This material is intended to highlight market action and does not constitute investment, legal or tax advice. If you are a retail investor or lack experience in trading complex financial products, it is advisable to seek professional advice from licensed advisor before making any financial decisions. This content is not intended to manipulate the market or encourage any specific financial behavior. Swissquote makes no representation or warranty as to the quality, completeness, accuracy, comprehensiveness or non-infringement of such content. The views expressed are those of the consultant and are provided for educational purposes only. Any information provided relating to a product or market should not be construed as recommending an investment strategy or transaction. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. Swissquote and its employees and representatives shall in no event be held liable for any damages or losses arising directly or indirectly from decisions made on the basis of this content. The use of any third-party brands or trademarks is for information only and does not imply endorsement by Swissquote, or that the trademark owner has authorised Swissquote to promote its products or services. Swissquote is the marketing brand for the activities of Swissquote Bank Ltd (Switzerland) regulated by FINMA, Swissquote Capital Markets Limited regulated by CySEC (Cyprus), Swissquote Bank Europe SA (Luxembourg) regulated by the CSSF, Swissquote Ltd (UK) regulated by the FCA, Swissquote Financial Services (Malta) Ltd regulated by the Malta Financial Services Authority, Swissquote MEA Ltd. (UAE) regulated by the Dubai Financial Services Authority, Swissquote Pte Ltd (Singapore) regulated by the Monetary Authority of Singapore, Swissquote Asia Limited (Hong Kong) licensed by the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) and Swissquote South Africa (Pty) Ltd supervised by the FSCA. Products and services of Swissquote are only intended for those permitted to receive them under local law. All investments carry a degree of risk. The risk of loss in trading or holding financial instruments can be substantial. The value of financial instruments, including but not limited to stocks, bonds, cryptocurrencies, and other assets, can fluctuate both upwards and downwards. There is a significant risk of financial loss when buying, selling, holding, staking, or investing in these instruments. SQBE makes no recommendations regarding any specific investment, transaction, or the use of any particular investment strategy. CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. The vast majority of retail client accounts suffer capital losses when trading in CFDs. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money. Digital Assets are unregulated in most countries and consumer protection rules may not apply. As highly volatile speculative investments, Digital Assets are not suitable for investors without a high-risk tolerance. Make sure you understand each Digital Asset before you trade. Cryptocurrencies are not considered legal tender in some jurisdictions and are subject to regulatory uncertainties. The use of Internet-based systems can involve high risks, including, but not limited to, fraud, cyber-attacks, network and communication failures, as well as identity theft and phishing attacks related to crypto-assets.

TITradingView Ideas17 Sept

GOLD (XAUUSD) — 15M Bullish Setup

Gold is showing a bullish recovery structure after the sharp sell-off, with price forming higher lows along an ascending trendline. Trade Idea: BUY Entry: 4292.77 Stop Loss: 4262.66 Take Profit: 4360.61 Risk/Reward: approximately 1:2.25 Why this setup? Ascending trendline: Price continues to respect the rising intraday trendline, indicating buyers are defending higher levels. Key support: The 4272.40 area is an important horizontal support. Holding above this level keeps the bullish structure intact. Higher lows: Following the aggressive drop, Gold has been recovering with progressively higher lows. Resistance/target: 4360.61 is the major upside objective and previous resistance area. Entry zone: The 4292–4294 area provides an opportunity while price remains above the rising structure. Trade Management As long as Gold remains above 4272.40 and the ascending trendline, the bullish setup remains valid. A strong 15M close below 4272.40 would weaken the setup. A break and sustained move above the recent highs would provide additional confirmation toward the 4360 region. ⚠️ Risk management: Don't risk more than you can afford to lose. Gold can move aggressively, especially around major economic news. XAUUSD | GOLD | 15M | BUY SETUP Entry: 4292.77 SL: 4262.66 TP: 4360.61 R:R: 1:2.25 #Gold #XAUUSD #Forex #GoldTrading #TechnicalAnalysis #TradingView #PriceAction #DayTrading #ForexTrading

TITradingView Ideas17 Sept

NIFTY SENTIMENt ANALYSIS FOR 17/09/2026

# NIFTY SENTIMENT ANALYSIS | 17 SEP 2026 ## STRONG BULLISH — NOW LET PRICE PROVE IT Today's two-engine reading is aligned: 🟢 **Hybrid:** Bullish | Strong Bullish 🔥 **Unified:** Strong Bullish ⚡ **Force Score:** +8 💥 **Behaviour:** Explosive 🟢 **CE Dominant** ### 🎯 KEY PRICE LEVELS **23,196.40** — Opening Reference **23,252** — First Resistance **23,308** — Major Resistance **23,364** — Higher Resistance **23,193.65** — Immediate Support At the time of analysis: **NIFTY: 23,242.30** Price is sitting between the opening reference and the first resistance. That makes **23,252** the immediate test. ➡️ Above 23,252 → watch 23,308 → 23,364 ➡️ Below 23,193.65 → reassess the bullish thesis ### ⏰ TIME ANCHOR **12:45 PM** With the model showing **EXPLOSIVE behaviour**, the period around/after this anchor becomes an important observation window for: • Expansion • Reversal • Directional resolution The anchor is a **checkpoint, not a guarantee.** ### 👀 SECTORS TO WATCH 🏦 **BANKING +7** — Primary 💊 **PHARMA +3** — Secondary 👑 **LEADERSHIP 0** — Participation to monitor The key sector question: **Can Banking confirm the bullish price structure?** If Banking participates as NIFTY clears resistance, the bullish thesis gains behavioural confirmation. If sector participation weakens, that divergence becomes information. ### 🧠 THE FRAMEWORK **Model → Hypothesis** **Price → Evidence** **Time → Checkpoint** **Reaction → Verdict** This is not about predicting every candle. It is about knowing **what to watch, where to watch it and when to pay attention.** 📍 **Price gives the level.** ⏰ **Time gives the trigger.** ⚡ **Reaction gives the truth.** **Strong Bullish is the hypothesis. Now let the market grade it.** 🎯 *Market-context and educational analysis only. Not a buy/sell recommendation.* #NIFTY #NIFTY50 #MarketSentiment #MarketAnalysis #PriceAction #MarketTiming #TradingView #NSE #IndianStockMarket #TechnicalAnalysis #IntradayTrading #TradingPsychology #Banking #Pharma

TITradingView Ideas17 Sept

XAGUSD: The Next Big Move Could Be DOWN

Silver has bounced from the support area and is attempting to push higher. However, I still don't see this move as the return of a bullish trend . On the H4 chart, XAGUSD remains below the descending trendline connecting the recent highs, while previous recovery attempts have repeatedly stalled as price approached the supply zone above. That makes the 64.45–65.30 area an important zone that could determine the next move. If price pushes deeper into this region while buying momentum begins to fade, the risk of another rejection will increase. The Ichimoku structure also adds another layer of resistance overhead, meaning buyers will need more than a short-term bounce to genuinely shift the market structure. At the moment, the macro and technical pictures are broadly aligned . Following the Fed's hawkish signal, a stronger USD and elevated Treasury yields continue to create an unfavorable environment for precious metals. This does not prevent silver from producing temporary rebounds, but it could make it difficult for buyers to sustain upside momentum once price reaches resistance. For that reason, my primary scenario remains bearish continuation : allow price to recover toward resistance, watch how it reacts, and only favor SELL opportunities if a clear rejection develops. If that scenario plays out, 62.17 is the next area I expect XAGUSD to retest.

TITradingView Ideas17 Sept

BTCUSDT 3H — Channel Break Confirmed, CVD Says Not Yet

Price broke the descending channel from the Sep 4 high and reclaimed the 75,550 shelf, with a genuine RSI bullish divergence backing it, lower low in price on Sep 16 against a higher low in RSI off the Sep 11 print. That's not a coincidence pairing, momentum was actually contracting into the second low while price kept pushing. Gate one, structure, gets a real trigger here. The channel break plus the reclaim of the shelf that held twice is a legitimate shift, not a wick through a line that means nothing. Gate two, the zone, was the 75,250-75,550 double test. Two touches, two defenses, the kind of level that earns the right to be called support rather than just getting labeled one after the fact. Gate three, the trigger, is where this stops being clean. Spot CVD has fully round-tripped back to where it sat at the 65,000 level despite price sitting over 11,000 points higher. That's an effort versus result mismatch on the macro leg, the move up was not backed by proportional net spot buying, which means either spot has been quietly distributing into this strength or whatever pushed price here wasn't conviction-driven demand. A structural trigger without order flow behind it is a signal from one gate contradicting a signal from another, and when that happens the honest move is to say so, not average it into a soft bullish take. What confirms this bounce as more than tactical is CVD turning up from here, actual net spot buying showing up rather than price grinding higher in isolation. What invalidates it is a close back below 75,550 and the divergence low, which would mean the channel resumes and this was just a relief move inside a larger downtrend. Right now this is a valid technical trigger sitting on top of an unconfirmed order flow read. Both things are true at once, and the setup doesn't get to pick which one matters more just because one of them is easier to draw an arrow on.

TITradingView Ideas17 Sept
TI

Gold – Bearish Zig-Zag Correction Setup

The chart shows a clear sequence of lower highs and lower lows after the major peak near 4,680, indicating that the short-term trend has turned bearish. The repeated zig-zag structure suggests that each recovery is being followed by another sharp decline, with the latest rebound reaching around 4,370 before facing rejection. If this structure continues, the current leg could develop into another sharp fall, with the projected move reaching around 3,950–4,000 levels. A sustained move above the recent swing high near 4,370–4,400 would weaken this bearish structure and require reassessment of the setup. The overall chart structure currently supports the possibility of another downward leg. Idea Rating: 8.5/10 Disclaimer: This is a technical-analysis idea for educational purposes only and is not financial or investment advice. The projected path and target are possible scenarios, not guaranteed outcomes. Please do your own analysis and use appropriate risk management before making any trading decision.

TITradingView Ideas17 Sept

GOLD Daily| SMC Institutional Demand Mitigation& setup Expansion

GOLD Daily | Smart Money Concepts (SMC) Institutional Demand Mitigation & setup Expansion 1. Premium Supply Distribution & Macro Highs (~5,400+) Price reached the macro higher-timeframe Premium Supply zone, leaving dramatic upper rejection wicks followed by strong bearish displacement candles. Reason: Institutional sellers absorbed lingering buyer momentum at peak liquidity, initiating macro distribution and marking the top of the overall market structure. 2. bearish-Side Liquidity (SSL) Run into Institutional Demand (~3,950 – 4,000) Extended downside expansion candles swept clean bearish-Side Liquidity (SSL) beneath key historical swing lows, driving price straight into the primary blue Institutional Demand block. Reason: Smart money engineered a liquidity raid to trigger retail opposite side, gathering high-volume discount orders required for large-scale position accumulation. 3. Impulsive Bullish Displacement & Imbalance Creation (~4,100 – 4,500) Consecutive long-bodied green expansion candles broke internal market structure to the upside (CHoCH/BOS), leaving wide Bullish Imbalance (FVG) pockets in their wake. Reason: Aggressive institutional buying shifted market character, creating price inefficiencies and establishing buyer dominance across key timeframes. 4. Supply Mitigation & Local Retracement (~4,700 down to 4,293.359) After hitting the upper Supply Mitigation block near 4,700, price printed a corrective sequence of lower-high and lower-low candles down to the Demand / Reaction Point (~4,293.359). Reason: Market participants took profit near local supply, forcing a controlled pullback into discount FVG/demand zones to re-mitigate open bullish orders. 5. Current Demand Defense & Bullish Expansion Path (Arrow Path) Recent candles show buyer absorption at current demand, projecting an upward run targeting the Internal Range High and higher supply levels. Reason: Defense of key discount demand maintains the overall bullish structure, clearing path for bullish-side liquidity runs at overhead resistance.

TITradingView Ideas17 Sept