HeraldLoop
TI

TradingView Ideas — page 17

2299 articlestradingview.com ↗

Coverage, page 17

page 17 of 115

#CHRUSDT READY TO NEW EXPLODE !

#CHR The price is moving within a descending channel on the 1-hour timeframe; it has reached the lower boundary and is poised for a rebound. A retest of this boundary is expected, supporting some upward movement. The Relative Strength Index (RSI) indicates a bearish trend, but an upward breakout is likely due to oversold conditions on the 1-hour chart. There is initial support at 0.01360, acting as a preliminary support zone. A key support zone (marked in green) exists at 0.01250; the price has bounced off this area multiple times, making it a strong support level. The price is moving toward the 100-period moving average, which is within close reach; this supports a potential rise. Entry Price: 0.01530 Target 1: 0.01556 Target 2: 0.01625 Target 3: 0.01696 Stop Loss: At the green support zone. Remember this simple rule: Capital management. If you have any questions, please leave a comment. Thank you.

TITradingView Ideas21h ago

Aegis Vopak Terminals – Head & Shoulders Analysis

Pattern Identification - A clear Head & Shoulders structure is visible: Left Shoulder, Head, and Right Shoulder marked. - This is a classic reversal pattern, often signaling potential trend change from bullish to bearish. Price Action - Current weekly close: 309.55 (+4.90%). - High: 316.00, Low: 288.90. - Despite the positive weekly close, the right shoulder formation suggests weakening momentum. Key Levels - Immediate Resistance: 316.00 (weekly high). - Support Zone: 288.90 (weekly low). - Neckline support around 290–295 is critical; breakdown below this zone confirms bearish reversal. Indicators (SmartWay Suite) - SmartWay Dynamic Support: Price hovering near neckline, testing support strength. - SmartWay Teji/Pro Indicator: Likely showing momentum divergence, aligning with reversal risk. - SmartWay Breakout & MTF Leveller: Watching for breakdown confirmation across timeframes. Technical Outlook - If price breaks below 290–295 neckline, downside targets could be 270–260. - Sustaining above 316 negates bearish setup and may extend rally toward 330+. - Weekly close confirmation is essential before acting on the pattern. Trading Implications - Bearish Bias: Head & Shoulders suggests caution; potential short opportunities below neckline. - Strategy: Short entries below 290 with stop‑loss above 316. - Bullish Alternative: If neckline holds and breakout above 316 occurs, trend continuation possible.

TITradingView Ideas21h ago

Did you make any profits with META 2 years ago...........

The thing about charts is it tells you more of WHAT HAD happened to the company share performance over the last 2, 5 or 10 years ......To predict WHAT WILL happen in the future requires much more skills than simple extrapolation. If it was that simple, buy at support and sell at resistance, I would be a MULTI-MILLIONAIRE , haha. So what now ? To buy or sell ? For me, I am not doing anything since I am vested with this company decades ago and simply ride on the trend. It has not come down that attractive that I MUST buy plus there are so many companies that I am looking at (greed, haha) So much expenditure is ON Artificial Intelligence now with some industry players saying it is time to slow down while others like Trump said, "Whoever wins AI, wins the race ! Obviously, he is referring to China as the latter government is ramping up more efforts and money to invest in this sector ! In the mind of Trump, he has to be number 1 or USA for that matter so I don't expect much collaboration with the Chinese side in the forthcoming meeting. China likewise having been played out by him several times are also wary of his shrewd moves and will not be swayed easily by his words anymore. Let's take a back seat and watch how the market plays out......

TITradingView Ideas21h ago

BTCUSD Technical Analysis Liquidity Sweep and Key Levels

BTCUSD is currently consolidating below the 76,800–76,900 resistance zone after a strong upward move. Resistance: 76,700–76,900 Support: 75,550–75,650 FVG: 76,200–76,300 Liquidity: Recent highs around 76,550–76,650 have been swept. Market structure: Price remains above the marked support while forming a short-term consolidation. A sustained break and acceptance above 76,900 could open room for further upside, while rejection from resistance may bring price back toward the 76,200–76,300 FVG and lower support.

TITradingView Ideas21h ago

Does NuScale Hold the Key to Clean Energy?

NuScale Power announced a significant engineering milestone on September 1, 2026. Working with nuclear materials manufacturer MillenniTEK, the company fabricated first-of-a-kind boron-oxide pellets. These components serve NuScale's passive emergency core cooling system. The achievement is a manufacturing milestone, not a deployment milestone. No pellets are installed in an operating reactor. NuScale offers a distinct value proposition for energy markets. Investors must evaluate this innovator across multiple complex dimensions. Geopolitics and Geostrategy Energy independence drives modern national security protocols. NuScale capitalizes on this geopolitical shift. The company supplies technology to the RoPower project in Romania. Nuclearelectrica shareholders approved the final investment decision on February 12, 2026. The plan covers six modules totaling 462 MWe at a former coal site in Doicești. The approval carries explicit conditions. Nuclearelectrica listed mandatory requirements that condition project feasibility. The target is operation at the beginning of the next decade. Analysts project the first module online around 2033. This placement helps Eastern Europe reduce reliance on hostile energy suppliers. Nations globally seek safe and scalable nuclear options. NuScale provides a vital geopolitical tool for allied countries. Macroeconomics and Economics The broader economic landscape presents both hurdles and opportunities. High interest rates stifle capital-intensive energy projects. The Federal Reserve raised its target range to 3.75% to 4.00% on September 16, 2026. NuScale experienced cost pressure directly when its Utah project collapsed in 2023. The Carbon Free Power Project with UAMPS ended amid escalating costs. Macroeconomic demand for clean electricity remains explosive. Data centers and grid electrification require massive power outputs. The Tennessee Valley Authority opportunity belongs to ENTRA1, not NuScale directly. TVA signed an agreement with ENTRA1 Energy on September 2, 2025. ENTRA1 would develop and own six plants across TVA's seven-state region. It would sell output to TVA under future power purchase agreements. NuScale supplies the reactors. The memorandum is non-binding and confidential, with no disclosed timeline or financial terms. NuScale has already incurred a $495 million milestone payment to ENTRA1 under that arrangement. The company ended Q2 2026 with $1.9 billion in cash and investments. Industry Trends and Business Models Traditional nuclear construction suffers from severe cost overruns. NuScale attacks this industry trend directly. The company adopts a business model based on pre-fabrication. Management has assembled a network of more than 60 specialized partners. It has executed over 30 agreements, covering more than half that network. NuScale awarded Paragon a contract for final design development of the Highly Integrated Protection System. Doosan Enerbility has completed two years of production on heavy forgings. Components are manufactured before construction begins. This strategy targets the on-site engineering bottlenecks that sank earlier projects. It aims to transform nuclear plants into scalable and repeatable products. Management, Leadership, and Company Culture Effective leadership requires adaptability and strategic foresight. NuScale management learned painful lessons from the Utah cancellation. Executives now prioritize supply chain resilience and strategic partnerships. ENTRA1 Energy serves as the exclusive global commercialization partner. This partnership model reflects a culture focused on pragmatic execution. Leaders aim to avoid repeating past on-site construction mistakes. Science, Technology, and High-Tech NuScale advances nuclear science through passive engineering. Traditional reactors rely on active mechanical insertion of control rods. They also use powered chemical injection pumps during nonstandard events. NuScale engineered a passive alternative. Boron-oxide pellets sit in baskets inside the containment vessel. On ECCS actuation, vent valves release steam into containment. The steam condenses on the containment wall and runs down. Some condensate routes into the baskets and dissolves the pellets. Recirculation valves then feed the borated water back into the core. Boron absorbs neutrons efficiently. The boron-10 isotope does almost all the work. This reduces the neutrons available to sustain the reaction. The system controls core reactivity without operator intervention. MillenniTEK achieved production yields above 95%. Patent Analysis and Regulatory Moat Intellectual property forms a core part of NuScale's competitive position. The NRC certified the 50 MWe US600 design in 2022. The NRC granted a Standard Design Approval for the uprated 77 MWe US460 module in May 2025. Each module produces 77 MWe and scales to 924 MWe across twelve modules. As of Q2 2026, the company states it holds the only NRC design certification in the SMR industry. That status is a genuine head start. Investors should note the limits. The design approval does not eliminate site-specific licensing requirements. Construction and operating permits remain outstanding for any US project. NuScale protects its designs through patent filings. Cybersecurity Imperatives Digital threats pose critical risks to modern power grids. Attackers target digital control systems across the energy sector. NuScale's passive design reduces the attack surface. The boron-oxide cooling system does not require powered injection pumps. The pellets dissolve and borate the coolant without operator commands. Fewer active components mean fewer remotely exploitable pathways. The plant still runs a protection system. NuScale contracted Paragon to complete final design development of the Highly Integrated Protection System. Passive safety narrows cyber exposure. It does not eliminate it.

TITradingView Ideas21h ago

Gold: Fed vs. Treasury — Something Doesn’t Add Up

Gold: Fed vs. Treasury — Something Doesn’t Add Up Yesterday, the Federal Reserve raised interest rates at a time when the US Treasury Department is raising the alarm about higher yields that are breaking the historical high price level by rising further the US Debt. The decision of the FED to raise interest rates under these conditions remains strange, but this is just my personal opinion. The Federal Reserve and the US Treasury seem to be working against each other. The US Treasury started a $6 billion buy back program by rising the problem of high debt, but on the other hand, the Federal Reserve started to make this situation even worse. Crazy stuff. However, it seems that the Federal Reserve's decision could not lower gold below 4235. The price started to recover again and is already in the same positions as it was yesterday. There may be some ups and downs, but considering that gold could not stay below the previous low, the chances are that it will rise as we had our scenario. Manage risk well because the current situation is not good. I have never seen the US take such actions when the Federal Reserve and the US Treasury are asking for different things. You can find more details on the chart. Thank you! 🍀 ⚠️PS: Do your own analysis and use your own strategy to join the trade. ❤️ If this analysis helps your trading day, please support it with a like or comment ❤️

TITradingView Ideas22h ago

Long on Jay Bharat Maruti above 137

If it breaches 137, the stock can start on a journey till 400 as the first target which I will watch for (educational purposes only) and the long term target can be 7x of 130 ~ 900 level. Time frame will be 0.4x of 9 years = 3.6 years.. So by 2030 December, this stock can touch prices of 900, if not more. Company fundamentally is a simple compounding machine. Clean books. Good cash. Sales growth is less but that is where the additional capex which recently got commissioned comes into picture. Also, maruti has good plans to achhieve by 20230 to double the total number of vehicles produced by 2030. The best part - jay bharat maruti is part of the same group which also has JBM auto. JBM auto has done well and is now a name which is popular in the EV buses space. coming from the same group, a stock which has stayed flat for almost 10 years and now has good things coming in, i feel this should do well. At this price, I am thinking of starting SIP into this. But do your own research. I am a novice and this is just for learning and tracking purpose.

TITradingView Ideas22h ago

Risk 16500

• Strategy Execution: We provide trade calls based on trendline setups. • Lot Size: The calls given are based on standard F&O lot sizes. • Stop-Loss Execution: Strictly follow the stop-loss levels. • 15-Minute Candle Close: Consider the stop-loss triggered only after a 15-minute candle closes beyond the level. • Position Sizing: Limit exposure to a maximum of two open positions at a time. • Important Note: Do not risk more than 2% of your capital per trade.

TITradingView Ideas22h ago

USD/CAD: Fed Hike Pushes Price Toward 1.4000

USD/CAD remains structurally bullish after the Federal Reserve delivered a 25 bp rate hike, taking the policy rate to 3.75%–4.00%. The Fed's projections also leave room for another hike this year. That combination continues to support the USD, while USD/CAD has pushed aggressively higher toward the 1.4000 psychological resistance. 📈 Technical Structure The chart shows a strong sequence of higher highs and higher lows, followed by a sharp breakout from the 1.3940–1.3950 area. Current price is consolidating just below 1.4000. Key levels 🔴 1.4000 — major resistance / psychological level 🟢 1.3950 — key breakout support 🟢 1.3920 — secondary support 🟢 1.3900 — deeper support 🟢 Bullish Scenario A clean break above 1.4000, followed by a successful retest and hold, would provide confirmation for continuation. Potential upside levels: 1.4020 → 1.4050 → 1.4100 The key is acceptance above 1.4000, not simply a wick through the level. 🔴 Bearish Scenario If price repeatedly rejects 1.4000 and then loses 1.3980, watch for a deeper correction toward: 1.3950 → 1.3920 → 1.3900 A sustained break below 1.3950 would significantly weaken the current bullish structure. 🛢️ Fundamental Context Oil has pulled back from its recent highs, which reduces some of the CAD support coming from elevated crude prices. However, the Fed's tightening expectations and elevated U.S. yields remain important USD drivers. The market has therefore moved from: "Will the Fed hike?" to: "Will the Fed hike again?" That expectation is now part of the USD/CAD equation. 🎯 Trading Advantage™ Thesis Bias: Bullish Battlefield: 1.4000 Bullish confirmation: Break + hold + retest above 1.4000 Major invalidation zone: 1.3950 I am watching the reaction at 1.4000, rather than chasing the move into resistance. Trade the reaction, not the prediction. #USDCHF #USDCAD #ForexTrading #ForexAnalysis #TechnicalAnalysis #PriceAction #FederalReserve #Fed #InterestRates #CanadianDollar #USD #MacroTrading #TradingView #TheTradingAdvantage

TITradingView Ideas22h ago

#ADAUSDT 1 H Spot LONG

#ADA The price is moving within a bearish channel on the 1-hour timeframe; it has reached the lower boundary and is poised for a rebound. A retest of this boundary is expected, supporting some upward movement. The Relative Strength Index (RSI) indicates a bearish trend, but an upward breakout is likely due to oversold conditions on the 1-hour chart. There is initial support at 0.1740, serving as a preliminary support zone. A key support zone (marked in green) exists at 0.1611; the price has bounced off this area multiple times, making it a strong support level. The price is moving toward the 100-period moving average, which is within close range; this supports a potential rise. Entry Price: 0.1950 Target 1: 0.2006 Target 2: 0.2076 Target 3: 0.2166 Stop Loss: At the green resistance zone. Remember this simple rule: Capital management. If you have any questions, please leave a comment. Thank you.

TITradingView Ideas22h ago

#DOGSUSDT LONG SET UP ALERT !

#DOGS The price is moving within a descending channel on the 1-hour timeframe; it has reached the lower boundary and is poised for a rebound. A retest of this boundary is expected, supporting an upward move. The Relative Strength Index (RSI) indicates a bearish trend, but an upward breakout is likely due to oversold conditions on the 1-hour timeframe. There is initial support at 0.00003843 acting as a primary support zone. A key support zone (marked in green) exists at 0.00003370; the price has rebounded from this area multiple times, making it a strong support level. The price is trending toward the 100-period moving average, which is within close reach; this supports a potential rise. Entry Price: 0.00004480 Target 1: 0.00004671 Target 2: 0.00004911 Target 3: 0.00005175 Stop Loss: At the green support zone. Remember this simple rule: Capital management. If you have any questions, please leave a comment. Thank you.

TITradingView Ideas22h ago

Larry Williams' Variable Accumulation: A Conceptual Study

● 📊 The Conceptual Origin - The concept at the heart of this discussion belongs to a family of tools developed to answer a single persistent question in market analysis: does the volume transacted during a given period confirm or contradict the price movement that accompanied it. Larry Williams, working in the tradition of accumulation and distribution theory pioneered by earlier chartists, proposed a refinement that moved beyond the simple close-to-close volume attribution used in classical accumulation and distribution lines. His insight was that not all volume within a bar carries equal informational weight, and that the true measure of buying or selling pressure must account for the position of the close relative to the entire range traversed during that period, scaled against the magnitude of that range itself. - This is fundamentally a variable-weighting philosophy. Rather than treating every unit of volume as an equal vote for accumulation or distribution, the underlying logic assigns a proportional weight based on where the close settled within the high-low range, and then further normalizes that proportion against the range's own size relative to its recent history. The economic rationale is that a narrow-range day with a close pinned at the extreme reflects concentrated conviction, whereas a wide-range day with a close near the midpoint reflects contested, indecisive participation, even if both days transacted identical volume. - Historically, this approach emerged from a broader academic and practitioner effort during the late twentieth century to quantify what had previously been a purely visual and intuitive judgment: the sense that "volume confirms price." By formalizing this intuition into a repeatable mathematical construct, the concept became transferable, testable, and combinable with other analytical frameworks, which is precisely why variants of this logic persist across multiple generations of technical analysis literature. ● 📈 Narrative Technical Analysis - Mechanically, the logic operates on three interdependent inputs drawn from each price bar: the closing price, the true high and low of that bar's range, and the volume transacted. The distance between the close and the midpoint of the range is measured, then divided by the total range itself, producing a normalized ratio that oscillates between negative and positive extremes depending on whether the close favored the upper or lower portion of the bar. This ratio is then multiplied by the period's volume, converting a purely positional measurement into a volume-weighted pressure reading. - When this pressure reading is summed cumulatively across a rolling window, the resulting series behaves as a structural regression milestone of sorts, a running ledger of net buying or selling conviction that traders can compare against price action to detect divergence. If price advances to new highs while this cumulative pressure fails to make a corresponding new high, the narrative technical interpretation is that the rally is being carried on thinning conviction, a classic bearish divergence signature. The inverse configuration, where price makes new lows while the pressure ledger refuses to confirm, suggests exhaustion among sellers. - Consolidation box mapping becomes particularly relevant here, because during range-bound conditions the cumulative pressure line tends to oscillate within a horizontal band that mirrors the price consolidation itself. A breakout from that pressure band, occurring in advance of or simultaneously with a breakout in price, is often read as an early confirmation signal, since it implies that the underlying accumulation or distribution activity is beginning to resolve before the price chart makes the move obvious to a purely visual observer. - Volume profile anomalies add another dimension to this narrative. When a disproportionately large volume spike occurs on a bar whose close sits near the range's midpoint rather than its extreme, the resulting pressure contribution is muted despite the raw volume being exceptional. This creates a subtle but important distinction from tools that weight volume uniformly: a volume spike is not automatically read as directional conviction unless the closing behavior corroborates it, which academically aligns the concept closer to an efficient-market interpretation of information absorption than to a naive volume-follows-price assumption. ● 🏛️ Institutional vs. Retail Perspective - Institutional participants, who transact in sizes large enough to move markets across multiple sessions, tend to interpret this class of pressure measurement as a proxy for order-flow absorption. Because institutional execution is typically distributed across time to minimize market impact, a sustained divergence between cumulative pressure and price is often read by desks and quantitative research teams as evidence of a large participant working an order in the opposite direction of the visible trend, quietly absorbing supply or distributing inventory without immediately revealing intent through price alone. - Retail participants, by contrast, generally encounter this concept as a confirmation overlay rather than as a standalone order-flow proxy. Lacking access to genuine order-book depth or block-trade reporting, the retail trader treats the cumulative pressure reading as a secondary filter: a way of asking whether the breakout, pullback, or reversal visible on the price chart is being accompanied by proportionate conviction, or whether it looks thin and therefore suspect. This creates a meaningful asymmetry in how the same mathematical construct is actually deployed across market participants. - A further distinction lies in time horizon. Institutional desks studying accumulation and distribution behavior often do so across weeks or months, correlating the metric with known reporting cycles, index rebalancing dates, or macro event calendars. Retail usage, driven by shorter holding periods and intraday decision cycles, tends to compress the same logic into much shorter lookback windows, which changes the statistical reliability of the readings considerably, since shorter windows are inherently noisier and more susceptible to a handful of anomalous bars skewing the cumulative sum. - There is also a philosophical divergence in how each group treats disagreement between pressure and price. Institutional research desks are more inclined to treat such divergence as a probabilistic signal to be weighted alongside dozens of other factors in a broader model, whereas retail traders are more prone to treat a single divergence reading as a binary trade trigger, a difference in epistemic humility that has significant consequences for risk management downstream. ● ⚙️ Strategic Variance - In a trending market regime, this class of volume-weighted pressure measurement tends to move in reasonably close alignment with price, since sustained directional moves are usually accompanied by consistent closing behavior near the favorable extreme of each bar's range. In such conditions the metric functions primarily as a confirmation tool, reinforcing conviction in the prevailing trend rather than generating novel signals, and traders who rely heavily on divergence detection in this regime often find fewer actionable discrepancies simply because the underlying conviction genuinely is present. - In a ranging or sideways regime, the behavior changes substantially. Because closes oscillate between the upper and lower boundaries of a horizontal channel without net progress, the cumulative pressure series tends to flatten or oscillate within its own horizontal band, mirroring the price structure. This is precisely the environment in which the consolidation box mapping described earlier becomes most valuable, since early resolution of the pressure band ahead of a price breakout can offer a meaningful edge, though this same environment also produces the highest incidence of false signals, since minor volume fluctuations during low-conviction ranging conditions can produce erratic short-term swings in the cumulative reading. - High-volatility regimes introduce a distinct set of challenges. Wide-range bars with volume spikes can produce outsized single-bar contributions to the cumulative pressure sum, occasionally distorting the broader trend of the metric for several subsequent periods until the rolling window normalizes the anomaly. Traders operating in these conditions must therefore exercise particular caution when interpreting sudden shifts in the pressure reading, since a single climactic bar, whether representing genuine capitulation or a transient liquidity event, can masquerade as a structural shift in accumulation or distribution behavior when it may in fact be an isolated occurrence with limited persistence. - Academically, this regime-dependent behavior underscores a broader point about volume-weighted pressure constructs in general: they are not regime-agnostic tools, and their statistical reliability, false-positive rate, and interpretive value shift meaningfully depending on the volatility and directional character of the underlying market, a consideration too often glossed over in simplified treatments of the concept. ● 🧠 Psychological Architecture - The appeal of a volume-weighted pressure construct lies partly in its promise of objectivity, an attempt to replace the subjective visual judgment of "does this move look convincing" with a repeatable numerical output. Yet this very promise introduces its own psychological trap, because traders can develop an unwarranted confidence in a single derived metric simply because it is expressed numerically, mistaking mathematical precision for predictive certainty. The metric measures historical conviction; it does not forecast future conviction, and conflating the two is among the most common cognitive errors traders commit when working with any accumulation-distribution style construct. - Confirmation bias plays an outsized role in how divergence signals from this type of metric are actually used in practice. A trader already inclined toward a bullish thesis will scan the pressure reading selectively for confirming divergence and discount contradicting readings as noise, while a trader inclined bearish will do the reverse. This selective attention undermines the entire analytical value of the tool, because the metric was designed to challenge existing assumptions, not to be filtered through them after the fact. - Loss aversion further complicates the psychological relationship traders have with divergence-based signals. Because a pressure and price divergence often precedes a reversal by an uncertain and sometimes lengthy interval, traders who position early based on the divergence frequently experience a stretch of unrealized drawdown before, if ever, being proven correct. The discomfort of that interim drawdown is felt far more acutely than the eventual satisfaction of a correct call, which tempts many traders to exit prematurely at the point of maximum psychological discomfort rather than at a point dictated by the original analytical thesis. - There is also a subtler cognitive hazard rooted in the illusion of granularity. Because the underlying calculation processes every single bar, traders can develop a false sense of precision, believing that because the metric updates continuously it must also be continuously actionable. In reality, the statistical noise embedded in bar-by-bar volume and range data means that only sustained, multi-bar patterns in the cumulative reading carry meaningful signal, while single-bar fluctuations are largely indistinguishable from randomness, a distinction that requires considerable discipline to internalize and respect under live market conditions. ● 🎲 Risk & Probability Sagas - Any accumulation-distribution style construct, however elegantly derived, remains fundamentally a descriptive statistic about historical order flow rather than a probabilistic forecast of future price behavior, and conflating description with prediction is the single greatest risk-management error associated with this entire category of analysis. The mathematics of the underlying calculation guarantees nothing about forward returns; it merely summarizes what has already occurred in the relationship between price positioning and volume. - From a probabilistic standpoint, divergence signals derived from volume-weighted pressure measurements should be understood as shifting the odds of a particular outcome rather than determining it outright. A divergence that has historically preceded reversals in a given percentage of observed instances still carries a complementary percentage of instances in which no reversal occurred, or in which the reversal was of insufficient magnitude to be tradeable after accounting for transaction costs and slippage. Treating any single divergence occurrence as a near-certain outcome rather than a probabilistically favorable but far from guaranteed condition is a fundamental misapplication of the statistical nature of the underlying data. - The philosophy of position sizing under this kind of probabilistic uncertainty deserves particular emphasis. Because the reliability of any accumulation-distribution divergence varies considerably across market regimes, asset classes, and time horizons, as discussed extensively above, a rigid, uniform approach to position sizing irrespective of regime context is itself a source of unmanaged risk. Sound risk philosophy demands that conviction expressed through position size be proportional not merely to the presence of a signal, but to the historical reliability of that signal type within the specific regime currently prevailing, an asymmetry that many traders fail to account for. - Ultimately, the mathematical philosophy underlying this entire category of volume-weighted pressure analysis rests on a probabilistic worldview: markets are not deterministic systems awaiting decoding by a sufficiently clever formula, but stochastic processes in which certain structural relationships, such as the one between closing position within a range and transacted volume, exhibit statistically meaningful but imperfect tendencies. Respecting that imperfection, rather than seeking false certainty from it, is the mark of a mature analytical approach to this category of technical construct. ● ⚠️ Risk Disclaimer - The concepts discussed in this article are presented for educational and academic purposes only and do not constitute financial, investment, or trading advice of any kind. Technical analysis constructs, including volume-weighted accumulation and distribution frameworks, describe historical relationships between price and volume and carry no guarantee of predictive reliability in future market conditions. Trading and investing in financial markets involves substantial risk, including the potential loss of principal, and past performance or historical statistical tendencies are in no way indicative of future results. Readers should conduct independent research, consider their own risk tolerance and financial circumstances, and consult a qualified financial professional before making any trading or investment decision.

TITradingView Ideas22h ago

Expect sideways move in CG power...#CG POWER AND IND SOL LTD.

CG Power and Industrial Solutions Ltd 1. Price is making Higher highs and Higher lows. 2. Price is in Mark Up Phase (although short term trend had turned sideways). 3. Price gave break out of Double Bottom on weekly chart and Price is correcting after break out… (I) It would be natural for price to correct 5-10 % more from current levels, keeping in mind following technical scenarios: - (a) Complex correction: 1.27 % Exp level coincides with EMA55 and apex of Double Bottom. (b) Price tests the low (811.60) of second week of weekly candle of Oct 2024. (c) On daily chart, Price may respect the immediate demand zone (820—840) with the confluence of SMA 144. 4. Observations of recent price action and short-term trend (Last three months): (I) Price action reveals underneath demand zone at 820-845 and over head supply zone at 933-952, short-term moving averages turned flat and momentum indicator (RSI) oscillating between 40-60 while narrowing on the spread of bands of BB indicate towards an higher probability of indecisive move unless price breaks out the afore mentioned demand or supply zone. 5. However, at current Price levels there are no buying opportunities. 6. As per Current Chart structure, buying opportunities may emerge once price closes above 952 and nullifies the over-head supply zone. Once this event takes place, we shall reanalyse the script to decide Entry, stop loss and other technical figures, till then it is recommended to set an alert at 952.

TITradingView Ideas22h ago

#DASHUSDT – Bullish Breakout Setup | 1H Chart Analys

#DASH The price is moving within a bearish channel on the 1-hour timeframe; it has reached the lower boundary and appears poised for a rebound. A retest of this boundary is expected, supporting an upward move. The Relative Strength Index (RSI) indicates a bearish trend, but an upward breakout is likely due to oversold conditions on the 1-hour chart. There is initial support at 45.00. A key support zone (marked in green) exists at 38.50; the price has rebounded from this area multiple times, making it a strong support level. The price is trending toward the 100-period moving average—a level we are currently approaching—which supports a potential rise. Entry Price: 57.50 Target 1: 60.24 Target 2: 63.57 Target 3: 67.16 Stop Loss: At the green support zone. Remember this simple rule: Capital management. If you have any questions, please leave a comment. Thank you.

TITradingView Ideas22h ago

Cardano: $0.1712 Support Could Decide the Next Move

Recovery Losing Momentum ADA has struggled to build on its recovery from the June low, with the latest rally again failing beneath the major resistance area around $0.24. Lower Highs Developing Since reaching $0.2584 in August, Cardano has produced a series of lower highs. The latest rejection around $0.2321 adds to the signs that buyers are losing momentum. Moving Averages Still Bearish The 100/50-day EMAs have contracted considerably but remain bearishly crossed. Price has also slipped back beneath both averages, keeping the broader technical picture under pressure. Key Support Approaching The $0.1712 swing low is now the major level to watch. A decisive break below there would give the daily chart a bearish change of character and weaken the medium-term recovery considerably. Momentum Favours the Bears RSI remains below 50, while StochRSI has moved into oversold territory. This leaves room for a short-term bounce, but there is little momentum evidence yet that buyers are taking back control. In Summary Cardano's recovery is coming under increasing pressure after another failure beneath the major $0.24 resistance area. Price is back below the bearishly crossed 100/50-day EMAs, while RSI remains below 50. StochRSI being oversold could produce a short-term reaction, but $0.1712 is now the level that matters. Hold it, and the medium-term recovery survives; lose it, and ADA would confirm a bearish change of character.

TITradingView Ideas22h ago