TI

TradingView Ideaspage 82

Coverage, page 82

page 82 of 115
TI

GBPUSD – 1H Execution (4H Bias)|Bullish Trend-Continuation Setup

British Pound remains structurally bullish on the 4H, holding a clear sequence of higher highs and higher lows since June. Price is now pulling back into a confluence zone — a rising trendline intersecting a fresh higher-low formation — with RSI printing a bullish divergence at the low (higher RSI low against a similar price low), while the prior swing high carried a bearish RSI divergence that explains the pullback itself. Together this reads as a healthy correction within the broader uptrend rather than a trend change. Bias: Bullish continuation, conditional on confirmation Trigger condition: Alligator mouth opens wide (upside expansion) + break of the prior lower high Entry (Buy Stop): 1.35785 Stop Loss: 1.34538 (~125 pips, below the higher-low structure) Target: 1.38649 (~286 pips) Risk:Reward: ~1:2.3 Management: Take partial profit (50%) near the prior swing high (~1.3660), trail remainder to final target. Structure: price is testing trendline + higher-low confluence following a bearish RSI divergence at the last swing high; a confirmed break above 1.35785 with expanding Alligator lines would validate resumption of the primary uptrend toward 1.386. ⚠️ High-impact event risk this week: UK jobs (Tue), UK CPI + FOMC (Wed), BoE (Thu), UK Retail Sales (Fri) — expect elevated volatility around the trigger zone; confirm breakout holds before relying on execution.

TITradingView Ideas15 Sept

SOLUSDT - The Hunt for Liquidity Before Growth Resumes

BINANCE:SOLUSDT.P continues to consolidate, just like the rest of the market. Technically, this is a favorable sign for further upside. However, important news is ahead... https://www.tradingview.com/x/SOYTV69A/ Bitcoin is in consolidation, as is the rest of the market. Key news is ahead: the FOMC meeting and consideration of the cryptocurrency legislation. Solana is also consolidating, while at the same time maintaining its local bullish trend amid expectations of upcoming news. Technically, a liquidity pool has formed below 97.34, which could be tested before a rally higher. A long squeeze of the current range support could trigger further upside. However, a breakdown of the market structure on negative news could lead to a broader market decline Resistance levels: 103.88, 107.4 Support levels: 98.3 - 97.3 A favorable fundamental backdrop, a false breakdown of support, and price consolidation above 98.3 could become a technical catalyst for further upside toward 103.88–107.4–110 Best regards, R. Linda!

TITradingView Ideas15 Sept

When 40% Win Rate Wins Over 60%

Being right more often does not mean making more money. The account grows from expectancy, not ego. 🔵 Win Rate Can Lie A high win rate feels good because it makes the trader feel correct. Six wins out of ten looks better than four wins out of ten, so most beginners chase the number that protects the ego. https://www.tradingview.com/x/jWy9ZD4o/ But win rate by itself tells only half of the story. If your winners are small and your losers are the same size or bigger, being right more often may still not grow the account properly. This is why traders need to stop asking only, “How often do I win?” The better question is, “What happens when I win compared to what happens when I lose?” 🔵 The 3:1 Example Take ten trades with $100 risk on each one. With a 3:1 risk-reward plan, every win makes $300 and every loss loses $100. If you win only four trades and lose six, the result is still strong: four wins make $1,200, six losses lose $600, and the net result is +$600. https://www.tradingview.com/x/PZUq1rDs/ Now compare that with a 1:1 plan. You still risk $100, but every win only makes $100. Even if you win six out of ten, the math is smaller: six wins make $600, four losses lose $400, and the net result is +$200. That is the whole lesson. The trader with the lower win rate made three times more because the average win was much larger than the average loss. 🔵 Expectancy Is The Real Score Expectancy is the number that connects win rate with average win and average loss. In simple words, it asks what one trade is worth on average if you repeat the same kind of setup many times. The simple formula is: win rate multiplied by average win, minus loss rate multiplied by average loss. With the 3:1 example, the trader does not need to be right most of the time because the wins are large enough to cover the losing trades and still leave profit. This is the part many traders avoid because it is less exciting than calling a perfect entry. But it is much more useful. A trader can lose more trades than they win and still have a profitable system if the payoff is strong enough. 🔵 Being Right Can Become A Trap Most traders want a high win rate because losing feels uncomfortable. Nobody likes being wrong. The problem is that trying to be right too often can push traders into bad habits. https://www.tradingview.com/x/XYFvphpR/ They take profit too early because they want to lock in another win. They avoid wider targets because they do not want price to come back. They choose easy-looking trades with small rewards because those trades feel safer in the moment. That can create a clean-looking win rate and a weak account curve. The trader is winning often, but the wins are not doing enough work. 🔵 The Trade Must Pay Enough Not every trade needs to be 3:1. Some systems work differently, and some market conditions do not offer that much room. But every trade still needs to pay enough for the risk being taken. Before entering, the trader should know the risk, the target, and whether the reward is worth the setup. If the target is too close or the stop is too wide, the trade may need a very high win rate just to make sense. A good setup with bad payoff is not a good trade. It may win sometimes, but the math is already working against it. 🔵 Final Take A 3:1 risk-reward plan with a 40% win rate beats a 1:1 plan with a 60% win rate because the account is paid better when the trade works. Win rate protects the ego. Expectancy protects the account. Being right feels good. Being profitable is better. Swallow Academy

TITradingView Ideas15 Sept

Risk-On or Risk-Off? A Trader’s Intermarket Dashboard

Markets rarely move in isolation. A strong equity rally can look bullish on the surface, yet bonds, the dollar, commodities, volatility, or credit markets may already be warning that the underlying environment is changing. This is where intermarket analysis becomes valuable. Instead of asking only, “ Is the S&P 500 going up? ”, traders can ask a more important question: “Are other markets confirming the move?” A simple intermarket dashboard can help answer that question and provide a repeatable way to identify whether the broader environment is risk-on, risk-off, or transitioning between the two. The Seven-Market Dashboard A practical dashboard can be built around seven major components: • Equities • Government bonds and yields • U.S. Dollar • Gold • Commodities • Volatility • Credit Each market provides a different piece of information. The objective isn't to predict every move, but to determine whether the markets are broadly aligned. 1. Equities: The Risk Appetite Signal Equities are usually the first market traders watch. A rising stock market generally suggests improving risk appetite, but price alone isn't enough. A healthier risk-on environment often includes: Stocks ↑ + credit improving + volatility ↓ If equities are rising while volatility remains elevated and credit markets deteriorate, the rally deserves more caution. The key is confirmation. A stock index making new highs is more convincing when other risk-sensitive markets are behaving constructively at the same time 2. Bonds: Watch the Yield, Not Just the Price Government bonds provide information about growth expectations, inflation, and monetary policy. For equity traders, Treasury yields can be particularly important. Falling yields may support growth stocks when they reflect easing financial conditions. But falling yields caused by aggressive growth concerns can tell a completely different story. Likewise, rising yields can indicate stronger economic expectations or tighter financial conditions. Therefore, the question isn't simply: “Are yields rising or falling?” It is: “Why are yields moving?” That distinction can prevent traders from interpreting the same price movement in the wrong context. 3. The Dollar: The Global Financial Conditions Gauge The U.S. Dollar Index is one of the most useful components of an intermarket dashboard. A stronger dollar can tighten financial conditions, particularly for economies and assets exposed to dollar-denominated funding. A weaker dollar can, in certain environments, support commodities and risk assets. But again, context matters. A rising dollar alongside falling equities, weaker commodities, and widening credit spreads can represent a classic defensive environment. A falling dollar alongside stronger equities and commodities is generally more consistent with risk appetite. The dollar therefore acts as an important cross-market confirmation tool. 4. Gold: More Than a Safe Haven Asset Gold is often described simply as a safe haven, but its intermarket relationships are more nuanced. Gold responds to factors including: • Real yields • Dollar strength • Inflation expectations • Monetary policy • Investor demand for defensive assets One particularly useful relationship is between gold and real yields. If gold rises while real yields fall, the move has a different macro interpretation than gold rising alongside sharply higher real yields. Gold can therefore help traders distinguish between inflationary pressure, monetary expectations, and genuine defensive positioning. 5. Commodities: The Economic Pulse Commodities provide another important piece of the puzzle. Industrial commodities can offer clues about economic demand, while energy prices can influence inflation expectations and consumer purchasing power. When equities, industrial commodities, and cyclical assets rise together, the market may be pricing stronger economic activity. But if equities continue higher while economically sensitive commodities weaken significantly, the divergence deserves attention. It doesn't automatically mean a market top is coming. It means the trend deserves closer examination. 6. Volatility: The Market’s Stress Gauge Volatility is one of the fastest ways to identify changes in risk appetite. A falling volatility index alongside rising equities generally supports a risk-on interpretation. The opposite combination, falling equities and sharply rising volatility, is a much clearer risk-off signal. But perhaps the most interesting situation occurs when the two diverge. If equities continue climbing while volatility stops falling or begins rising, traders should become more selective. Volatility isn't necessarily a timing indicator by itself. Instead, it can act as an early warning system that market confidence is becoming less stable. 7. Credit: The Confirmation Layer Credit markets can sometimes provide information that equities haven't fully priced in yet. When credit spreads remain contained while equities rise, the broader risk environment is generally healthier. When credit spreads begin widening substantially, however, the message becomes more defensive. This is why credit can be considered the confirmation layer of the dashboard. Stocks can remain optimistic for longer than fundamentals justify. Credit markets can sometimes reveal that investors are becoming more cautious underneath the surface. Turning Seven Markets Into One Signal The dashboard becomes more useful when traders stop analyzing each market independently. A simple scoring model can make the process repeatable. https://www.tradingview.com/x/Fe2rbJlP/ The exact signals shouldn't be treated as rigid rules. Their meaning depends on the macro regime. The objective is to count confluence. If five or six components are sending a similar message, the probability of a meaningful regime is stronger than when only one market is moving. The Three Regimes This creates three broad environments. Risk-On Typical characteristics include: Equities ↑ Credit improving Volatility ↓ Commodities ↑ USD stable to weaker This environment generally favors cyclical and higher-beta assets, although individual setups still require technical confirmation. Risk-Off A defensive regime may look like: Equities ↓ Credit deteriorating Volatility ↑ USD ↑ Commodities ↓ This doesn't necessarily mean every asset will fall. Some defensive assets can outperform as capital rotates toward perceived safety. Transition: The most interesting regime is often neither risk-on nor risk-off. It is the transition. For example, equities may still be trending upward while credit begins weakening, volatility rises, and the dollar starts strengthening. No single signal proves that the trend is ending. But the number of conflicting signals is increasing. That's precisely when traders should move from aggressive positioning to selective positioning. The Most Powerful Signal Is Divergence Intermarket analysis becomes particularly valuable when markets disagree. Imagine the following scenario: The S&P 500 reaches a new high, but credit spreads begin widening, volatility rises, commodities weaken, and the dollar strengthens. The correct conclusion isn't automatically: “Sell everything.” Instead: “The equity trend is losing intermarket confirmation.” That distinction is important. Intermarket analysis is not designed to predict the exact day of a reversal. It is designed to identify when the probability of the existing regime continuing may be changing. A Repeatable Weekly Process Traders don't need to monitor seven markets all day. A simple weekly process can be enough. Step 1 : Determine the primary equity trend. Step 2 : Check Treasury yields and identify the macro driver behind the move. Step 3 : Evaluate the dollar's direction. Step 4 : Compare gold and commodities with the broader risk environment. Step 5 : Check volatility for confirmation or stress. Step 6 : Examine credit for hidden deterioration. Step 7 : Classify the environment as risk-on, risk-off, or transition. Step 8 : Only then evaluate individual trade setups. This approach changes the question from: “Should I buy this chart?” to: “Does this trade make sense within the current market regime?” That is a much stronger question. My Thought: The biggest advantage of intermarket analysis isn't that it produces perfect forecasts. It doesn't. Its value is that it provides context. A trader looking at a single chart sees price. A trader looking across equities, bonds, currencies, commodities, volatility, and credit sees the relationships behind that price. Markets constantly communicate with one another. The goal isn't to listen to every signal. It is to recognize when several markets start telling the same story and when they suddenly stop. Price gives you the setup. Intermarket analysis tells you whether the environment is supporting it. By @BrightRally_Research on @TradingView

TITradingView Ideas15 Sept

S&P500 targeting the 1W MA100 by Midterm Elections.

Last week (September 08, see chart below), we gave a strong Sell Signal on the S&P500 index (SPX), as it had started the new Bearish Leg of its 1-month Channel Down: https://www.tradingview.com/chart/US500/hZgRhjUp-S-P500-Channel-Down-targeting-the-1D-MA50/ Both our Target and the 1D MA50 got hit and now the market faces the next medium-term Support, the 1D MA100 (green trend-line), which held the July 31 bottom and has been basically holding since the April 10 break-out. If broken, expect the S&P500 to seek its 1W MA100 (red trend-line), which sits exactly within the 0.618 - 0.786 Fibonacci range of the 4-year Channel Up. The Sine Waves show that since May 2022, every roughly 385 days, the market drops and tests its 1W MA100. Based on that, we expect the market to hit 6800 going towards the Midterm Elections. --- ** Please LIKE 👍, FOLLOW ✅, SHARE 🙌 and COMMENT ✍ if you enjoy this idea! Also share your ideas and charts in the comments section below! This is best way to keep it relevant, support us, keep the content here free and allow the idea to reach as many people as possible. ** --- 💸💸💸💸💸💸 👇 👇 👇 👇 👇 👇

TITradingView Ideas15 Sept
TI

the value of gold as an asset allocation needs to be reassessed.

As global fiscal risks converge, the value of gold as an asset allocation needs to be reassessed. Although gold has staged a strong rally this year, allocations by U.S. institutions remain notably low. Total holdings in gold ETFs are poised to hit record highs, reflecting the undeniable rise in risk within the global fiscal landscape. "This is precisely why gold serves as a market pressure relief valve; there is simply no alternative," he noted. Overall, while Federal Reserve monetary policy remains a direct driver of short-term gold price volatility, this represents merely transitory noise. When looking at the deteriorating global fiscal outlook, short-term interest rate adjustments fail to address the root causes of the sovereign debt crisis; policy actions may slightly accelerate or delay the materialization of risk, but the ultimate outcome remains unchanged. Gold fundamentally reflects the long-term erosion of the pricing currency's purchasing power, and mounting fiscal pressures will continue to reinforce its value as an investment asset. Beyond short-term market fluctuations, the long-term trajectory of sovereign debt serves as the true "North Star" for gold investment.

TITradingView Ideas15 Sept

BNB: Deeper Pullback — But the Medium-Term Uptrend Still Stands

Pullback Runs Deeper BNB remains within its medium-term uptrend, but this latest pullback has run noticeably deeper than the previous one. Price has developed a short-term sequence of lower highs and lower lows since the $780.64 high. Key Confluence Being Tested Price is now consolidating around the 0.618 Fib at $715.11, almost directly alongside the bullishly crossed 100/50-period EMAs. This makes the current area an important test for buyers. Volume Eases at the Lows Volume has decreased as BNB consolidates near the bottom of the pullback. For now, there is little evidence of sellers aggressively pressing price lower. Momentum Remains Soft RSI remains below 50, reflecting the recent weakness, while StochRSI has recovered into mid-range territory. Neither currently provides a particularly strong directional signal. First Sign of a Bullish Turn A break above the recent $741.61 swing high would give the short-term chart a bullish change of character. That would be the first meaningful indication that the pullback may be ending. In Summary BNB’s medium-term uptrend remains intact, but the deeper nature of this latest pullback deserves some caution. Price is consolidating around the $715.11 0.618 Fib and bullishly crossed 100/50-period EMAs, while declining volume suggests selling pressure is currently limited. A break above $741.61 would improve the short-term structure, but ultimately a daily close above $780.64 is needed to resume the wider medium-term uptrend.

TITradingView Ideas15 Sept

BTC Pink Wave Y | 76.15K Key Level

# Bitcoin Market Analysis (BTCUSDT) # Current Scenario Finally, BTC has given the signal confirming: 🔴 **Pink Wave X → Completed** Now, the key level I am monitoring is: **76.15K** A break below this level followed by a sustained move below it would provide stronger confirmation for the continuation of Pink Wave Y. Until that happens, I will continue monitoring the structure step by step. --- 👍 If you find this analysis useful, don't forget to follow **MAS Crypto Analysis** for future Bitcoin updates. *This publication is intended for educational and market analysis purposes only and does not constitute financial advice.* #Bitcoin #BTCUSDT #BTCUSD #Crypto #PriceAction #ElliottWave #WaveAnalysis #SupplyAndDemand #TrendAnalysis

TITradingView Ideas15 Sept

Adidas — Bearish Selling Setup | Downside Potential

Adidas is currently developing a bearish structure, with price action showing increasing signs of weakness and selling pressure. The present setup is positioned toward the sell side, with the focus on a potential continuation into lower price territory. 📉🔥 The current market behaviour suggests that buyers are struggling to maintain sustained upside momentum, while sellers are becoming increasingly influential. This imbalance creates a favourable environment for a bearish scenario if the existing structure continues to deteriorate. The analysis is based on the broader price formation, momentum and signals generated through my trading methodology rather than reacting to a single candle or isolated market movement. From a technical perspective, the key consideration is whether the current weakness can develop into a sustained downward phase. If sellers maintain control and bearish momentum expands, adidas could continue progressing toward lower levels. 📊 Setup Overview - Instrument: adidas - Bias: Bearish 📉 - Direction: Sell - Focus: Downside continuation - Structure: Weakening - Momentum: Selling pressure increasing - Approach: Technical market-structure analysis Short-term rebounds remain possible within any declining market, but the primary scenario remains focused on the downside while the prevailing conditions continue to support sellers. The objective is to remain aligned with the broader structure, follow the established methodology and allow price action to determine the development of the move. 🔥 Bearish Outlook The current formation indicates that upside attempts are losing effectiveness, while the selling side is gaining greater influence over price behaviour. If this imbalance persists, adidas could enter a deeper corrective phase and explore progressively lower territory. The setup therefore offers a clear bearish framework built around structure, momentum and directional pressure. Weakness developing. Sellers gaining control. Downside remains the focus. 🎯📉

TITradingView Ideas15 Sept

XAUUSD IDEA

Gold (XAUUSD) continues to maintain a bearish market structure, with price currently testing the local lows as the market awaits key Federal Reserve developments and monitors renewed strength in the U.S. Dollar Index (DXY). The primary focus remains on the Federal Reserve interest-rate decision, the updated Summary of Economic Projections (SEP/dot plot), and Fed communication, including Christopher Warsh’s rhetoric. These events could significantly influence USD yields and trigger heightened volatility across gold markets. Although the broader technical structure remains bearish, the downside is not without risk. A dovish Fed surprise, weaker-than-expected guidance, or a decline in the U.S. dollar could trigger a sharp short-covering rally and temporarily reverse the bearish momentum. Key Fundamental Drivers Bearish Factors Hawkish Federal Reserve expectations Stronger U.S. Dollar Index Rising Treasury yields Higher-for-longer rate expectations Further escalation of geopolitical tensions Bullish Factors Dovish Fed rhetoric or guidance A less hawkish-than-expected rate decision Falling U.S. yields Dollar weakness Geopolitical de-escalation Key Technical Levels Resistance 4,287 4,345 Support 4,230 4,200 📊Technical 👀📌🔽☄️⁉️ From a technical perspective, sustained consolidation below the 4,287–4,300 resistance zone would keep the bearish structure intact and could act as a catalyst for another move toward 4,230, followed by 4,200 if downside momentum accelerates. However, traders should remain cautious ahead of the Fed decision. A confirmed hawkish Fed stance, particularly if accompanied by a stronger-than-expected rate path or higher projected rates, could place significant additional pressure on gold. Conversely, a dovish surprise could invalidate the immediate bearish setup and trigger a recovery toward the 4,287–4,345 resistance area. Trading Bias Primary bias: Bearish below 4,287–4,300 Below 4,287: bearish continuation remains favored. Break below 4,230: opens the way toward 4,200. Reclaim above 4,300: bearish momentum weakens. Break above 4,345: would provide stronger evidence of a bullish reversal. Key takeaway: The technical structure favors selling rallies while price remains below 4,287–4,300, but entering aggressively immediately before the Fed decision carries elevated event risk. Waiting for the initial volatility and looking for confirmation may offer a higher-probability setup.🚨🫡 MARKET BIAS: BEARISH Gold continues to trade within a bearish structure, with price struggling below the 4,287–4,300 resistance zone. The market is approaching key support while traders await major Fed-related news. 🔻 SELL SCENARIO👀 Sell Zone: 4,270 – 4,287 Stop Loss: 4,315💢 TP1: 4,250 TP2: 4,230 TP3: 4,200

TITradingView Ideas15 Sept

Bitcoin 15-09-2026

Bitcoin Charting📊 15-09-26 These area for day trading or for swing trades rest trading tips we will share shortly📉📈. We have mentioned the key liquidity areas also Key reversal areas. Trade as per your confirmation. Risk Disclaimer🚨 All the information we are providing in the form of charts and signal is for educational purposes only📚. Trading involved high risk and may result in financial losses📉. Members are responsible for their trading decisions🛑as we are not your financial advisor.

TITradingView Ideas15 Sept

Gold 30Min Engaged ( Bearish Reversal Detected )

HANZO MARKET LIQUIDITY REPORT Gold Timeframe: 30min (Volume Basis) Scale: Higher Timeframe Context / Deep Volume analysis ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ Market Observation This analysis is focusing on structural behavior, liquidity zones, Volume analysis and key areas of interest within the current range. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ Market Bias Full liquidity Map ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🔥Bearish Reversal Key Volume Zone : 4293 Area ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ Structure Factors: • Higher timeframe Volume reaction level • High-volume / Hidden • Range Defend structure • Volume Stacking • Quarter Volume

TITradingView Ideas15 Sept

Gold 15-09-2026

Gold Charting📊 15-09-26 These area for day trading or for swing trades rest trading tips we will share shortly📉📈. We have mentioned the key liquidity areas also Key reversal areas. Trade as per your confirmation. Risk Disclaimer🚨 All the information we are providing in the form of charts and signal is for educational purposes only📚. Trading involved high risk and may result in financial losses📉. Members are responsible for their trading decisions🛑as we are not your financial advisor.

TITradingView Ideas15 Sept

Bitcoin's failed breakout

Yesterday, bitcoin was rallying and for a time it looked like it was going to finally break out of the recent consolidation range to the upside, giving us a continuation bullish signal. However, the breakout attempt from the triangle failed to generate much upside and as such the price of BTC started to ease lower late in the day. The failed breakout then triggered fresh selling overnight and now Bitcoin is back to the same support area near 76,500 to 77,000 where it has been trying to establish a base for several weeks now. What now? Well, the failed breakout attempt suggests we could now see a run on the stops resting below the abovementioned support zone, which could potentially lead to a bit of correction. Next support comes in around 75K, with longer-term levels of 73.8K, 70.0K and 69.0K being the next downside targets to watch. However, if the 76.5K-77.K support holds once again, and we see a big bounce here, leading to a break above the trend line of the triangle pattern, then at that point all bearish bets would be off again. From a macro perspective, we have seen a bit of risk off trade in the last few days as yields and oil both continue to press higher, putting pressure on zero-yielding assets. Markets are also awaiting the Fed decision on Wednesday. Could be a volatile next few days, but hopefully some clarity after that. By Fawad Razaqzada, FOREX.com analyst

TITradingView Ideas15 Sept

Rocketlab - The Stock Came Back to Earth, Ready to Re-Launch

NASDAQ:RKLB Rocket Lab - Rising Wedge Breakdown, 61.8% Retracement, Falling Wedge Building. One Level Decides The Entry. Rocket Lab deserves every bit of attention it is getting. Q1 2026 revenue came in at $200.3 million, up 63% year-over-year, with adjusted EBITDA losses narrowing dramatically and a backlog that keeps expanding. The Neutron rocket remains on track for its first launch in late 2026, which would transform the company from a small-payload specialist into a genuine competitor for medium-lift missions. Morgan Stanley, Bank of America, and TD Cowen have all raised price targets this year, with a consensus analyst target of $111 implying approximately 78% upside from current levels. The Iridium acquisition announced in June adds recurring satellite revenue to what was already a structurally compelling growth story. This is not hype, the fundamentals are catching up to the narrative. The Setup After an enormous rally from 2024 that unfolded within a rising wedge, the pattern played out exactly as the textbook suggests, price broke down and retraced 61.8% of the full wedge height, one of the most significant Fibonacci levels in technical analysis. That correction carved out a falling wedge, which, in contrast to the rising wedge that preceded it, typically resolves to the upside. We believe the current bounce could be the final one within the falling wedge, given the confluence with the 61.8% Fibonacci retracement and the white horizontal support/resistance level that has been respected multiple times historically. If macro pressure forces one more leg lower, the low $50s represents the likely final bounce zone, a confluence of that same white support and the 200-day EMA on the 3-day timeframe. https://www.tradingview.com/x/hnHzDo6S/ Our Entry Signal We will not initiate a position before confirmation. A weekly close above the falling wedge resistance is our trigger, not before. Levels to Watch Entry trigger - weekly close above falling wedge resistance Key support - white horizontal level, respected multiple times Macro support - low $50s confluence with 200-day EMA on 3D timeframe Keep posted for updates.

TITradingView Ideas15 Sept

DeGRAM | XAUUSD is extending the correction

📊 Technical Analysis ● XAU/USD remains below the major descending resistance line and has now broken beneath the previous key support around 4,300. The sequence of lower highs and lower lows keeps the broader 3H structure bearish. ● Price is moving inside the local bearish channel, with the 4,320–4,350 resistance zone becoming the main area for a possible corrective rebound. If sellers defend this zone, the next downside objective remains the 4,180–4,200 target zone shown on the chart. 💡 Fundamental Analysis ● Gold remains under pressure as the Fed begins its September 15–16 meeting. Markets are heavily pricing a 25 bp rate hike, while U.S. Treasury yields have climbed above 5% and the dollar remains firm. At the same time, oil above $108 is reinforcing inflation concerns, which is keeping rate expectations elevated despite ongoing Middle East tensions. ✨ Summary ● Bearish continuation remains the main scenario while XAU/USD stays below 4,320–4,350; target 4,180–4,200. A sustained recovery above resistance would weaken the bearish setup. Share your opinion in the comments and support the idea with a like. Thanks for your support!

TITradingView Ideas15 Sept