Nasdaqpage 2

Organization · 311 articles
Share

Coverage, page 2

page 2 of 16

USNAS100 | Bulls Target 29465 as Yields & Oil Retreat

USNAS100 is showing bullish momentum today, supported not only by the technical structure but also by an improvement in the short-term fundamental backdrop. Following yesterday’s Fed rate hike, Nasdaq futures are rebounding strongly as long-term Treasury yields ease and oil prices continue to retreat. Nasdaq 100 futures were up roughly 1% in early U.S. trading, outperforming the other major indices. Lower long-term yields are particularly supportive for technology and growth stocks because they reduce some of the valuation pressure created by higher borrowing costs. Technically The price is currently consolidating inside the 29280–29465 range, while momentum remains bullish as long as the market holds above the 29280 pivot. The first upside target remains 29465. A confirmed 1H candle close above 29465 would strengthen the bullish structure and support an extension toward 29680. On the downside, the bullish setup would begin to weaken if the market loses 29280. A confirmed 4H candle close below 29280 would shift momentum bearish and open the way toward 29040, followed by 28850 if selling pressure continues. Fundamental Structure The immediate environment is currently supportive for Nasdaq: oil is falling, the 10-year Treasury yield is easing, and technology shares are leading today’s recovery. However, the broader macro risk has not disappeared. The Fed raised rates by 25 bps yesterday to 3.75%–4.00%, and policymakers indicated that further tightening could be necessary. Markets are currently pricing roughly a 51% probability of another hike in October, up from around 44% before the decision. Pivot Line: 29280 Resistance: 29465 – 29680 Support: 29040 – 28850

TITradingView Ideas17 Sept

Nasdaq range survives another test of support

Right now it looks like a waiting game for Nasdaq traders. The index has put in a string of lower highs since the record high was set in June, but since around the middle of August, price action has been largely rangebound between 29,670 on the topside and 28,875 below. More recently, the price has spent more time towards the lower end of that range. There have been multiple tests of 28,875, along with a couple of false breaks below it, but none have stuck. One option is to keep playing the range. If another break below 28,875 fails and the price reverses back above the level, longs could be considered with a tight stop beneath for protection, initially targeting the minor downtrend running from the mid-August high, then 29,670. The 50-day moving average sits in between and has capped the price over recent days, including in early European trade on Thursday. At the other end, if the price moves back towards 29,670 and again fails to break higher, shorts could be established with a tight stop above for protection, targeting a retracement towards 28,875. The other option is to wait for a breakout. A break and close beneath 28,875 would provide the option to establish shorts with a tight stop above the level for protection, initially targeting 28,000, where the price did some work in late July. Beyond that, the 200-day moving average around 27,287 would come into play. If the upper end of the range were to break with a close above 29,670, longs could be considered with a tight stop beneath for protection, initially targeting downtrend resistance running from the June record high. Above that, 30,245, the swing high set on August 17, would be the next level, followed by the record high at 30,756. The oscillators had been pointing to building downside pressure, but that has since reversed on the daily timeframe. For now, it looks more like a case of letting the price action dictate the trade rather than forcing a bullish or bearish bias. Good luck! DS

TITradingView Ideas17 Sept

ETH: Why This Range Trade Still Favors the Bulls

While the S&P, Nasdaq, and Dow sold off following this week's FOMC rate decision, Ethereum held firm. That divergence is a signal. In this breakdown we walk through our two foundational tools, Previous Period High/Low/Mid/Close and PriceMap, to build and stress test a market thesis in real time. Price is holding above its monthly directional, the classic pivot that defines trend bias. With the R level sitting beneath the market, sentiment reads bullish. As long as the R level acts as a support floor rather than flipping to a resistance ceiling, the uptrend structure stays intact. The near term trigger is the previous week's low. Holding above it, even as broader risk assets sell off, signals underlying strength and keeps the bull case alive. Losing it doesn't kill the thesis, it just shifts the read toward the deeper monthly R level as the next area to reassess risk. Bottom line: this isn't about calling a breakout. It's about knowing exactly where the thesis breaks, and trading with that clarity instead of the noise.

TITradingView Ideas16 Sept

NASDAQ: 4H Death Cross is a strong Sell Signal.

Nasdaq turned neutral on its 1D technical outlook (RSI = 50.750, MACD = 45.940, ADX = 12.107) as 1 month Channel Down took a break this week, consolidating ahead of the Fed. The emergence however of a 4H Death Cross yesterday calls for a continuation of the main downtrend. Last time it was recently formed (July 1st), the market dropped by -5.44% during a pattern that gave 3 such declines of similar magnitude. Given that August's bearish wave was -4.56%, expect a new LL on a similar drop (TP = 28,400). ## If you like our free content follow our profile to get more daily ideas. ## ## Comments and likes are greatly appreciated. ##

TITradingView Ideas16 Sept

NVDA to revisit the $185 lows?

After another ATH and an insane rally, NASDAQ:NVDA has entered a descending channel. This is the trickiest phase, when everyone is trying to figure out what comes next: a breakdown and trend reversal, or another leg up? 1️⃣ The first thing that worries me is CMF. It’s moving in harmony with price, indicating a steady outflow of capital from the stock. This is usually a sign that the current trend may continue. 2️⃣ There’s also less liquidity above than below. The nearest major liquidity zone is currently around $193–$188. 3️⃣ On top of that, there’s an FVG directly below the current price at $207–$198. And as we know, FVGs tend to get filled sooner or later. 4️⃣ Even though everything currently points toward further downside and new local lows, there are two small gaps above at $218–$213 and $224–$221. Price could try to fill them and squeeze shorts before moving lower. But right now, I see the best trade on NASDAQ:NVDA as a long from the lower boundary of the descending channel. According to my AI tests, channels that have held for more than three weeks on NVDA have shown 83% accuracy. So based on those results, I see no mathematical reason to ignore this pattern. The problem is that everyone can see it too. That’s why we could get a move up to fill the gaps first. ⚠️ So if you’re looking to short, don’t rush. Wait for at least the first gap to fill, or use a wider stop above those zones.

TITradingView Ideas16 Sept

Research 16.09.2026

🌏 Markets: AMEX:SPY +2.58 +0.34%(pre/m) NASDAQ:QQQ +4.45 +0.63%(pre/m) 🆕 Economic News: 08:30 USA – Export/Import Prices 08:30 USA – Retail Sales 10:00 USA – Business Inventories 10:00 USA – NAHB Housing Market Index 10:30 USA – EIA Crude Oil/Gasoline Stocks Change 14:00 USA – Fed Interest Rate Decision 14:30 USA – Fed Press Conference 📈 Gap Ups Reaction to earnings/guidance: NASDAQ:TCOM Other news: Barclays upgraded NASDAQ:ALVO from Underweight to Overweight and raised its price target from $4.00 to $8.00. Barclays highlighted the FDA’s decision to close its May 2026 inspection of Alvotech’s Reykjavik manufacturing facility with a Voluntary Action Indicated (VAI) classification. Eight operators are advancing AI-RAN proofs of concept and live trials with NYSE:NOK on NVIDIA platforms. NYSE:BE Gains Another ‘Meaningful’ Proof Point With Project Phoenix, Says RBC — 2 GW Build Reinforces Data Center Opportunity NASDAQ:SKHY and NASDAQ:INTC are discussing a potential agreement to manufacture memory chips in the United States. 📉 Gap Downs Reaction to earnings/guidance: Other news: NASDAQ:JBHT warned of a decline in earnings and highlighted rising operating costs. CRYPTOCAP:BTC , NASDAQ:COIN , NYSE:CRCL Under Pressure After CLARITY Act Vote Stalls. NYSE:STLA to invest over €1bn in French van plant upgrade – report ‼️ Additional Von der Leyen: The EU’s trade deficit with China has reached €1 billion per day. The EU depends on China for more than 80% of many critical raw materials and for 90% of certain rare earth elements. -- EU countries’ military spending has increased by nearly 80% over the past five years. -- We want to make Canada the EU’s first associate member. Musk’s X has partnered with Interactive Brokers, Moomoo, Gemini, Kraken, and Coinbase to launch trading, including cryptocurrencies, directly through the platform. The social network X is part of the SpaceX corporate structure. NASDAQ:SPCX Foreign investors are currently buying more US equities than US Treasuries, something that has occurred only three times over the past century. Deutsche says this reflects exceptionally weak demand for US government bonds. 🏢 IPO NYSE:ASBH – American Savings Bank of Hawaii Company is the third-largest bank in Hawaii by deposits, serving nearly 400,000 customers through 35 branches and 120+ ATMs across five islands. Its loan portfolio is heavily concentrated in Hawaiian real estate. Core thesis is a well-capitalized local banking franchise with a century-long operating history and strong market presence in Hawaii. Price: $16.00 Shares: 8.1M Raised: $128.9M Market Cap: ~$1.0B LTM: Revenue: $195.2M Net Income: -$30.2M Key point: The bank swung back to net profit in H1 2026 and reported a CET1 ratio of 13.5% and Tier 1 leverage ratio of 9.1%. Comparable public companies: NYSE:BOH , NASDAQ:FHB , NYSE:WAL , NASDAQ:COLB , NASDAQ:CVBF , NYSE:BANC 📋 List of tickers involved: NASDAQ:TCOM NASDAQ:ALVO NYSE:NOK NYSE:BE NASDAQ:SKHY NASDAQ:INTC NASDAQ:JBHT CRYPTOCAP:BTC NASDAQ:COIN NYSE:CRCL NYSE:STLA NASDAQ:SPCX NYSE:ASBH NYSE:BOH NASDAQ:FHB NYSE:WAL NASDAQ:COLB NASDAQ:CVBF NYSE:BANC Best regards – hi2morrow team.

TITradingView Ideas16 Sept

Can Starlink's Profits Outrun a $75 Billion Cash Burn?

SpaceX trades near $143.49 per share after its public debut, valuing the company at roughly $1.94 trillion. The macro backdrop works against that multiple. The ten-year Treasury yield has approached 5.0%, lifting discount rates across growth equities, while crude above $100 per barrel raises aerospace supply chain costs. Near-term flows cut the other way: the September 18 Nasdaq-100 rebalance lifts SpaceX's weighting from 1.28% to 2.82%, forcing up to $22 billion of passive buying. That demand meets heavy supply. Lockup releases have already added over 1.2 billion shares, and another 2.3 billion will become tradable before year-end. Second-quarter revenue reached $7.81 billion, up 91.9% year-over-year, against $18.7 billion for all of 2025. Management guides toward $100 billion in annual recurring revenue by December. Connectivity carries the business, with Starlink producing $4.3 billion in quarterly revenue and $2.6 billion in adjusted EBIT from 12 million subscribers at $66 ARPU. AI compute leasing added $2.6 billion in revenue and $1.1 billion in operating profit, helped by one undisclosed client paying $1.11 billion monthly. The launch segment still loses money, posting a $200 million adjusted EBIT loss as Starship development absorbs connectivity profits. Quarterly capital expenditures hit $18.4 billion, an annualized pace near $75 billion. David Einhorn has publicly questioned how investment-grade ratings square with persistent negative free cash flow. Government demand supplies the strategic ballast. A White House directive on commercial space transportation accelerates launch approvals, and Italy is negotiating a $1.6 billion Starlink security contract despite domestic opposition and Brussels' preference for the €10 billion IRIS² constellation, which will not fly before 2030. Starshield extends the franchise into defense, with satcom terminals planned across the F-35 fleet by 2031. The Pentagon's IL5 accreditation for Grok for Government opened a recurring software revenue line reaching 1.7 million defense personnel. Data center capacity of 1.4 gigawatts is scaling toward 2.0 gigawatts this year, at roughly $50 billion per gigawatt to build. Starship Flight 14 launches September 22 as the program's first orbital and first revenue-generating mission, deploying 26 Starlink V3 satellites. That single flight adds 26 terabits per second of bandwidth against 2.6 from a Falcon 9, with production missions targeting 60. The patent data reveals where management believes the moat sits: 73.5% of published families cover RF and user terminals, while rockets and propulsion account for just 3%. Engines and metallurgy stay locked as trade secrets rather than public blueprints. The investment question reduces to timing. If Starship reaches full reusability, SpaceX controls orbital bandwidth economics outright. Until operating cash flow covers the capital budget, the shares stay volatile.

TITradingView Ideas16 Sept
  • critical toward Starlink · 76%

NASDAQ - Technical Analysis

The price of NASDAQ is currently expected to undergo a bullish correction toward the 29290 pivot level before resuming its downward trend. As long as the price trades below this pivot point, the trend remains bearish toward the support targets at 28950 and subsequently 28770. However, if the price manages to break above the 29290 pivot level and confirms a 1-hour candle close above it, a bullish trend will be initiated toward the resistance levels at 29450 and 29600. Resistance Levels: 29450 – 29600 Support Levels: 28950 – 28770

TITradingView Ideas16 Sept

Amazon ($AMZN) Daily: Corrective Pullback Approaches

Amazon ( NASDAQ:AMZN ) Daily: Corrective Pullback Approaches Crucial 200-EMA & 226 Support Confluence for Bullish Reversal ### 🇺🇸 Amazon.com, Inc. ( NASDAQ:AMZN ) Daily Technical Matrix (Ref: AMZN_2026-09-16_09-30-33.png) We are issuing an updated Daily (1D) structural study for Amazon.com, Inc. ( NASDAQ:AMZN / NASDAQ). Following a strong rally that reached macro highs near the 286.58 horizontal ceiling, price action has entered a corrective phase. The stock is currently descending toward a high-confluence demand zone where dynamic institutional support meets key structural polarity floors. The stock is trading at **248.42 (-2.02%)** in pre-market, testing immediate lower levels. --- ### 🔍 Technical Architecture & Level Roadmap: Our quantitative Daily framework isolates the primary dynamic moving average anchors, horizontal polarity floors, and upside target projections: 1. **High-Confluence Demand Focus Zone (Highlighted Circle):** * **200-Period Exponential Moving Average (200-EMA):** **242.87** (purple line) — Core dynamic institutional trend baseline under direct test. * **Horizontal Polarity Support Floor:** **226.01** (red line) — Structural support level providing strong confluence alongside the 200-EMA. 2. **Overhead Dynamic & Static Resistance Ceilings:** * **17-Period Dynamic Resistance (17-EMA):** **256.30** (red line) — Trailing dynamic ceiling that buyers must reclaim to regain short-term control. * **Macro Record High Resistance:** **286.58** (red line) — Primary structural target and major range peak. * **Upper Channel Boundary (Blue LTA):** Descending/ascending channel resistance guide capping multi-month expansion moves. 3. **Macro Base Support:** * **Long-Term Ascending Trendline (Black LTA) / Static Floor:** **198.96** — Major long-term structural anchor. --- ### 🛡️ Strategic Operational Scenarios: * **Scenario A — Bullish Reversal Off Confluence (Blue Arrow Projection):** The primary setup favors a buyer response within the **242.87 (200-EMA) – 226.01** demand zone. A bullish reversal pattern inside this circle opens room for a rally back toward **256.30 (17-EMA)** and ultimate expansion toward the **286.58** high. * **Scenario B — Bearish Expansion Below 226:** A daily closing breakdown below **226.01** invalidates the immediate reversal setup, opening deeper downside exposure toward the macro ascending support trendline near **198.96**. ### 📊 Tactical Parameters Summary: * **Current Bias:** Corrective Pullback / Support Reversal Setup * **Primary Demand Zone (200-EMA / Static Floor):** 242.87 / 226.01 * **Dynamic Resistance Ceiling (17-EMA):** 256.30 * **Macro Peak Target:** 286.58 * **Macro Structural Base:** 198.96 --- 📊 **ChartPro Data** *US Equities Architecture, Dynamic Moving Averages & Systematic Risk Management.* ⚠️ **Disclaimer:** For educational and informational purposes only. This active market study represents a personal trading framework and does not constitute financial or investment advice.

TITradingView Ideas16 Sept

S&P 500 (ES) Analysis, Key-Zones, Setup for Wed (Sep 16)

Bias: December S&P 500 futures settled Tuesday at 7,656.00 after a narrow 57.50 point session between 7,701.00 and 7,643.50, closing in the lower 22 percent of the range. The low is the fact that matters, because 7,643.50 is also the one-month low, so the contract printed a fresh monthly extreme and then failed to recover into the settle. The cash index closed at 7,586, down about 0.45 percent. The driver was the rates and energy complex rather than anything equity-specific: benchmark 10-year Treasury yields topped 5 percent for the first time since 2007 while crude rose about 4 percent to trade above 105 dollars. The broad index absorbed that better than the Nasdaq did, which is the expected ordering when the shock runs through the discount rate, and it shows in the relative structure, since this contract still holds above its 100-day average at 7,626.08 while its technology counterpart has already lost that reference. Positioning is the destabilizing input. The contract settled 47.35 points beneath the modeled gamma-flip level published for it at 7,703.35, and beneath that threshold dealer hedging extends moves rather than absorbing them. The zero-dated positive gamma pocket that stabilized Tuesday afternoon expired at the close, so that cushion is gone. Estimated gamma notional on the exchange-traded fund is negative 1.715 billion dollars with a gamma tilt of 0.607, and the fund closed at 758.05, beneath its own modeled flip level of 765 and beneath its primary put side support base of 760. Against all of that sits a genuinely stretched oscillator set, with the 14-day stochastic percent K at 12.51 and the 20-day at 11.35, readings from which relief rallies typically begin. The multi-indicator composite is only 16 percent sell, far less committed than the Nasdaq's, so this is a market that is stretched rather than trending. Bias is lower while beneath 7,727, with a retest of the 7,700 to 7,705 band the preferred area to sell, since Tuesday's high at 7,701.00 and the modeled flip at 7,703.35 sit within 2.35 points of each other. A 25 basis point increase is already roughly 92 percent priced, so the 02:00 PM ET projections and guidance, not the rate number, will write Wednesday's direction. Resistance: - 7,747.67 (SPX 7,678) Pivot R3, the outer boundary of the computed ladder and the practical ceiling for any session that does not involve a policy surprise - 7,725.35 (SPX 7,655) modeled volatility threshold, a modeled underlying-price level published by the positioning source as of Tuesday's close rather than an option strike, sitting almost exactly on the second pivot - 7,724.33 (SPX 7,654) Pivot R2, reinforced by the 40-day average crossing at 7,724.40 and the 9-day crossing at 7,726.06, which makes 7,724 to 7,726 the firmest overhead shelf - 7,706.66 (SPX 7,637) 3 Standard Deviation Resistance, a statistical extension boundary where a tag without a close above is a fade candidate - 7,703.35 (SPX 7,633) modeled gamma-flip level, the threshold above which dealer hedging stabilizes and below which it amplifies, sitting just 2.35 points above Tuesday's session high and forming the decisive line for Wednesday - 7,690.17 (SPX 7,620) Pivot R1, with 1 Standard Deviation Resistance at 7,685.25 just beneath it, making 7,685 to 7,690 the first real supply band above the settle - 7,681.15 (SPX 7,611) the 5-day average, the nearest overhead average and the first test any recovery attempt faces - 7,666.83 (SPX 7,597) Pivot Point, only 10.83 points above the settle, so the session opens essentially at its pivot Support: - 7,650.78 (SPX 7,581) computed downside objective from the same level set that produces the pivot ladder - 7,645.50 (SPX 7,576) the 50 percent retracement of the 13-week span, two points above Tuesday's low and the upper edge of the pivotal shelf - 7,643.50 (SPX 7,574) Tuesday's session low and the one-month low, the most important level on the board, and its cash equivalent lands on the implied one-day move low that held through Tuesday's session - 7,632.67 (SPX 7,563) Pivot S1, the first computed level beneath the monthly low - 7,626.75 (SPX 7,557) 1 Standard Deviation Support carrying the 100-day average at 7,626.08, the structural line whose sustained loss would mark this as more than a pullback - 7,614.63 (SPX 7,545) 2 Standard Deviation Support, reinforced by the 40-day average stall reference at 7,613.50 - 7,609.33 (SPX 7,539) Pivot S2, with 3 Standard Deviation Support at 7,605.34 immediately beneath it - 7,575.17 (SPX 7,505) Pivot S3, effectively coincident with the primary put side support base published at 7,570.35, making 7,570 to 7,575 the deepest structural objective in view Primary Setup: SHORT ES from the 7,700 to 7,705 zone on a retest of Tuesday's session high, where the modeled gamma-flip level at 7,703.35 sits 2.35 points above that high and gives an unusually precise place to define risk. Stop 7,727, above both Pivot R2 at 7,724.33 and the modeled volatility threshold at 7,725.35, so that a stop-out requires reclaiming the stabilizing side of the positioning structure rather than merely tagging it. Targets at 7,666.83 first, the computed Pivot Point, 7,643.50 second at Tuesday's session low and one-month low, and 7,626.75 third where 1 Standard Deviation Support carries the 100-day average at 7,626.08, taken only if momentum extends through the second target on expanding volume. From a 7,702.50 entry midpoint that is 24.50 points of risk against 35.67, 59.00 and 75.75 points of reward, roughly 1.5 to 1, 2.4 to 1 and 3.1 to 1. Half size is appropriate given that the interest rate decision, the rate statement and the Summary of Economic Projections all land at 02:00 PM ET with the press conference at 02:30 PM ET, and retail sales at 08:30 AM ET is forecast at 0.8 percent against a negative 0.6 percent prior. Pricing is likely to be disorderly between 02:00 PM and 02:45 PM ET, a volatility-index expiration at 09:30 AM ET can distort early pricing, and the cash open at 09:30 AM ET sets the session's first directional test. A sustained move above 7,727, and in particular an hourly close above the 7,741 to 7,748 band where the 20-day average and Pivot R3 sit, negates the thesis. The standing counter-argument is the oscillator set, since a 14-day stochastic percent K of 12.51 at a one-month low is the configuration from which relief rallies start, which is why this is defined at a specific confluence rather than sold into weakness. Wednesday is a decision session rather than a trend session. At-the-money implied volatility on the cash index for Wednesday is 19.0 percent, implying roughly 119 basis points of movement, about 90 points on the cash index at Tuesday's close, which is materially wider than the 14-day average true range of 66.49 points. That is the options market stating plainly that it expects an outsized session, and the expansion is scheduled for 02:00 PM ET.

TITradingView Ideas16 Sept

S&P 500 (ES) Analysis, Key-Zones, Setup for Wed (Sep 16)

Bias: December S&P 500 futures settled Tuesday at 7,656.00 after a narrow 57.50 point session between 7,701.00 and 7,643.50, closing in the lower 22 percent of the range. The low is the fact that matters, because 7,643.50 is also the one-month low, so the contract printed a fresh monthly extreme and then failed to recover into the settle. The cash index closed at 7,586, down about 0.45 percent. The driver was the rates and energy complex rather than anything equity-specific: benchmark 10-year Treasury yields topped 5 percent for the first time since 2007 while crude rose about 4 percent to trade above 105 dollars. The broad index absorbed that better than the Nasdaq did, which is the expected ordering when the shock runs through the discount rate, and it shows in the relative structure, since this contract still holds above its 100-day average at 7,626.08 while its technology counterpart has already lost that reference. Positioning is the destabilizing input. The contract settled 47.35 points beneath the modeled gamma-flip level published for it at 7,703.35, and beneath that threshold dealer hedging extends moves rather than absorbing them. The zero-dated positive gamma pocket that stabilized Tuesday afternoon expired at the close, so that cushion is gone. Estimated gamma notional on the exchange-traded fund is negative 1.715 billion dollars with a gamma tilt of 0.607, and the fund closed at 758.05, beneath its own modeled flip level of 765 and beneath its primary put side support base of 760. Against all of that sits a genuinely stretched oscillator set, with the 14-day stochastic percent K at 12.51 and the 20-day at 11.35, readings from which relief rallies typically begin. The multi-indicator composite is only 16 percent sell, far less committed than the Nasdaq's, so this is a market that is stretched rather than trending. Bias is lower while beneath 7,727, with a retest of the 7,700 to 7,705 band the preferred area to sell, since Tuesday's high at 7,701.00 and the modeled flip at 7,703.35 sit within 2.35 points of each other. A 25 basis point increase is already roughly 92 percent priced, so the 02:00 PM ET projections and guidance, not the rate number, will write Wednesday's direction. Resistance: - 7,747.67 (SPX 7,678) Pivot R3, the outer boundary of the computed ladder and the practical ceiling for any session that does not involve a policy surprise - 7,725.35 (SPX 7,655) modeled volatility threshold, a modeled underlying-price level published by the positioning source as of Tuesday's close rather than an option strike, sitting almost exactly on the second pivot - 7,724.33 (SPX 7,654) Pivot R2, reinforced by the 40-day average crossing at 7,724.40 and the 9-day crossing at 7,726.06, which makes 7,724 to 7,726 the firmest overhead shelf - 7,706.66 (SPX 7,637) 3 Standard Deviation Resistance, a statistical extension boundary where a tag without a close above is a fade candidate - 7,703.35 (SPX 7,633) modeled gamma-flip level, the threshold above which dealer hedging stabilizes and below which it amplifies, sitting just 2.35 points above Tuesday's session high and forming the decisive line for Wednesday - 7,690.17 (SPX 7,620) Pivot R1, with 1 Standard Deviation Resistance at 7,685.25 just beneath it, making 7,685 to 7,690 the first real supply band above the settle - 7,681.15 (SPX 7,611) the 5-day average, the nearest overhead average and the first test any recovery attempt faces - 7,666.83 (SPX 7,597) Pivot Point, only 10.83 points above the settle, so the session opens essentially at its pivot Support: - 7,650.78 (SPX 7,581) computed downside objective from the same level set that produces the pivot ladder - 7,645.50 (SPX 7,576) the 50 percent retracement of the 13-week span, two points above Tuesday's low and the upper edge of the pivotal shelf - 7,643.50 (SPX 7,574) Tuesday's session low and the one-month low, the most important level on the board, and its cash equivalent lands on the implied one-day move low that held through Tuesday's session - 7,632.67 (SPX 7,563) Pivot S1, the first computed level beneath the monthly low - 7,626.75 (SPX 7,557) 1 Standard Deviation Support carrying the 100-day average at 7,626.08, the structural line whose sustained loss would mark this as more than a pullback - 7,614.63 (SPX 7,545) 2 Standard Deviation Support, reinforced by the 40-day average stall reference at 7,613.50 - 7,609.33 (SPX 7,539) Pivot S2, with 3 Standard Deviation Support at 7,605.34 immediately beneath it - 7,575.17 (SPX 7,505) Pivot S3, effectively coincident with the primary put side support base published at 7,570.35, making 7,570 to 7,575 the deepest structural objective in view Primary Setup: SHORT ES from the 7,700 to 7,705 zone on a retest of Tuesday's session high, where the modeled gamma-flip level at 7,703.35 sits 2.35 points above that high and gives an unusually precise place to define risk. Stop 7,727, above both Pivot R2 at 7,724.33 and the modeled volatility threshold at 7,725.35, so that a stop-out requires reclaiming the stabilizing side of the positioning structure rather than merely tagging it. Targets at 7,666.83 first, the computed Pivot Point, 7,643.50 second at Tuesday's session low and one-month low, and 7,626.75 third where 1 Standard Deviation Support carries the 100-day average at 7,626.08, taken only if momentum extends through the second target on expanding volume. From a 7,702.50 entry midpoint that is 24.50 points of risk against 35.67, 59.00 and 75.75 points of reward, roughly 1.5 to 1, 2.4 to 1 and 3.1 to 1. Half size is appropriate given that the interest rate decision, the rate statement and the Summary of Economic Projections all land at 02:00 PM ET with the press conference at 02:30 PM ET, and retail sales at 08:30 AM ET is forecast at 0.8 percent against a negative 0.6 percent prior. Pricing is likely to be disorderly between 02:00 PM and 02:45 PM ET, a volatility-index expiration at 09:30 AM ET can distort early pricing, and the cash open at 09:30 AM ET sets the session's first directional test. A sustained move above 7,727, and in particular an hourly close above the 7,741 to 7,748 band where the 20-day average and Pivot R3 sit, negates the thesis. The standing counter-argument is the oscillator set, since a 14-day stochastic percent K of 12.51 at a one-month low is the configuration from which relief rallies start, which is why this is defined at a specific confluence rather than sold into weakness. Wednesday is a decision session rather than a trend session. At-the-money implied volatility on the cash index for Wednesday is 19.0 percent, implying roughly 119 basis points of movement, about 90 points on the cash index at Tuesday's close, which is materially wider than the 14-day average true range of 66.49 points. That is the options market stating plainly that it expects an outsized session, and the expansion is scheduled for 02:00 PM ET.

TITradingView Ideas16 Sept
TI

FOMC is the catalyst. $MSTR is the chart

https://www.tradingview.com/x/0bwCaUqP/ NASDAQ:MSTR is not just another software stock to me. It trades heavily around its Bitcoin exposure, so I’m watching BTC first before deciding what MSTR is giving me. My macro map: BTC → 4H reclaim zone: $77,248–$78,488 → Key failure level: $75,560 MSTRUSDT → Pullback area: $128.46 → Invalidation: $120.58 → T1: $147.33 My idea is simple: If FOMC comes in less hawkish than feared and BTC reclaims its 4H zone, I’ll look for MSTR to confirm the move. If BTC loses $75,560 and yields stay elevated, the MSTR setup becomes defensive instead. I’m not chasing the FOMC candle. I want the reaction → BTC confirmation → MSTR setup. That’s why I like having Crypto + TradFi Perps in one place like Bitget. I can watch CRYPTO:BTCUSD and NASDAQ:MSTR side by side without switching between platforms. Also keeping an eye on Strategy’s capital structure. The company recently repurchased $139.3M of STRC while leaving its 845,050 BTC holdings unchanged, so there’s no fresh BTC accumulation from that latest update. One catalyst. One ticker. One clean setup. Not Financial Advice. Always DYOR.

TITradingView Ideas16 Sept

Rocketlab - The Stock Came Back to Earth, Ready to Re-Launch

NASDAQ:RKLB Rocket Lab - Rising Wedge Breakdown, 61.8% Retracement, Falling Wedge Building. One Level Decides The Entry. Rocket Lab deserves every bit of attention it is getting. Q1 2026 revenue came in at $200.3 million, up 63% year-over-year, with adjusted EBITDA losses narrowing dramatically and a backlog that keeps expanding. The Neutron rocket remains on track for its first launch in late 2026, which would transform the company from a small-payload specialist into a genuine competitor for medium-lift missions. Morgan Stanley, Bank of America, and TD Cowen have all raised price targets this year, with a consensus analyst target of $111 implying approximately 78% upside from current levels. The Iridium acquisition announced in June adds recurring satellite revenue to what was already a structurally compelling growth story. This is not hype, the fundamentals are catching up to the narrative. The Setup After an enormous rally from 2024 that unfolded within a rising wedge, the pattern played out exactly as the textbook suggests, price broke down and retraced 61.8% of the full wedge height, one of the most significant Fibonacci levels in technical analysis. That correction carved out a falling wedge, which, in contrast to the rising wedge that preceded it, typically resolves to the upside. We believe the current bounce could be the final one within the falling wedge, given the confluence with the 61.8% Fibonacci retracement and the white horizontal support/resistance level that has been respected multiple times historically. If macro pressure forces one more leg lower, the low $50s represents the likely final bounce zone, a confluence of that same white support and the 200-day EMA on the 3-day timeframe. https://www.tradingview.com/x/hnHzDo6S/ Our Entry Signal We will not initiate a position before confirmation. A weekly close above the falling wedge resistance is our trigger, not before. Levels to Watch Entry trigger - weekly close above falling wedge resistance Key support - white horizontal level, respected multiple times Macro support - low $50s confluence with 200-day EMA on 3D timeframe Keep posted for updates.

TITradingView Ideas15 Sept

BEARISH - below 26,000

Nasdaq remains under pressure as the U.S. 10Y Treasury yield trades around 5%, oil remains above $100, and markets prepare for a potentially hawkish Fed. Higher yields and renewed inflation concerns create an unfavorable environment for high-valuation technology stocks. At the same time, the AI trade is facing a new source of pressure. Calls from leading AI executives to slow the pace of AI development have raised concerns over the sustainability of the massive infrastructure and semiconductor investment cycle. With AI-related stocks responsible for a significant part of the market’s recent gains, any moderation in AI capex expectations could put additional pressure on Nasdaq.

TITradingView Ideas15 Sept

USDJPY W38 — the recoveries are getting weaker

US Treasury yields have moved above 5%, yet USDJPY remains well below its July high. Earlier sharp declines were eventually recovered. The rebound after July stopped short of restoring the previous peak, and September brought another substantial decline. That combination makes USDJPY worth watching into this week’s Federal Reserve and Bank of Japan meetings. The question is whether the recent yen strength survives the announcements and begins to affect risk assets more broadly. Japanese equities already show a weaker structure, while Nasdaq provides a useful test outside Japan. For the broader stress thesis to develop, those markets need to do more than react to the same headline. They need to sustain the move after the initial volatility passes. THE CHANGE IN USDJPY https://www.tradingview.com/x/WsmZ8LPx/ The daily chart shows why the recovery matters as much as the initial decline. Several sharp selloffs earlier in the year were followed by substantial rebounds. Buyers eventually recovered the lost ground, and USDJPY went on to trade higher. The more recent sequence has been different. After the July peak, the pair fell sharply and recovered only part of the decline. The August rebound remained below that peak. September then produced another leg lower, leaving the current recovery beneath both earlier highs. This gives us an observable change: buyers have become less effective at repairing the damage after a selloff. A carry position typically combines borrowing in a lower-yielding currency with exposure to a higher-yielding asset. Its interest income accumulates gradually, while an adverse currency move can create losses quickly. A strengthening funding currency therefore becomes more consequential when it persists long enough to outweigh the income that made the position attractive. That mechanism offers one possible explanation for a weaker USDJPY recovery. The chart alone cannot establish how much carry exposure has been reduced or who is selling. It also cannot identify an intervention from the shape of a candle. Official intervention, changing policy expectations and position adjustment can all produce sharp moves. For this analysis, the useful evidence is what follows: whether buyers recover the decline, or whether the rebound fails and another lower low develops. THE RATES TEST https://www.tradingview.com/x/svufKuyg/ The US10Y snapshot shows yields above 5% and an upward trend into the event window. All else equal, higher US yields can support demand for dollar assets. USDJPY’s failure to return to its July high therefore deserves attention alongside that rates backdrop. There is an essential qualification. The US yield is only one side of the comparison. Japanese yields, expected policy paths and the maturity of the exposure all matter. The ten-year yield also contains inflation and term-premium components; it is not a direct measure of the short-term funding return available to a carry trader. A sustained USDJPY decline alongside falling US yields would be consistent with a reduction in the dollar’s rate advantage. A decline while US yields remain elevated would raise a more interesting question, but answering it would still require the Japanese side of the spread. This is why the response to the meetings matters. A policy decision can move short-term rate expectations and longer-dated bond yields differently. The useful test is whether the resulting rates environment helps USDJPY recover—and whether that recovery holds. THE JAPAN TEST https://www.tradingview.com/x/wnJju7JW/ The Nikkei chart has failed to recover its June peak. The August rally crossed the descending trendline, but it did not establish a lasting upward structure. Selling returned, and the index subsequently moved lower through a series of rebounds and renewed declines. That failed improvement is more informative than the trendline crossing itself. Buyers managed to change the appearance of the chart temporarily, but they did not regain control of the broader sequence. A stronger yen can affect Japanese equities through several channels. It can reduce the yen value of overseas earnings for some exporters, alter investment incentives and increase pressure on positions funded in yen. These effects vary across companies and portfolios, so yen appreciation does not translate mechanically into an index decline. The recent September lows provide the first practical test. If USDJPY weakens further while Japanese equities continue defending those lows, the currency move has yet to produce the equity deterioration required by this thesis. If the Nikkei breaks below them, attempts to recover the broken area and then turns lower again, the evidence becomes stronger. A subsequent move through the July low would extend that deterioration to a larger part of the chart. These are separate stages, and each needs its own confirmation. THE GLOBAL TEST https://www.tradingview.com/x/SXY6Vwx2/ Nasdaq tests whether the weakness is broadening beyond Japan. The chart here is the Pepperstone NAS100 cash CFD, so its session boundaries and gaps should be read on that basis. The recent opening gap and rebound attracted attention, but the gap itself does not establish a directional edge. The more useful observation is that the rebound has so far failed to restore the earlier September highs, leaving price back near the lower part of its recent structure. The next recovery matters. If buyers reclaim the breakdown area, establish a higher low and sustain the advance, Nasdaq would be absorbing the pressure. That would weaken the argument that the currency move is becoming a broader risk event. If rebounds continue to fail and the recent lows give way while USDJPY and the Nikkei are also weakening, the evidence for a wider adjustment increases. Even then, simultaneous declines would show participation across markets rather than prove a common funding cause. US equities can fall because of yields, earnings expectations or other developments independently of the yen. Evidence from positioning, credit and funding markets would be needed to make the stronger causal claim. WHAT WOULD CONFIRM IT The sequence begins with USDJPY sustaining its weakness beyond the initial central-bank reaction. A daily close below the September low shown in the snapshot would provide the first additional evidence. A recovery that fails to regain that broken area, followed by another lower low, would make the change more convincing. Japanese equities then need to participate. On the four-hour Nikkei chart, I would look for a close below the recent September lows and a subsequent failed recovery of that area. Nasdaq would provide the next layer if it also closes below its recent lows and fails to regain them on the rebound. These conditions distinguish a brief excursion through support from a market beginning to sustain lower prices. A single wick does not satisfy them, and a closing break remains provisional until the response becomes visible. The complete sequence would strengthen the case for a broader risk adjustment associated with persistent yen strength. It would still leave the scale and source of any forced position reduction open. WHAT WOULD INVALIDATE IT A sharp yen rally that is rapidly reversed would undermine the immediate event thesis. If USDJPY sweeps its September low, recovers it, establishes a higher low and breaks above the intervening rebound high, sellers would have failed to sustain the next leg. A sustained recovery above the August rebound high would challenge the larger sequence of weakening recoveries. That would be a more substantial structural reversal than one strong session after an announcement. The broader stress case also needs to be judged separately from the currency view. If the Nikkei recovers its recent September highs and Nasdaq repairs its breakdown while USDJPY remains soft, yen strength may persist without the equity transmission this post is testing. The W38 assessment belongs at Friday’s close, using the reference swings visible in these snapshots. If the breaks and failed recoveries have not developed by then, the weekly stress thesis remains unconfirmed. The observation window should not be extended simply to preserve the argument. THE LIMITS This is a framework for interpreting price reactions. No historical probability has been established here for this exact combination of USDJPY, yields and equity structures. The charts were captured on September 15. USDJPY is shown on the daily timeframe; the Nikkei and Nasdaq CFDs are shown on four-hour charts. Their session conventions differ, and the reference swings are those visible at the time of writing. US10Y does not establish the full US–Japan rate differential. Price action does not reveal the size of carry positions, and a stronger yen can coexist with resilient equities. The useful change so far is that USDJPY’s recoveries have become less complete. This week tests whether that behaviour persists—and whether the equity markets begin sustaining the same deterioration.

TITradingView Ideas15 Sept